Mean ratings of potential of patient harm, discomfort to speak up, decision difficulty and likelihood of speaking up for the four clinical frames by managerial function of respondent.

<p>Mean ratings of potential of patient harm, discomfort to speak up, decision difficulty and likelihood of speaking up for the four clinical frames by managerial function of respondent.</p

Example vignette.

<p>Example vignette.</p

Results of multiple regression analysis with reported likelihood of speaking up as outcome.

<p>Results of multiple regression analysis with reported likelihood of speaking up as outcome.</p

Characteristics of survey responders (n = 1013).

<p>Characteristics of survey responders (n = 1013).</p

Mean ratings of harm, discomfort, decision difficulty and likelihood of speaking up across vignettes, by clinical frame.

<p>N = 1013 participants; n = 4052 vignette evaluations;</p>#<p>higher values indicate higher levels of potential for patient harm, feeling less comfortable to speak up, higher decision difficulty, and higher likelihood of speaking up.</p><p>*responders with rating >4; ⁺mean across the 8 vignettes within each frame.</p

Additional file 1: of Using the theory of planned behaviour to model antecedents of surgical checklist use: a cross-sectional study

Testing for measurement invariance. (DOCX 20 kb