Decontamination of aerosolised bacteria from a pig farm environment using a pH neutral electrochemically activated solution (Ecas4 anolyte)

An electrochemically activated solution (ECAS), generated by electrolysis of a dilute sodium chloride solution in a four-chamber electrolytic cell (Ecas4), was tested as a sanitising aerosol in eliminating bacteria from the environment of a weaning room vacated 24-48h earlier, at a continuous flow pig farm. An ultrasonic humidifier was used to fill the environment with a fog (droplets with diameters of 1–5 μm) containing 0.25 ppm of hypochlorous acid. The weaning room was fogged for 3 min at 30 min intervals during five hours of aerosol disinfection. An innovative sample treatment with propidium monoazide dye in conjunction with cyclonic air sampling was optimised and adapted for discerning live/dead bacteria in subsequent molecular quantification steps. Without fogging, total bacterial load ranged from 5.06 ± 0.04 to 5.75 ± 0.04 Log10 CFU/m3. After the first hour of fogging, a 78% total bacterial reduction was observed, which further increased to > 97% after the second hour, > 99.4% after the third and 99.8% after the fourth hour, finally resulting in a 99.99% reduction from the farm environment over five hours. Unlike the current formaldehyde spray disinfection protocol, which requires a long empty period because of its hazardous properties, this economically viable and environmentally friendly disinfection protocol may significantly lower downtime. Moreover, ECAS fogging can be easily adapted to a variety of applications, including the elimination of pathogens from livestock farm air environment for disease prevention, as well as decontamination after disease outbreaks

Correction: Alhamami et al. First emergence of resistance to macrolides and tetracycline identified in Mannheimia haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida isolates from beef feedlots in Australia. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1322

The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper..

First Emergence of Resistance to Macrolides and Tetracycline Identified in Mannheimia haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida Isolates from Beef Feedlots in Australia

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) causes high morbidity and mortality in beef cattle worldwide. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) monitoring of BRD pathogens is critical to promote appropriate antimicrobial stewardship in veterinary medicine for optimal treatment and control. Here, the susceptibility of Mannheimia haemolytica and Pasteurella multicoda isolates obtained from BRD clinical cases (deep lung swabs at post-mortem) among feedlots in four Australian states (2014-2019) was determined for 19 antimicrobial agents. The M. haemolytica isolates were pan-susceptible to all tested agents apart from a single macrolide-resistant isolate (1/88; 1.1%) from New South Wales (NSW). Much higher frequencies of P. multocida isolates were resistant to tetracycline (18/140; 12.9%), tilmicosin (19/140; 13.6%), tulathromycin/gamithromycin (17/140; 12.1%), and ampicillin/penicillin (6/140; 4.6%). Five P. multocida isolates (3.6%), all obtained from NSW in 2019, exhibited dual resistance to macrolides and tetracycline, and a further two Queensland isolates from 2019 (1.4%) exhibited a multidrug-resistant phenotype to ampicillin/penicillin, tetracycline, and tilmicosin. Random-amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) typing identified a high degree of genetic homogeneity among the M. haemolytica isolates, whereas P. multocida isolates were more heterogeneous. Illumina whole genome sequencing identified the genes msr(E) and mph(E)encoding macrolide resistance, tet(R)-tet(H) or tet(Y) encoding tetracycline resistance, and blaROB-1 encoding ampicillin/penicillin resistance in all isolates exhibiting a corresponding resistant phenotype. The exception was the tilmicosin-resistant, tulathromycin/gamithromycin-susceptible phenotype identified in two Queensland isolates, the genetic basis of which could not be determined. These results confirm the first emergence of AMR in M. haemolytica and P. multocida from BRD cases in Australia, which should be closely monitored

Correction: Alhamami et al. First Emergence of Resistance to Macrolides and Tetracycline Identified in Mannheimia haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida Isolates from Beef Feedlots in Australia. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1322

The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [1]: There are metadata errors in Supplementary Figure S2 and Table 8, which state that isolate 17BRD-035 was isolated from a feedlot in NSW when in fact it came from Queensland. Figure S2 in Supplementary Materials was changed accordingly and was included with a separate document: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms9061322/s1 In Table 8, the ST column for strain P. m 17BRD-035 was changed from NSW to QLD, the correct Table 8 is as follows: Table 8. Resistance profile, RAPD pattern and presence of antimicrobial resistance genes among isolates of Pasteurella multocida (P. m) (n = 28) and Mannheimia haemolytica (M. h) (n = 1) +, present, −, absent. Table (see supplement) The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original article has been updated

In vitro antimicrobial activity of robenidine, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and polymyxin B nonapeptide against important human and veterinary pathogens

The emergence and global spread of antimicrobial resistance among bacterial pathogens demand alternative strategies to treat life-threatening infections. Combination drugs and repurposing of old compounds with known safety profiles that are not currently used in human medicine can address the problem of multidrug-resistant infections and promote antimicrobial stewardship in veterinary medicine. In this study, the antimicrobial activity of robenidine alone or in combination with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or polymyxin B nonapeptide (PMBN) against Gram-negative bacterial pathogens, including those associated with canine otitis externa and human skin and soft tissue infection, was evaluated in vitro using microdilution susceptibility testing and the checkerboard method. Fractional inhibitory concentration indices (FICIs) and dose reduction indices (DRI) of the combinations against tested isolates were determined. Robenidine alone was bactericidal against Acinetobacter baumannii [minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) mode = 8 μg/ml] and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (MIC mode = 2 μg/ml). Against Acinetobacter spp., an additivity/indifference of the combination of robenidine/EDTA (0.53 > FICIs > 1.06) and a synergistic effect of the combination of robenidine/PMBN (0.5 < FICI) were obtained. DRIs of robenidine were significantly increased in the presence of both EDTA and PMBN from 2- to 2048-fold. Robenidine exhibited antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, in the presence of sub-inhibitory concentrations of either EDTA or PMBN. Robenidine also demonstrated potent antibacterial activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens and all Gram-negative pathogens isolated from cases of canine otitis externa in the presence of EDTA. Robenidine did not demonstrate antibiofilm activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. EDTA facilitated biofilm biomass degradation for both Gram-positives and Gram-negatives. The addition of robenidine to EDTA was not associated with any change in the effect on biofilm biomass degradation. The combination of robenidine with EDTA or PMBN has potential for further exploration and pharmaceutical development, such as incorporation into topical and otic formulations for animal and human use.Manouchehr Khazandi, Hongfei Pi, Wei Yee Chan, Abiodun David Ogunniyi, Jowenna Xiao Feng Sim, Henrietta Venter, Sanjay Garg, Stephen W. Page, Peter B. Hill, Adam McCluskey, and Darren J. Trot

Discovery of 4,6-bis(2-((E)-benzylidene)hydrazinyl)pyrimidin-2-Amine with antibiotic activity

Robenidine (E)-N'-((E)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)ethylidene)-2-(1-(4-chlorophenyl)ethylidene)hydrazine-1-carboximidhydrazide displays methicillin-resistant Staphyoccoccus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) MICs of 2 μg mL-1. Herein we describe the structure-activity relationship development of a novel series of guanidine to 2-aminopyrimidine isosteres that ameliorate the low levels of mammalian cytotoxicity in the lead compound while retaining good antibiotic activity. Removal of the 2-NH2 pyrimidine moiety renders these analogues inactive. Introduction of a central 2-NH2 triazine moiety saw a 10-fold activity reduction. Phenyl to cyclohexyl isosteres were inactive. The 4-BrPh and 4-CH3Ph with MIC values of 2 and 4 μg mL-1, against MRSA and VRE respectively, are promising candidates for future development.Cecilia C. Russe, Andrew Stevens, Kelly A. Young, Jennifer R. Baker ... Manouchehr Khazandi ... Abiodun Ogunniyi ... et al

In vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Robenidine, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid and Polymyxin B Nonapeptide Against Important Human and Veterinary Pathogens

The emergence and global spread of antimicrobial resistance among bacterial pathogens demand alternative strategies to treat life-threatening infections. Combination drugs and repurposing of old compounds with known safety profiles that are not currently used in human medicine can address the problem of multidrug-resistant infections and promote antimicrobial stewardship in veterinary medicine. In this study, the antimicrobial activity of robenidine alone or in combination with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or polymyxin B nonapeptide (PMBN) against Gram-negative bacterial pathogens, including those associated with canine otitis externa and human skin and soft tissue infection, was evaluated in vitro using microdilution susceptibility testing and the checkerboard method. Fractional inhibitory concentration indices (FICIs) and dose reduction indices (DRI) of the combinations against tested isolates were determined. Robenidine alone was bactericidal against Acinetobacter baumannii [minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) mode = 8 μg/ml] and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (MIC mode = 2 μg/ml). Against Acinetobacter spp., an additivity/indifference of the combination of robenidine/EDTA (0.53 &gt; FICIs &gt; 1.06) and a synergistic effect of the combination of robenidine/PMBN (0.5 &lt; FICI) were obtained. DRIs of robenidine were significantly increased in the presence of both EDTA and PMBN from 2- to 2048-fold. Robenidine exhibited antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, in the presence of sub-inhibitory concentrations of either EDTA or PMBN. Robenidine also demonstrated potent antibacterial activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens and all Gram-negative pathogens isolated from cases of canine otitis externa in the presence of EDTA. Robenidine did not demonstrate antibiofilm activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. EDTA facilitated biofilm biomass degradation for both Gram-positives and Gram-negatives. The addition of robenidine to EDTA was not associated with any change in the effect on biofilm biomass degradation. The combination of robenidine with EDTA or PMBN has potential for further exploration and pharmaceutical development, such as incorporation into topical and otic formulations for animal and human use

The Eimeria-host cell interaction in broiler chickens

Coccidiosis is an enteric infection of chickens caused by protozoan parasites of the genus Eimeria. Coccidiosis is a worldwide disease with an economic impact on broiler chicken production. An outbreak of disease can reduce weight gain and feed digestion in the entire flock, reducing the production of processed meat for market. The major characteristics of Eimeria species are the invasion of specific sites in the intestine of chickens and specificity of the immune response. To date, prophylaxis and vaccination are used to control coccidiosis. However, the continuous use of chemotherapeutics has led to increased drug resistance by Eimeria. In the case of vaccination, immunity against Eimeria is species-specific, hence, there is a need to vaccinate chickens against all species of Eimeria for complete protection. The Eimeria-host cell interaction is the first stage in the reproductive cycle in chickens that produces the damage in the chicken intestine. A more complete understanding of the enviromnental factors within the intestinal tract that influence this interaction will be useful to control the disease. The lack of a suitable method to study the interaction between Eimeria and host cells derived from different areas of intestine has hampered our understanding of the disease. The cell type of interest for this study was the chicken enterocyte. A layer of mucus is secreted by goblet cells in the intestinal epithelial to protect the enterocytes. Eimeria sporozoites have to cross the mucus layer in order to invade the epithelial cells. It is reasonable to assume that this mucus may have some involvement in Eimeriaenterocyte attachment. The objectives of this study were to investigate the roles of the enterocyte and intestinal mucus in the attachment process and the subsequent penetration of host cells by Eimeria sporozoites. Newly hatched, and 3-week-old chickens, were killed and intestinal segments were collected for developing an in vitro method ex vivo ( organ culture system, isolated enterocytes and a frozen section method) to study the Eimeria interaction with intestinal epithelial cells. Eimeria sporozoites were .extracted from oocysts and then labelled with a fluorescent dye (PKH-67). The frozen section model was found to be superior to the ~se of isolated enterocytes and organ culture systems, and was used for subsequent experiments in this project. This method was used to investigate the Eimeria-enterocyte attachment at preferred and non-preferred sites on the surface of enterocyte membranes. Indeed, the use of this method demonstrated that D-galactose on the surface of sporozoites had an important role in the attachment of E. tenella sporozoites to caecal enterocytes, with caecal and duodenal mucus both functioning as a physical barrier to E. tenella. In addition, two other major developments resulted from this project, these being; the development of a PCR protocol that can specifically identify different Eimeria species in a mixed sample containing at least 0.05 ng/μl of Eimeria DNA and a propidium iodide method that is a suitable indicator tool to assess the viability of oocysts and sporocysts. Finally, the inclusion of MgCh in the extraction buffer increases the hatchability of sporozoites from sporocysts. In conclusion, this study led to development of a frozen section method which can be used ex vivo to investigate further the role of mucus from vaccinated and non-vaccinated chickens, diets with different compositions, anticoccidial drugs, and the identification of the specific receptors in different areas of the chicken intestine. Finally, the propidium iodide method in combination with the PCR protocols can be used as a quality assurance tool in the production of Eimeria vaccines.Thesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, Dept. of Agriculture and Animal Science, 200

Developing an in vitro method for Eimeria tenella attachment to its preferred and non-preferred intestinal sites

A frozen section method utilising chicken intestinal tissue was developed to study the Eimeria tenella attachment ex vivo. In order to examine Eimeria-epithelial cell attachment, 10(5) E. tenella sporozoites were incubated with each caecal frozen section (6, 10 and 14 microm) for 1h in 5% CO2 incubator at 41 degrees C. E. tenella sporozoites attached successfully to enterocytes in 14 microm thick of caecal sections. Sporozoite attachment to caecal sections was shown to be dependent on the number of parasites added. To evaluate the method, E. tenella sporozoites were incubated to its preferred (caecum) and non-preferred (duodenum and jejunum) intestinal sites. The number of sporozoites attached to the caecal enterocytes was significantly greater (P<0.0001) in comparison with the limited number of sporozoites attached to enterocytes of non-preferred intestinal sites. This method was shown to be able to reveal differences in binding capability and allows for comparison of intestinal site attachment.Manouchehr Khazandi and David Tive