Factors associated with long-term clinical outcome in microscopic colitis

Background and aims Microscopic colitis has been increasingly recognized as a cause of chronic diarrhoea. We aimed to characterize the role of disease-related factors and treatments on the clinical outcomes of microscopic colitis.Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with microscopic colitis who were treated at the University of Chicago and Oregon Health & Science University between August 2010 and May 2016. Patient characteristics and treatments were evaluated as predictors of clinical outcomes using univariate and multivariate analyses. Clinical remission was defined as no symptoms associated with microscopic colitis based on physician assessment and histologic remission was defined as no evidence of histological inflammation of microscopic colitis.Results Seventy-two patients with microscopic colitis were included in the study (28 with lymphocytic colitis and 44 with collagenous colitis). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, proton pump inhibitors and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were used in 23 (31.9%), 14 (19.4%) and 15 (20.8%), respectively, at the time of diagnosis. Among 46 patients with adequate follow-up data, 25 (54.3%) patients achieved clinical remission. Response to budesonide (p = .0002) and achieving histologic remission (p = .0008) were associated with clinical remission on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, budesonide response (p = .0052) was associated with clinical remission (odds ratio 25.00, 95% confidence interval 2.63–238.10). Among 22 patients who underwent a follow-up colonoscopy, five patients (22.7%) achieved histologic remission. All patients with histologic remission maintained clinical remission without medication, whereas only two patients (11.8%) were able to discontinue medical therapy when histologic inflammation was present (p = .0002).Conclusions In the present cohort of patients with microscopic colitis, a favourable response to budesonide was significantly associated with long-term clinical remission, and all patients achieving histological remission were able to maintain clinical remission without further medical therapy. Larger studies are required to confirm these findings

Significance of Linked Color Imaging for Predicting the Risk of Clinical Relapse in Ulcerative Colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease with unknown etiology. Recently, mucosal healing has emerged as an important therapeutic endpoint in UC. Linked color imaging (LCI) is a novel endoscopic system that enhances the color differences of the gastrointestinal mucosa. Our previous study emphasized the redness and yellowness of the lesion using LCI observation, which was useful for the evaluation of histological mucosal activity in UC. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the correlation between LCI observation and clinical relapse rate in UC patients. We retrospectively analyzed UC patients who underwent total colonoscopy between August 2016 and October 2018 at our facility with Mayo endoscopic scores of 0 or 1. We assessed the correlation between orange-like color lesion (defined as LCI-scarlet color lesions) and clinical relapse rate (requiring additional treatment for UC) during the 1-year follow-up period. Fifty-eight patients (22 female, 36 male; median age at diagnosis, 47.2 (18–80) years) who underwent colonoscopy were analyzed. During the 1-year follow-up period, clinical relapse was observed in 12 patients (20.1%) among which ten patients (83.3%) had an LCI-scarlet color lesions recognized by LCI. By contrast, 29 patients (63%) had no LCI-scarlet color lesions in the clinical remission group (n=46). There was a significant difference in LCI-scarlet color between the clinical relapse and remission groups, remaining significantly associated with clinical relapse. LCI findings, including an orange-like color lesion, have diagnostic implications for predicting the risk of clinical relapse in UC during the 1-year follow-up period

The Use of Vedolizumab in Preventing Postoperative Recurrence of Crohn\u27s Disease

Background: Clinical and endoscopic recurrence are common after surgery in Crohn\u27s disease (CD). Vedolizumab has been increasingly used to treat CD, however, its effectiveness in preventing postoperative recurrence remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the use of vedolizumab in the postoperative setting and compare the risk of recurrence between patients receiving vedolizumab and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha agents. Methods: Medical records of CD patients who underwent surgery between April 2014 and June 2016 were reviewed. We first analyzed how frequently vedolizumab is used to prevent postoperative recurrence and compared the patient characteristics with those being treated with other therapies. Furthermore, the rates of endoscopic remission, defined as a simple endoscopic score for CD of 0, at 6-12 months after surgery were compared between patients receiving vedolizumab and anti-TNF-alpha agents. Clinical, biological, and histologic outcomes such as Harvey-Bradshaw index, C-reactive protein, and histologic inflammation also were compared between the 2 groups. Risks of recurrence were assessed by univariate, multivariate, and propensity score-matched analyses. Results: Among 203 patients that underwent a CD related surgery, 22 patients received vedolizumab as postoperative treatment. There were 58, 38, and 16 patients who received anti-TNF-alpha agents, immunomodulators, and metronidazole, respectively, whereas 69 patients were monitored without any medication. Patients receiving vedolizumab were young and frequently had perianal disease. Patients postoperatively treated with vedolizumab or anti-TNF-alpha agents were mostly treated with the same agent pre- and postoperatively. Rate of endoscopic remission at 6-12 months in the vedolizumab group was 25%, which was significantly lower as compared to anti-TNF-alpha agent group (66%, P = 0.01). Vedolizumab use was the only factor that was associated with an increased risk of endoscopic recurrence on both univariate (odds ratio (OR) 5.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.51-24.3, P = 0.005) and multivariate analysis (OR 5.77, 95%CI 1.71-19.4, P = 0.005). The results were supported by a propensity score-matched analysis demonstrating lower rates of endoscopic remission (25 vs 69%, P = 0.03) in patients treated with vedolizumab as compared to anti-TNF-alpha agents. Conclusion: In the present retrospective cohort study of real-world experience, vedolizumab was shown to be commonly used as postoperative treatment for CD especially in high risk patients. Multivariate and propensity score-matched analyses showed that postoperative endoscopic recurrence in CD was higher with vedolizumab than with anti-TNF-alpha agents, but further investigation including controlled trials is required before determining the utility of vedolizumab in preventing postoperative recurrence of CD