The PIAS-like Coactivator Zmiz1 Is a Direct and Selective Cofactor of Notch1 in T Cell Development and Leukemia

SummaryPan-NOTCH inhibitors are poorly tolerated in clinical trials because NOTCH signals are crucial for intestinal homeostasis. These inhibitors might also promote cancer because NOTCH can act as a tumor suppressor. We previously reported that the PIAS-like coactivator ZMIZ1 is frequently co-expressed with activated NOTCH1 in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). Here, we show that similar to Notch1, Zmiz1 was important for T cell development and controlled the expression of certain Notch target genes, such as Myc. However, unlike Notch, Zmiz1 had no major role in intestinal homeostasis or myeloid suppression. Deletion of Zmiz1 impaired the initiation and maintenance of Notch-induced T-ALL. Zmiz1 directly interacted with Notch1 via a tetratricopeptide repeat domain at a special class of Notch-regulatory sites. In contrast to the Notch cofactor Maml, which is nonselective, Zmiz1 was selective. Thus, targeting the NOTCH1-ZMIZ1 interaction might combat leukemic growth while avoiding the intolerable toxicities of NOTCH inhibitors

Aberrant expression of napsin A in a subset of malignant lymphomas

Background: Napsin A is commonly expressed in pulmonary adenocarcinomas and some renal cell carcinomas. However, napsin A expression in lymphoid neoplasms has never been reported. Methods: Glycoproteomic analyses of lymphoma-derived cell lines revealed napsin A expression in anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) cells. We thus investigated napsin A expression in lymphoid neoplasms. A variety of lymphomas (n=672) and histiocytic tumors (n=55) was immunostained for napsin A using patient tissues. Results: In reactive lymphoid tissues, only a few histiocytes were positive for napsin A. ALK-positive ALCLs most frequently expressed napsin A (34.4%, 11/32 cases) at a rate that was significantly higher compared with ALK-negative ALCL (8.6%, 3/35; P=0.015). Napsin A expression was also observed in 13.4% (20/149) of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL), 11.1% (15/134) of Hodgkin lymphomas, 4.9% (2/41) of follicular lymphomas, 6% (4/67) of peripheral T-cell lymphomas, and 3.8% (1/26) of plasma cell neoplasms. Otherwise, napsin A was not detected in any other types of lymphomas or histiocytic neoplasms. Napsin A expression in systemic ALCL was associated with a higher international prognostic index. ALCL and DLBCL patients with napsin A expression tended to have poor prognosis. Conclusion: These results demonstrated that napsin A is aberrantly expressed in a subset of lymphomas. The biological significance of napsin A in lymphomas warrants further study