Allogeneic transplantation provides durable remission in a subset of DLBCL patients relapsing after autologous transplantation

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/133605/1/bjh14046.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/133605/2/bjh14046_am.pd

Allogeneic Transplantation Provides Durable Remission in a Subset of DLBCL Patients Relapsing after Autologous Transplantation

For diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients progressing after autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT), allogeneic HCT (alloHCT) is often considered, although limited information is available to guide patient selection. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we identified 503 patients who underwent alloHCT after disease progression/relapse following a prior autoHCT. The 3-year probabilities of non-relapse mortality, progression/relapse, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 30, 38, 31 and 37% respectively. Factors associated with inferior PFS on multivariate analysis included Karnofsky performance status (KPS) <80, chemoresistance, autoHCT to alloHCT interval <1-year and myeloablative conditioning. Factors associated with worse OS on multivariate analysis included KPS<80, chemoresistance and myeloablative conditioning. Three adverse prognostic factors were used to construct a prognostic model for PFS, including KPS<80 (4 points), autoHCT to alloHCT interval <1-year (2 points) and chemoresistant disease at alloHCT (5 points). This CIBMTR prognostic model classified patients into four groups: low-risk (0 points), intermediate-risk (2-5 points), high-risk (6-9 points) or very high-risk (11 points), predicting 3-year PFS of 40, 32, 11 and 6%, respectively, with 3-year OS probabilities of 43, 39, 19 and 11% respectively. In conclusion, the CIBMTR prognostic model identifies a subgroup of DLBCL patients experiencing long-term survival with alloHCT after a failed prior autoHCT

Late Effects in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients with Acquired Severe Aplastic Anemia: A Report from the Late Effects Working Committee of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research

With improvements in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) outcomes for severe aplastic anemia (SAA), there is a growing population of SAA survivors after HCT. However, there is a paucity of information regarding late effects that occur after HCT in SAA survivors. This study describes the malignant and nonmalignant late effects in survivors with SAA after HCT. A descriptive analysis was conducted of 1718 patients post-HCT for acquired SAA between 1995 and 2006 reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). the prevalence and cumulative incidence estimates of late effects are reported for 1-year HCT survivors with SAA. of the HCT recipients, 1176 (68.5%) and 542 (31.5%) patients underwent a matched sibling donor (MSD) or unrelated donor (URD) HCT, respectively. the median age at the time of HCT was 20 years. the median interval from diagnosis to transplantation was 3 months for MSD HCT and 14 months for URD HCT. the median follow-up was 70 months and 67 months for MSD and URD HCT survivors, respectively. Overall survival at I year, 2 years, and 5 years for the entire cohort was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 74-78), 73% (95% CI: 71-75), and 70% (95% CI: 68-72). Among 1-year survivors of MSD HCT, 6% had 1 late effect and 1% had multiple late effects. for 1-year survivors of URD HCT, 13% had 1 late effect and 2% had multiple late effects. Among survivors of MSD HCT, the cumulative incidence estimates of developing late effects were all <3% and did not increase over time. in contrast, for recipients of URD HCT, the cumulative incidence of developing several late effects exceeded 3% by 5 years: gonadal dysfunction 10.5% (95% CI: 7.3-14.3), growth disturbance 7.2% (95% CI: 4.4-10.7), avascular necrosis 6.3% (95% CI: 3.6-9.7), hypothyroidism 5.5% (95% CI: 2.8-9.0), and cataracts 5.1% (95% CI: 2.9-8.0). Our results indicated that all patients undergoing HCT for SAA remain at risk for late effects, must be counseled about, and should be monitored for late effects for the remainder of their lives.Public Health Service Grant from the National Cancer InstituteNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Cancer InstituteHealth Resources and Services Administration/Department of Health and Human ServicesOffice of Naval ResearchAllosAmgenAngioblastChildrens Hosp Orange Cty, Dept Hematol, Orange, CA 92668 USACIBMTR Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Biostat, Milwaukee, WI USAMed Coll Wisconsin, CIBMTR Stat Ctr, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USAKing Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Oncol, Riyadh 11211, Saudi ArabiaNew York Med Coll, Dept Pediat Hematol Oncol & Stem Cell Transplanta, Valhalla, NY 10595 USAStemcyte, Covina, CA USADana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Pediat Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USAUniv Florida, Dept Hematol Oncol, Gainesville, FL USAPrincess Margaret Hosp, Dept Med, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, CanadaUniv S Florida, All Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat Hematol & Oncol, St Petersburg, FL 33701 USAUniv Basel Hosp, Dept Hematol, CH-4031 Basel, SwitzerlandOregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Portland, OR 97201 USAChildrens Natl Med Ctr, Dept Blood & Marrow Transplantat, Washington, DC 20010 USABaylor Coll Med, Ctr Cell Therapy, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USAUniv N Carolina Hosp, Dept Pediat, Chapel Hill, NC USAUniv Hosp Case, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Cleveland, OH USAUniv Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Little Rock, AR 72205 USACincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Dept Bone Marrow Transplantat & Immune Deficiency, Cincinnati, OH USATufts Med Ctr, Dept Med & Pediat, Boston, MA USAUniv S Florida, Coll Med, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Tampa, FL 33612 USAFlorida Ctr Cellular Therapy, Dept Med, Orlando, FL USAUniv Fed Parana, Dept Bone Marrow Transplantat, BR-80060000 Curitiba, Parana, BrazilVanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Nashville, TN USAInst Oncol Pediat, Dept Pediat, São Paulo, BrazilFred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Dept Clin Res & Transplantat, Seattle, WA 98104 USAMt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Bone Marrow & Stem Cell Transplantat, New York, NY 10029 USAUniv N Carolina Hosp, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Chapel Hill, NC USAUniv Manitoba, CancerCare Manitoba, Dept Manitoba Blood & Marrow Transplant Program, Winnipeg, MB, CanadaKarolinska Univ Hosp, Ctr Allogene Stem Cell Transplantat, Dept Pediat, Stockholm, SwedenLouisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, New Orleans, LA USADept Natl Marrow Donor Program, Minneapolis, MN USAPublic Health Service Grant from the National Cancer Institute: U24-CA76518National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: 5U01HL069294Office of Naval Research: N00014-06-1-0704Office of Naval Research: N00014-08-1-0058HHSH234200637015CWeb of Scienc

Graft-versus-host disease in recipients of male unrelated donor compared with parous female sibling donor transplants

Optimal donor selection is critical for successful allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Donor sex and parity are well-established risk factors for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), with male donors typically associated with lower rates of GVHD. Well-matched unrelated donors (URDs) have also been associated with increased risks of GVHD as compared with matched sibling donors. These observations raise the question of whether male URDs would lead to more (or less) favorable transplant outcomes as compared with parous female sibling donors. We used the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry to complete a retrospective cohort study in adults with acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndrome, who underwent T-cell replete HCT from these 2 donor types (parous female sibling or male URD) between 2000 and 2012. Primary outcomes included grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD (aGVHD), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), and overall survival. Secondary outcomes included disease-free survival, transplant-related mortality, and relapse. In 2813 recipients, patients receiving male URD transplants (n = 1921) had 1.6 times higher risk of grade 2 to 4 aGVHD (P \u3c .0001). For cGVHD, recipient sex was a significant factor, so donor/recipient pairs were evaluated. Female recipients of male URD grafts had a higher risk of cGVHD than those receiving parous female sibling grafts (relative risk [RR] = 1.43, P \u3c .0001), whereas male recipients had similar rates of cGVHD regardless of donor type (RR = 1.09, P = .23). Donor type did not significantly affect any other end point. We conclude that when available, parous female siblings are preferred over male URDs

Improved survival after acute graft-

A cute graft- versus -host disease remains a major threat to a successful outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. While improvements in treatment and supportive care have occurred, it is unknown whether these advances have resulted in improved outcome specifically among those diagnosed with acute graft- versus -host disease. We examined outcome following diagnosis of grade II-IV acute graft- versus -host disease according to time period, and explored effects according to original graft- versus -host disease prophylaxis regimen and maximum overall grade of acute graft- versus -host disease. Between 1999 and 2012, 2,905 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (56%), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (30%) or myelodysplastic syndromes (14%) received a sibling (24%) or unrelated donor (76%) blood (66%) or marrow (34%) transplant and developed grade II-IV acute graft- versus -host disease (n=497 for 1999-2001, n=962 for 2002-2005, n=1,446 for 2006-2010). The median (range) follow-up was 144 (4-174), 97 (4-147) and 60 (8-99) months for 1999-2001, 2002-2005, and 2006-2010, respectively. Among the cohort with grade II-IV acute graft- versus -host disease, there was a decrease in the proportion of grade III-IV disease over time with 56%, 47%, and 37% for 1999-2001, 2002-2005, and 2006-2012, respectively ( P <0.001). Considering the total study population, univariate analysis demonstrated significant improvements in overall survival and treatment-related mortality over time, and deaths from organ failure and infection declined. On multivariate analysis, significant improvements in overall survival ( P =0.003) and treatment-related mortality ( P =0.008) were only noted among those originally treated with tacrolimus-based graft- versus -host disease prophylaxis, and these effects were most apparent among those with overall grade II acute graft- versus -host disease. In conclusion, survival has improved over time for tacrolimus-treated transplant recipients with acute graft- versus -host disease

Comparative analysis of calcineurin-inhibitor-based methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil-containing regimens for prevention of Graft-versus-Host Disease after reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation

The combination of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) such as tacrolimus (TAC) or cyclosporine (CYSP) with methotrexate (MTX) or with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been commonly used for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), but there are limited data comparing efficacy of the 2 regimens. We evaluated 1564 adult patients who underwent RIC alloHCT for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) from 2000 to 2013 using HLA-identical sibling (matched related donor [MRD]) or unrelated donor (URD) peripheral blood graft and received CYSP or TAC with MTX or MMF for GVHD prophylaxis. Primary outcomes of the study were acute and chronic GVHD and overall survival (OS). The study divided the patient population into 4 cohorts based on regimen: MMF-TAC, MMF-CYSP, MTX-TAC, and MTX-CYSP. In the URD group, MMF-CYSP was associated with increased risk of grade II to IV acute GVHD (relative risk [RR], 1.78; P < .001) and grade III to IV acute GVHD (RR, 1.93; P = .006) compared with MTX-TAC. In the URD group, use of MMF-TAC (versus MTX-TAC) lead to higher nonrelapse mortality. (hazard ratio, 1.48; P = .008). In either group, no there was no difference in chronic GVHD, disease-free survival, and OS among the GVHD prophylaxis regimens. For RIC alloHCT using MRD, there are no differences in outcomes based on GVHD prophylaxis. However, with URD RIC alloHCT, MMF-CYSP was inferior to MTX-based regimens for acute GVHD prevention, but all the regimens were equivalent in terms of chronic GVHD and OS. Prospective studies, targeting URD recipients are needed to confirm these results

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Outcomes in Monosomal Karyotype Myeloid Malignancies

The presence of monosomal karyotype (MK+) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with dismal outcomes. We evaluated the impact of MK+ in AML (MK+AML, N=240) and in myelodysplastic syndrome (MK+MDS, N=221) on hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes compared to other cytogenetically defined groups (AML, N=3,360; MDS, N=1,373) as reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) from 1998 to 2011. MK+AML was associated with higher disease relapse (hazard ratio [HR] 1.98, p<0.01), similar transplant related mortality (TRM, HR 1.01, p=0.9) and worse survival (HR 1.67, p<0.01) compared to other cytogenetically defined AML. Among patients with MDS, MK+MDS was associated with higher disease relapse (HR 2.39, p<0.01), higher TRM (HR 1.80, p<0.01) and worse survival (HR 2.02, p<0.01). Subset analyses comparing chromosome 7 abnormalities (del7/7q) with or without MK+ demonstrated higher mortality for MK+ disease in for both AML (HR 1.72, p<0.01) and MDS (HR1.79, p<0.01). The strong negative impact of MK+ in myeloid malignancies was observed in all age groups and using either myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning regimens. Alternative approaches to mitigate disease relapse in this population are needed

Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Children and Young Adults with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A CIBMTR Cohort Analysis

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in children and young adults is uncommon. Young patients have long life expectancies and low morbidity with hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Prolonged tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) use may cause significant morbidity. In addition indication for HCT in patients in first chronic phase is not established

Significant Improvements in the Practice Patterns of Adult Related Donor Care in US Transplantation Centers

Recent investigations have found a higher incidence of adverse events associated with hematopoietic cell donation in related donors (RDs) who have morbidities that if present in an unrelated donor (UD) would preclude donation. In the UD setting, regulatory standards ensure independent assessment of donors, one of several crucial measures to safeguard donor health and safety. A survey conducted by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Donor Health and Safety Working Committee in 2007 reported a potential conflict of interest in >70% US centers, where physicians had simultaneous responsibility for RDs and their recipients. Consequently, several international organizations have endeavored to improve practice through regulations and consensus recommendations. We hypothesized that the changes in the 2012 FACT-JACIE Standards, resulting from the CIBMTR study, will have significantly impacted practice. Accordingly, a follow-up survey of US transplant centers was conducted to assess practice changes since 2007, and investigate additional areas where RD care was predicted to differ from UD care. 73 centers (53%), performing 79% of US RD transplants responded. Significant improvements were observed since the earlier survey; 62% centers now ensure separation of RD and recipient care (P<0.0001). However, this study identifies several areas where RD management does not meet international donor care standards. Particular concerns include counseling and assessment of donors before HLA typing, with 61% centers first disclosing donor HLA results to an individual other than the donor, the use of unlicensed mobilization agents, and the absence of long-term donor follow-up. Recommendations for improvement are described