6 research outputs found
Mean ratings of potential of patient harm, discomfort to speak up, decision difficulty and likelihood of speaking up for the four clinical frames by managerial function of respondent.
<p>Mean ratings of potential of patient harm, discomfort to speak up, decision difficulty and likelihood of speaking up for the four clinical frames by managerial function of respondent.</p
Results of multiple regression analysis with reported likelihood of speaking up as outcome.
<p>Results of multiple regression analysis with reported likelihood of speaking up as outcome.</p
Characteristics of survey responders (nβ=β1013).
<p>Characteristics of survey responders (nβ=β1013).</p
Mean ratings of harm, discomfort, decision difficulty and likelihood of speaking up across vignettes, by clinical frame.
<p>Nβ=β1013 participants; nβ=β4052 vignette evaluations;</p>#<p>higher values indicate higher levels of potential for patient harm, feeling less comfortable to speak up, higher decision difficulty, and higher likelihood of speaking up.</p><p>*responders with rating >4; <sup>+</sup>mean across the 8 vignettes within each frame.</p
Additional file 1: of Using the theory of planned behaviour to model antecedents of surgical checklist use: a cross-sectional study
Testing for measurement invariance. (DOCX 20 kb