Treatment strategies for craniopharyngiomas

Craniopharyniomas arise from the sellar region and are particularly challenging because of their close proximity to critical neurovascular structures, including cranial nerves, brainstem, internal carotid arteries, posterior cerebral arteries, hypothalamus, and the pituitary gland. The tumors are benign on histology but can cause serious symptoms by compression of surrounding vital structures. While radical surgery and gross total resection (GTR) remains the first line treatment, choosing the optimal surgical approach is critical for the minimization of complications and post-operative morbidity. The extended endoscopic endonasal approach (EEEA) offers a direct route towards the sellar and suprasellar regions and has proven to be a safe and effective for GTR, with lower rates of complications and post-operative morbidity than open transcranial approaches. However, traditional transcranial approaches remain relevant in tumors with signficant lateral extension. Radiotherapy can be considered in cases of subtotal resection (STR) or if surgery is not possible, although progressive growth of cysts with neurological deterioration has been demonstrated no infrequently. Newly developed chemotherapy for papillary craniopharygniomas might expand treatment options in the future

Cost-effectiveness of forgoing postoperative catheter angiography after microsurgical occlusion of spinal dorsal intradural arteriovenous fistulas

OBJECTIVE: Spinal dorsal intradural arteriovenous fistulas (DI-AVFs) represent 70% of all spinal vascular lesions. Diagnostic tools include pre- and postoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and intraoperative indocyanine green videoangiography (ICG-VA). ICG-VA has a high predictive value in DI-AVF occlusion, but postoperative DSA remains a core component of postoperative protocols. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential cost reduction of forgoing postoperative DSA after microsurgical occlusion of DI-AVFs. METHODS: Cohort-based cost effectiveness study of all DI-AVF within a prospective, single-center cerebrovascular registry from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021. RESULTS: Complete data including intraoperative ICG-VA and costs were available for 11 patients. Mean (SD) age was 61.5 (14.8) years. All DI-AVFs were treated with microsurgical clip ligation of the draining vein. ICG-VA showed complete obliteration in all patients. Postoperative DSA was performed for 6 patients and confirmed complete obliteration. Mean (SD) cost contributions for DSA and ICG-VA were $11,417 ($4861) and $12 ($2), respectively. Mean (SD) total costs were $63,543 ($15,742) and $53,369 ($27,609) for patients who did and did not undergo postoperative DSA, respectively. Comorbidity status was identified as the main driver of total cost (p=0.01 after adjusting for postoperative DSA status). CONCLUSIONS: ICG-VA is a powerful diagnostic tool in demonstrating microsurgical cure of DI-AVFs, with a negative predictive value of 100%. Eliminating postoperative DSA in patients with confirmed DI-AVF obliteration on ICG-VA may yield substantial cost savings, in addition to sparing patients the risk and inconvenience of a potentially unnecessary invasive procedure

A taxonomy for deep cerebral cavernous malformations: subtypes of basal ganglia lesions

OBJECTIVE: Anatomical taxonomy is a practical tool that has successfully guided clinical decision-making for patients with brain arteriovenous malformations and brainstem cavernous malformations (CMs). Deep CMs are similarly complex lesions that are difficult to access and highly variable in size, shape, and position. The authors propose a novel taxonomy for deep CMs in the basal ganglia based on clinical presentation (syndromes) and anatomical location. METHODS: The taxonomy system was developed and applied to an extensive 2-surgeon experience over 19 years (2001-2019). Lesions involving the basal ganglia were identified and subtyped on the basis of the predominant superficial presentation identified on preoperative MRI. Three subtypes of basal ganglia CMs were defined: caudate (31, 57%), putaminal (16, 30%), and pallidal (7, 13%). Neurological outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Postoperative mRS scores ≤ 2 were defined as a favorable outcome, and scores \u3e 2 were defined as a poor outcome. Clinical and surgical characteristics and neurological outcomes were compared among subtypes. RESULTS: Fifty-four basal ganglia lesions were identified in 54 patients. Each basal ganglia CM subtype was associated with a recognizable constellation of neurological symptoms. The most common symptoms at presentation were severe or worsening headaches (25, 43%), mild hemiparesis (13, 24%), seizures (7, 13%), and dysmetria or ataxia (6, 11%). Patients with caudate CMs were the most likely to present with headaches and constitutional symptoms. Patients with putaminal CMs were the most likely to present with hemibody sensory deficits and dysmetria or ataxia. Patients with pallidal CMs were the most likely to present with mild hemiparesis and visual field deficits. A single surgical approach was preferred (\u3e 80% of cases) for each basal ganglia subtype: caudate (contralateral transcallosal-transventricular, 28/31, 90%), putaminal (transsylvian-anterior transinsular, 13/16, 81%), and pallidal (transsylvian supracarotid-infrafrontal, 7/7, 100%). Most patients with follow-up had stable or improved mRS scores postoperatively (94%, 44/47); mRS scores of \u3e 2 at final follow-up did not differ among the 3 basal ganglia subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms the authors\u27 hypothesis that this taxonomy for basal ganglia CMs meaningfully guides the selection of surgical approach and resection strategy. Furthermore, the proposed taxonomy can increase the diagnostic acumen at the patient bedside, help identify optimal surgical approaches, enhance the consistency of clinical communications and publications, and improve patient outcomes

Giant cerebral cavernous malformations: redefinition based on surgical outcomes and systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE: Giant cerebral cavernous malformations (GCCMs) are rare vascular malformations. Unlike for tumors and aneurysms, there is no clear definition of a giant cavernous malformation (CM). As a result of variable definitions, working descriptions and outcome data of patients with GCCM are unclear. A new definition of GCCM related to surgical outcomes is needed. METHODS: An institutional database was searched for all patients who underwent resection of CMs \u3e 1 cm in diameter. Patient information, surgical technique, and clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed. A systematic review was performed to augment an earlier published review. RESULTS: In the authors\u27 institutional cohort of 183 patients with a large CM, 179 with preoperative and postoperative modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were analyzed. A maximum CM diameter of ≥ 3 cm was associated with greater risk of severe postoperative decline (≥ 2-point increase in mRS score). After adjustment for age and deep versus superficial location, size ≥ 3 cm was strongly predictive of severe postoperative decline (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.2-16.9). A model with CM size and deep versus superficial location was developed to predict severe postoperative decline (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.79). Thirteen more patients with GCCMs have been reported in the literature since the most recent systematic review, including some patients who were treated earlier and not discussed in the previous review. CONCLUSIONS: The authors propose that cerebral CMs with a diameter ≥ 3 cm be defined as GCCMs on the basis of the inflection point for functional and neurological outcomes. This definition is in line with the definitions for other giant lesions. It is less exclusive than earlier definitions but captures the rarity of these lesions (approximately 1% incidence) and variation in outcomes. GCCMs remain operable with potentially favorable outcomes. The term giant is not meant to deter or contraindicate surgery

Cost Comparison of Microsurgery vs Endovascular Treatment for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Propensity-Adjusted Analysis

BACKGROUND: In specialized neurosurgical centers, open microsurgery is routinely performed for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost of endovascular vs microsurgical treatment for aSAH at a single quaternary center. METHODS: All patients undergoing aSAH treatment from July 1, 2014, to July 31, 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped based on primary treatment (microsurgery vs endovascular treatment). The primary outcome was the difference in total cost (including hospital, discharge facility, and all follow-up) using a propensity-adjusted analysis. RESULTS: Of 384 patients treated for an aSAH, 234 (61%) were microsurgically treated and 150 (39%) were endovascularly treated. The mean cost of index hospitalization for these patients was marginally higher ($9504) for endovascularly treated patients ($103 980) than for microsurgically treated patients ($94 476) ( P = .047). For the subset of patients with follow-up data available, the mean total cost was$45 040 higher for endovascularly treated patients ($159 406, n = 59) than that for microsurgically treated patients ($114 366, n = 105) ( P \u3c .001). After propensity scoring (adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Hunt and Hess grade, Fisher grade, aneurysms, and type/size/location), linear regression analysis of patients with follow-up data available revealed that microsurgery was independently associated with healthcare costs that were $37 244 less than endovascular treatment costs ( P \u3c .001). An itemized cost analysis suggested that this discrepancy was due to differences in the rates of aneurysm retreatment and long-term surveillance. CONCLUSION: Microsurgical treatment for aSAH is associated with lower total healthcare costs than endovascular therapy. Aneurysm surveillance after endovascular treatments, retreatment, and device costs warrants attention in future studies

Sphenoparietal Sinus Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Series of 10 Patients

BACKGROUND: Dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) of the sphenoparietal sinus or sphenoid wing region are uncommon lesions with unique and interesting angioarchitecture. Understanding appropriate anatomy and recognizing patterns provide important treatment implications. OBJECTIVE: To describe a single surgeon\u27s experience with open surgical treatment of sphenoparietal sinus DAVFs, the surgical indications for this uncommon lesion, and the microsurgical techniques related to its treatment and to review the literature on its surgical treatment. METHODS: Consecutive cases of sphenoparietal sinus DAVF treatment conducted by a single surgeon over 24 years (1997-2020) were retrospectively reviewed. Published reports of similar cases were reviewed. RESULTS: Of 202 surgically treated DAVFs, 10 lesions in 10 patients were sphenoparietal sinus DAVFs. Four patients presented with intracranial hemorrhage, 3 with headache, and 2 with pulsatile tinnitus; 1 patient was incidentally identified as having a DAVF during treatment for a ruptured aneurysm. Most patients (7 of 10) had undergone endovascular embolization previously. Nine patients had Borden type III DAVFs and one had a Borden type II fistula. Surgery in all 10 patients resulted in angiographically confirmed fistula obliteration. Clinical outcomes at the last follow-up, measured by a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, were excellent in 6 patients (mRS ≤ 2) and poor in 1 patient (mRS ≥ 3); late outcomes were not available for 3 patients. CONCLUSION: Sphenoparietal sinus DAVFs are an uncommon anatomic subtype. Careful attention to angiographic detail leads to identification of the site of venous interruption and results in a high rate of surgical cure with excellent clinical outcomes

Back to basal: contemporary cerebrovascular cohort study of the supratentorial-infraoccipital approach

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper was to assess applications of the supratentorial-infraoccipital (STIO) approach for cerebrovascular neurosurgery. METHODS: The authors conducted a cohort study of all consecutive cases in which the STIO approach was used during the study period, December 1995 to January 2021, as well as a systematic review of the literature. RESULTS: Twenty-five cerebrovascular cases were identified in which the STIO approach was used. Diagnoses included arteriovenous malformation (n = 15), cerebral cavernous malformation (n = 5), arteriovenous fistula (n = 4), and aneurysm (n = 1). The arteriovenous malformations consisted of Spetzler-Martin grade II (n = 3), grade III (n = 8), and grade IV (n = 4) lesions. Lesion locations included the occipital lobe (n = 15), followed by the tentorial dural (n = 4), temporal-occipital (n = 3), temporal (n = 1), thalamic (n = 1), and quadrigeminal cistern (n = 1) regions. Many patients (75%) experienced transient visual deficits attributable to retraction of the occipital lobe, all of which resolved. As of last follow-up (n = 12), modified Rankin Scale scores had improved for 6 patients and were unchanged for 6 patients compared with the preoperative baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The STIO approach is a safe and effective skull base approach that provides a specialized access corridor for appropriately selected cerebrovascular lesions