Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor: A Multifunctional Cytokine in Rheumatic Diseases

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) was originally identified in the culture medium of activated T lymphocytes as a soluble factor that inhibited the random migration of macrophages. MIF is now recognized to be a multipotent cytokine involved in the regulation of immune and inflammatory responses. Moreover, the pivotal nature of its involvement highlights the importance of MIF to the pathogenesis of various inflammatory disorders and suggests that blocking MIF may be a useful therapeutic strategy for treating these diseases. This paper discusses the function and expressional regulation of MIF in several rheumatic diseases and related conditions

The Incidence of Proximal Extension of Ulcerative Proctitis in Japan and Factors Related to Proximal Extension

The incidence of proximal extension in patients with ulcerative proctitis is reported to be 18%-46%, but recent data on the incidence in Japan is inadequate. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of proximal extension of ulcerative proctitis and factors associated with the extension in Japan. This is a retrospective observational study involving a cohort of 53 patients with an initial diagnosis of ulcerative proctitis. Following verification of the diagnoses, demographic and clinical data were compiled. The cumulative incidence of proximal extension was estimated as ‘person-years’ and cumulative probability was calculated by the Kaplan-Meyer method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify association factors. During a mean follow-up of 6.8 years, proximal extension was observed in 14 patients (26.4%). The cumulative incidence of proximal extension was 4.22/100 person-years and the cumulative probability at 5 years was 20.1%, consistent with recent reports from Western countries and data obtained in Japan over 2 decades ago. Univariate analysis showed active smoking (P = 0.025) and corticosteroid therapy (P = 0.006) to be risk factors in proximal extension, however multivariate analysis revealed that corticosteroid therapy was the only significant factor (P = 0.005) separating patients with and without proximal extension. No patient underwent colectomy. The incidence of proximal extension in ulcerative proctitis in Japan is comparable to that in Western countries and has not changed significantly over the past two decades. Corticosteroid therapy was identified as the only significant factor in proximal extension

A new unifying heuristic algorithm for the undirected minimum cut problems using minimum range cut algorithms

AbstractGiven a connected undirected multigraph with n vertices and m edges, we first propose a new unifying heuristic approach to approximately solving the minimum cut and the s-t minimum cut problems by using efficient algorithms for the corresponding minimum range cut problems. Our method is based on the association of the range value of a cut and its cut value when each edge weight is chosen uniformly randomly from the fixed interval. Our computational experiments demonstrate that this approach produces very good approximate solutions. We shall also propose an O(log2 n) time parallel algorithm using O(n2) processors on an arbitrary CRCW PRAM model for the minimum range cut problems, by which we can efficiently obtain approximate minimum cuts in poly-log time using a polynomial number of processors

A Comparison of Magnifying Chromoendoscopy Versus Narrow Band Imaging in the Diagnosis of Depth of Invasion for Early Colorectal Cancers

Although chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging (NBI) are widely used in diagnosing the invasion depth of colorectal cancers, comparative studies of these modalities are lacking. This meta-analysis compared the performance of these two modalities in colorectal cancer diagnosis. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant original articles published up to December 20th, 2010. Major criteria for article inclusion were: (i) magnifying chromoendoscopy or NBI was used as a diagnostic modality and pit pattern or vascular pattern was used as a diagnostic classification; (ii) sensitivity and specificity were reported; (iii) absolute numbers of true-positive, false-positive, true-negative, and false-negative cases, or their equivalent, were provided; and (iv) pathology of biopsy, endoscopy, or surgical treatment was used as the reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a random effects model. Regression analysis was performed to compare the discriminatory power between chromoendoscopy and NBI by including a dummy variable. We made the assumption that a positive regression coefficient implied a better discriminatory power for NBI, and vice versa. Of 1846 screened articles, 16 fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivity for chromoendoscopy and NBI was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.87) and 0.80 (0.76-0.85), respectively, and specificity was 0.98 (0.97-0.99) and 0.98 (0.97-0.99), respectively. The regression coefficient for chromoendoscopy versus NBI was -0.02 (95%CI: -1.18-1.71). These results indicate that chromoendoscopy and NBI may have similar power for the diagnostic assessment of colonic neoplasms. However, other factors such as convenience, time, and cost still must be taken into account in making the final diagnostic choice

Comparison of Targeted vs Random Biopsies for Surveillance of Ulcerative Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer

Background & AimsA random biopsy is recommended for surveillance of ulcerative colitis (UC)-associated colorectal cancer. However, a targeted biopsy might be more effective. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare rates of neoplasia detection by targeted vs random biopsies in patients with UC.MethodsWe performed a study of 246 patients with UC for 7 years or more, seen at 52 institutions in Japan from October 1, 2008 through December 31, 2010. Patients were randomly assigned to the random group (4 random biopsies collected every 10 cm in addition to targeted biopsies, n = 122) or the target group (biopsies collected from locations of suspected neoplasia, n = 124). The primary end point was the number of neoplastic lesions detected in a single surveillance colonoscopy. We estimated the ratio and difference in the mean number of neoplastic lesions between the groups. We also evaluated the non-inferiority between the groups as an exploratory study. A non-inferiority margin of 0.65 (0.13 of 0.20) was considered for the ratio of the mean number of neoplastic lesions between groups.ResultsThe mean number of biopsies found to contain neoplastic tissue per colonoscopy was 0.211 (24 of 114) in the target group and 0.168 (18 of 107) in the random group (ratio of 1.251; 95% confidence interval, 0.679–2.306). The lower limit was above the non-inferiority margin of 0.65. Neoplasias were detected in 11.4% of patients in the target group and 9.3% of patients in the random group (P = .617). Larger numbers of biopsy samples per colonoscopy were collected in the random group (34.8 vs 3.1 in the target group; P < .001), and the total examination time was longer (41.7 vs 26.6 minutes in the target group; P < .001). In the random group, all neoplastic tissues found in random biopsies were collected from areas of the mucosa with a history or presence of inflammation.ConclusionsIn a randomized controlled trial, we found that targeted and random biopsies detect similar proportions of neoplasias. However, a targeted biopsy appears to be a more cost-effective method. Random biopsies from areas without any signs of present or past inflammation were not found to contain neoplastic tissues. Clinical Trial Registry: UMIN000001608