A Reassessment of the Impact of European Contact on the Structure of Native American Genetic Diversity - Fig 1

<p><b>A. Mean log probability of data +/- 1 SD for <i>K</i> = 5–15. B.</b> Δ<b><i>K</i>. C. Bar chart of individual ancestry for a typical run at <i>K</i> = 9. D. Bar chart of individual ancestry for a typical run at <i>K</i> = 15.</b></p

Boxplots of PCAs 1–6 for analyses of the Native American populations only, color-coded by geographic region.

<p>Boxplots of PCAs 1–6 for analyses of the Native American populations only, color-coded by geographic region.</p

Boxplots of PCAs 1–6 for analyses of the Native American populations alone, color-coded by language family.

<p>Boxplots of PCAs 1–6 for analyses of the Native American populations alone, color-coded by language family.</p

Boxplots of PCAs 1–6 color-coded by geographic region.

<p>Boxplots of PCAs 1–6 color-coded by geographic region.</p

MDS plots of Nei’s minimum genetic distances.

<p>A. All 63 populations, color-coded by geographic region. B. 29 Native American populations only, color-coded by language family and sized by the level of non-Native American ancestry. The Tupi-Guaraní-speaking Ache and Suruí populations fall well outside of the plot margins. Their PCo scores are shown in the upper right and left portions of the plot. </p

Region-level Jackknife Results.

<p>Region-level Jackknife Results.</p

Ancestry estimates within each population at values of <i>K</i> from 5–15.

<p>The lines are color coded according to the values of <i>K</i>, with low values in yellow and high values in purple. The red ‘+’ signs show the estimates at K = 9. </p