6 research outputs found

    Π Π°Π½Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΅ исслСдованиС эффСктивности элСктрофизиологичСского ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π³Π° дСксмСдСтомидина Ρƒ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ€Π΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³Π° Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π°

    Get PDF
    Background.At the same time, the main effect of the use of this drug is the elimination of the autonomic nervous system dysfunction and sympatholysis. It seems important to search for a method of indications and selection of a dose of dexmedetomidine in intensive care.Aims to improve the clinical effectiveness of the electrophysiological navigation of the prolonged use of dexmedetomidine in patients with brain pathology of various origins.Methods.The study included 83 patients 2050 days after the traumatic brain injury, anoxic damage; consequences of acute disorders of cerebral. 37 patients comprised the 1st intervention group with a clinical course of dexmedetomidine (male 28; female 9; average age 49.62.3 years) and 46 patients comprised the 2nd control group without pharmacological correction with dexmedetomidine (male 23; female 23, average age 512.5 years). Criteria for the inclusion of prolonged infusion of the drug dexmedetomidine (Orion Pharma, Finland) are based on heart rate variability (HRV) indicators characteristic of sympathetic hyperactivity, the target task of titration of doses of dexmedetomidine served as the parameters for achieving normal HRV indicators, the appearance of parasympathetic hyperactivity served as the basis for reducing the dosage of the drug or stopping it of application. HRV parameters were recorded before dexmetomedine infusion-initially, on 13; 45; 910; 1520 days of drug administration.Results.The starting dose of dexmedetomidine with sympathetic hyperactivity in patients was 0.12 to 0.24 g.kg1.hr1(average dose 0.160.01; total 200 mg/day). According to digital data from HRV, the effective dose of dexmedetomidine ED50 was 0.260.03 g.kg1.hr1(total daily 353.835.1 g) and was achieved on day 910 using dexmedetomidine.Conclusions.The protective role of dexmedetomidine with correction of sympathetic hyperactivity based on electrophysiological navigation according to the HRV is reliable in the following indicators: The improvement of consciousness; a significant decrease in the incidence of distress lung syndrome; septic shock; mortality.ОбоснованиС. ДСксмСдСтомидин ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΡƒΠ΅Ρ‚ΡΡΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π΄ΡƒΡ€Π½ΠΎΠΉ сСдациииликвидации симптомов симпатичСской гипСрактивности (аТиотация, тахикардия, гипСртСнзияит.ΠΏ.). Основной эффСкт примСнСния Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π° устранСниС дисфункции Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅Ρ€Π²Π½ΠΎΠΉ систСмыисимпатолизис. ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π΄ΡΡ‚Π°Π²Π»ΡΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ поиск ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΎΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π±ΠΎΡ€ Π΄ΠΎΠ·Ρ‹ дСксмСдСтомидинавинтСнсивной Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ.ЦСль исслСдования ΡƒΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΡˆΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ возмоТности ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π³Π°ΠΈΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΡƒΡŽ ΡΡ„Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ примСнСнияидозирования Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠΌΠ΅Π΄Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ‰ΡŒΡŽ элСктрофизиологичСской навигацииупациСнтовспатологиСй Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³Π° Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π°.ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹.ВисслСдованиС Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΎ 83 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π° (51 ΠΌΡƒΠΆΡ‡ΠΈΠ½Π°, 32 ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹; срСдний возраст 50,381,7 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°)Π²ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ 20днСйспослСдствиями: Ρ‡Π΅Ρ€Π΅ΠΏΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π²ΠΌΡ‹ (ЧМВ) (n=24; 28,9%); острого Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ кровообращСния (ОНМК) (n=17; 20,5%); аноксичСского поврСТдСния Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³Π° (n=16; 19,3%); ΡΡƒΠ±Π°Ρ€Π°Ρ…Π½ΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ кровоизлияния (n=23; 27,7%); нСйрохирургичСских ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉΠ½Π°Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³Π΅ (n=3; 3,6%). 37 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² (28 ΠΌΡƒΠΆΡ‡ΠΈΠ½, 9 ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½; срСдний возраст 49,62,3 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°) составили ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΡƒΡŽ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡƒ Π²ΠΌΠ΅ΡˆΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π²Π°cкурсом клиничСского примСнСния дСксмСдСтомидинаи46 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² (23 ΠΌΡƒΠΆΡ‡ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹, 23 ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹; срСдний возраст 512,5 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°) Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΡƒΡŽ (ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΡƒΡŽ) группубСзфармакологичСской ΠΊΠΎΡ€Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ дСксмСдСтомидином. ΠšΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π»Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ½Π³ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½Ρ„ΡƒΠ·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π° дСксмСдСтомидина (Ρ„ΠΈΡ€ΠΌΠ°OrionPharma, Ѐинляндия) основанынапоказатСлях Π²Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π±Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈ Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΌΠ° сСрдца (Π’Π Π‘), характСрныхдлясимпатичСской гипСррСактивности; Ρ‚Π°Ρ€Π³Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°Π΄Π°Ρ‡Π΅ΠΉ титрования Π΄ΠΎΠ·Ρ‹ дСксмСдСтомидина слуТили ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€Ρ‹ достиТСния Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΡ‹ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ Π’Π Π‘; появлСниС парасимпатичСской гипСрактивности слуТило основаниСм ΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡŒΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ прСпаратаилипрСкращСния Π΅Π³ΠΎ примСнСния (использовались 5-ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΡƒΡ‚Π½Ρ‹Π΅ записи ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π²Π°Π»ΠΎΠ² (ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΡ€ ΠŸΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚Ρ€-8 Π•Π₯ Ρ„ΠΈΡ€ΠΌΡ‹ НСйрософт, Россия)). РСгистрировали ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΠΈ Π’Π Π‘: SI стрСсс-индСкс БаСвского (индСкс напряТСния рСгуляторных систСм индСкс напряТСния)Π²Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ†Π°Ρ… (Π½.Π΅.); SDNN срСднСквадратичноС ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ RR-кардиоинтСрваловвмс; rMSSD срСднСквадратичноС ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ разности Π΄Π²ΡƒΡ… смСТных отсчСтов RR-кардиоинтСрваловвмс; pNN50% доля RR-ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π²Π°Π»ΠΎΠ²Π²ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ…, ΠΎΡ‚Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π°ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ…ΡΡΠΎΡ‚ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Ρ‹Π΄ΡƒΡ‰Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Ρ‡Π΅ΠΌΠ½Π°50 мс;TP общая ΠΌΠΎΡ‰Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ спСктра частотвмсСк2. ΠŸΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€Ρ‹ Π’Π Π‘ рСгистрировалидоинфузии дСксмСтомидина исходно,Π½Π°13-ΠΈ, 45-Π΅, 910-Π΅, 1520-Π΅ сут примСнСния лСкарствСнного ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π°.Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹.Бтартовая Π΄ΠΎΠ·Π° дСксмСдСтомидинапри симпатичСской гипСрактивности составилаупациСнтовот0,12Π΄ΠΎ0,24 ΠΌΠΊΠ³/ΠΊΠ³/Ρ‡ (срСдняя Π΄ΠΎΠ·Π° 0,160,01; суммарно 200 ΠΌΠΊΠ³/сут).ΠŸΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ„Ρ€ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ΠΌ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ Π’Π Π‘ эффСктивная Π΄ΠΎΠ·Π° дСксмСдСтомидина Π­Π”50составила 0,260,03 ΠΌΠΊΠ³/ΠΊΠ³/Ρ‡ (суммарнозасутки 353,835,1 ΠΌΠΊΠ³)ΠΈΠ±Ρ‹Π»Π° достигнутана910- ΠΉ дСнь примСнСния дСксмСдСтомидина.Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅.ΠšΠΎΡ€Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΡ симпатичСской гипСрактивностиприпримСнСнии дСксмСдСтомидина Π²Ρ‹Π·Ρ‹Π²Π°Π΅Ρ‚ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ уровня сознания, сниТаСт частоту возникновСния сСптичСского шока, дистрСсс синдрома Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΈΡ…, Π»Π΅Ρ‚Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ

    A randomized controlled study of the effectiveness of electrophysiological monitoring of dexmedetomidine in patients with brain damage of various origins [Π Π°Π½Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΅ исслСдованиС эффСктивности элСктрофизиологичСского ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π³Π° дСксмСдСтомидина Ρƒ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ€Π΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³Π° Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π°]

    No full text
    Background. At the same time, the main effect of the use of this drug is the elimination of the autonomic nervous system dysfunction and sympatholysis. It seems important to search for a method of indications and selection of a dose of dexmedetomidine in intensive care. Aims - to improve the clinical effectiveness of the electrophysiological navigation of the prolonged use of dexmedetomidine in patients with brain pathology of various origins. Methods. The study included 83 patients 20-50 days after the traumatic brain injury, anoxic damage; consequences of acute disorders of cerebral. 37 patients comprised the 1st intervention group with a clinical course of dexmedetomidine (male - 28; female - 9; average age 49.6 Β± 2.3 years) and 46 patients comprised the 2nd control group without pharmacological correction with dexmedetomidine (male - 23; female - 23, average age 51 Β± 2.5 years). Criteria for the inclusion of prolonged infusion of the drug dexmedetomidine (Orion Pharma, Finland) are based on heart rate variability (HRV) indicators characteristic of sympathetic hyperactivity, the target task of titration of doses of dexmedetomidine served as the parameters for achieving normal HRV indicators, the appearance of parasympathetic hyperactivity served as the basis for reducing the dosage of the drug or stopping it of application. HRV parameters were recorded before dexmetomedine infusion-initially, on 1-3; 4-5; 9-10; 15-20 days of drug administration. Results. The starting dose of dexmedetomidine with sympathetic hyperactivity in patients was 0.12 to 0.24 ΞΌg.kg-1.hr-1 (average dose 0.16 Β± 0.01; total 200 mg/day). According to digital data from HRV, the effective dose of dexmedetomidine ED50 was 0.26 Β± 0.03 ΞΌg.kg-1.hr-1 (total daily 353.8 Β± 35.1 ΞΌg) and was achieved on day 9-10 using dexmedetomidine. Conclusions. The protective role of dexmedetomidine with correction of sympathetic hyperactivity based on electrophysiological navigation according to the HRV is reliable in the following indicators: The improvement of consciousness; a significant decrease in the incidence of distress lung syndrome; septic shock; mortality. Β© 2020 Izdatel'stvo Meditsina. All rights reserved

    Monitoring of the effectiveness of intensive care and rehabilitation by evaluating the functional activity of the autonomic nervous system in patients with brain damage

    No full text
    Purpose: evaluation of the clinical significance of parametric monitoring of the effectiveness of intensive care and rehabilitation based on the analysis of the functional state of the autonomous nervous system in patients with brain damage of different genesis. Materials and methods. The study included 66 patients on day 20β€”50 after the traumatic brain injury; anoxic damage; and stroke consequences. The isolation of clinical groups and subsequent analysis of clinical status is based on the analysis of the functional state of the autonomic nervous system based on the dynamics of the heart rate variability (HRV) parameters. Findings obtained in studies of 500 patients in the postoperative period with a 5-minute HRV were tested as normal and abnormal ANS parameters [1]. Parasympathetic hyperactivity was measured within the limits for SDNN (standard deviation of all normal-to-normal R-R intervals) > 41.5 ms; for rMSSD (root-mean-square of the successive normal sinus R-R interval difference) > 42.4 ms; for pNN50% (the percentage of interval differences in successive NN intervals greater than 50 ms (NN50) / total number of NN intervals) > 8.1%; for SI (Baevsky stress index, in normalized units) < 80 n. u.; for TP (total power of variance of all NN intervals) > 2000 ms2. Sympathetic hyperactivity was determined within the limits for following parameters: SDNN, < 4.54 ms; rMSSD, < 2.25 ms; pNN50%, < 0.109%; SI, > 900 n. u.; TP < 200 ms2. Normal HRV parameters were selected within the limits of the values for: SDNN [13.31-41.4ms]; rMSSD [5.78β€”42.3 ms]; pNN50% [0.110β€”8.1%]; SI [80β€”900 nu]; for TP [200β€”2000 ms2]. To verify the parasympathetic or sympathetic hyperactivity within these limits, 3 of 5 parameters were chosen [1]. Results. Based on the dynamics of the HRV parameters before the intensive care and on days 30β€”60 of the intensive therapy and rehabilitation of patients with traumatic and non-traumatic brain injuries, 5 main clinical groups of patients were identified. Group 1 (n=27) consisted of patients with normal parameters of the ANS functional activity (both at the time of admission to the hospital and on the 30β€”60th day of the intensive therapy and rehabilita-tion). Group 2 (n=9) included patients with the baseline sympathetic hyperactivity of the ANS at admission to the intensive care unit and normal functional activity of the ANS on the 30β€”60th day of the intensive care and rehabilitation. Group 3 (n=8) included patients with baseline normal functional state of the ANS and the signs of sympathetic hyperactivity of the ANS on the 30β€”60th day of the intensive care and rehabilitation. Group 4 (n=15) consisted of patients with signs of sympathetic hyperactivity of the ANS both initially and on the 30β€”60th day of the intensive care and rehabilitation. Group 5 (n=7) included patients with signs of parasympathetic hyperactivity of the ANS (according to the parameters of HRV) both at baseline, at admission to the intensive care unit, and on the 30β€”60th day of the intensive care and rehabilitation. Conclusion: The normalization of HRV parameters is accompanied by patients’ recovery from the vegetative state and coma to minimal consciousness or normal consciousness; the index of disability rate decreases, the social reintegration grows, according to the DRS scale (M. Rappaport, 1982); dependence on mechanical ventilation reduces, and the muscle tone normalizes. Β© 2018, V.A. Negovsky Research Institute of General Reanimatology. All rights reserved

    Functional activity of the autonomous nervous system at different levels of consciousness in patients with a brain damage

    No full text
    The purpose of the study - assessment of the level of consciousness in patients with a brain damage on the basis of electrophysiological examination of the functional state of the autonomous nervous system by recording parameters of the heart rate variability (HRV). Materials and Methods. The study included 77 patients on Day 20-50 after a traumatic brain injury, anoxic injury, consequences of acute cerebral circulation disorders. The following parameters of the HRV for a 5-minute recording were accepted as criteria of norm and pathology of the autonomous nervous system (ANS) activity: (1) parasympathetic hyperactivity (hypervagal state) values with 95% confidence intervals were recorded within the accepted values for (a) SDNN (standard deviation of normal to normal R-R intervals), [41.5 -149.3 ms]; (b) rMSSD (root-mean-square of the successive normal sinus R-R interval difference in ms), [42.4-175.0 ms];(c) pNN50% (percentage of successive normal sinus RR intervals >50 ms), [8.14-54.66%]; (d) SI (Baevsky stress index), [0-80 normalized units, n. u.]; (2) the sympathetic hyperactivity recordered within the range of values for (a) SDNN [4.54-13.30 ms]; (b) rMSSD [2.25- 5.77 ms]; (c) pNN50% [0-0.109%]; (d) SI >900 n. u.; (3) the normal value of ANS parameters were recordered within the range of values for (a) SDNN [13.31-41.4 ms]; (b) rMSSD [5.78-42.3 ms]; (c) pNN50% [0.110-8.1%]; (d) SI [80-900 n. u.]. For verification of the hypervagal state, sympathetic hyperactivity or normal state, at least 3 of 4 parameters should be within the specified limits. Results. In 40 (51.9%) of 77 patients examined after a brain damage, ANS functional activity parameters were within the range of pathological values. The sympathetic hyperactivity was identified in 34 patients, and in 6 cases the hypervagal state was diagnosed. Pathological parameters of HRV were found in 80% of patients with severe forms of unconsciousness (vegetative state, coma), and only in 20% of patients with normal consciousness. Conclusion. The computer analysis of the HRV is a necessary element of examination of patients with different levels of consciousness after a brain damage of a traumatic and non-traumatic genesis. The frequency of pathological changes in the functional state of the autonomous nervous system increases significantly in groups of patients from the normal level of consciousness to the state of minimal consciousness, vegetative state, and coma. The sympathetic hyperactivity is the main type of ANS pathology in the groups of patients with minimal consciousness, in the vegetative state, and coma. Β© 2018, V.A. Negovsky Research Institute of General Reanimatology. All rights reserved

    Functional activity of the autonomous nervous system at different levels of consciousness in patients with a brain damage

    No full text
    The purpose of the study - assessment of the level of consciousness in patients with a brain damage on the basis of electrophysiological examination of the functional state of the autonomous nervous system by recording parameters of the heart rate variability (HRV). Materials and Methods. The study included 77 patients on Day 20-50 after a traumatic brain injury, anoxic injury, consequences of acute cerebral circulation disorders. The following parameters of the HRV for a 5-minute recording were accepted as criteria of norm and pathology of the autonomous nervous system (ANS) activity: (1) parasympathetic hyperactivity (hypervagal state) values with 95% confidence intervals were recorded within the accepted values for (a) SDNN (standard deviation of normal to normal R-R intervals), [41.5 -149.3 ms]; (b) rMSSD (root-mean-square of the successive normal sinus R-R interval difference in ms), [42.4-175.0 ms];(c) pNN50% (percentage of successive normal sinus RR intervals >50 ms), [8.14-54.66%]; (d) SI (Baevsky stress index), [0-80 normalized units, n. u.]; (2) the sympathetic hyperactivity recordered within the range of values for (a) SDNN [4.54-13.30 ms]; (b) rMSSD [2.25- 5.77 ms]; (c) pNN50% [0-0.109%]; (d) SI >900 n. u.; (3) the normal value of ANS parameters were recordered within the range of values for (a) SDNN [13.31-41.4 ms]; (b) rMSSD [5.78-42.3 ms]; (c) pNN50% [0.110-8.1%]; (d) SI [80-900 n. u.]. For verification of the hypervagal state, sympathetic hyperactivity or normal state, at least 3 of 4 parameters should be within the specified limits. Results. In 40 (51.9%) of 77 patients examined after a brain damage, ANS functional activity parameters were within the range of pathological values. The sympathetic hyperactivity was identified in 34 patients, and in 6 cases the hypervagal state was diagnosed. Pathological parameters of HRV were found in 80% of patients with severe forms of unconsciousness (vegetative state, coma), and only in 20% of patients with normal consciousness. Conclusion. The computer analysis of the HRV is a necessary element of examination of patients with different levels of consciousness after a brain damage of a traumatic and non-traumatic genesis. The frequency of pathological changes in the functional state of the autonomous nervous system increases significantly in groups of patients from the normal level of consciousness to the state of minimal consciousness, vegetative state, and coma. The sympathetic hyperactivity is the main type of ANS pathology in the groups of patients with minimal consciousness, in the vegetative state, and coma. Β© 2018, V.A. Negovsky Research Institute of General Reanimatology. All rights reserved
    corecore