6 research outputs found
Knowledge and perceptions of Alzheimer’s disease in three ethnic groups of younger adults in the United Kingdom
Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a global public health problem with an ageing population. Knowledge is essential to promote early awareness, diagnosis and treatment of AD symptoms. AD knowledge is influenced by many cultural factors including cultural beliefs, attitudes and language barriers. This study aims: (1) to define AD knowledge level and perceptions amongst adults between 18 and 49 years of age in the UK; (2) to compare knowledge and perceptions of AD among three main ethnic groups (Asian, Blacks, and Whites); and (3) to assess potential associations of age, gender, education level, affinity with older people (65 or over), family history and caregiving history with AD knowledge. Methods: Data was collected from 186 participants as a convenience sample of younger adults of three different ethnicities (16.1% Asian, 16.7% Black, 67.2% White), living in the UK, recruited via an online research platform. The majority of the participants were in the 18–34 years age group (87.6%). Demographic characteristics of participants and AD knowledge correlation were assessed by the 30-item Alzheimer’s Disease Knowledge Scale (ADKS), comprising 7 content domains. ANOVA/ANCOVA were used to assess differences in AD knowledge by ethnicity, gender, education level, age and affinity with dementia and Alzheimer’s patients. Results: For AD general knowledge across all respondents only 45.0% answers were correct. No significant differences were found for the total ADKS score between ethnicities in this younger age group, who did not differ in education level. However, there were significant knowledge differences for the ADKS symptom domain score even after controlling for other demographics variables such as gender, education level (p = 0.005). White respondents were more likely to know about AD symptoms than their Black counterparts (p = 0.026). Conclusion: The study’s findings suggest that the AD knowledge level is not adequate for all ethnic groups. Meanwhile, significant differences were observed in symptoms, between ethnic groups, and therefore, differ in their needs regards health communication. The study contributes to an understanding of ethnicity differences in AD knowledge amongst adults from 18 to 49 years of age in the UK and may also provide input into an intervention plan for different ethnicities’ information needs
Population attributable fractions of modifiable risk factors for dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: More than 57 million people have dementia worldwide. Evidence indicates a change in dementia prevalence and incidence in high-income countries, which is likely to be due to improved life-course population health. Identifying key modifiable risk factors for dementia is essential for informing risk reduction and prevention strategies. We therefore aimed to estimate the population attributable fraction (PAF) for dementia associated with modifiable risk factors. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO, via Ovid, from database inception up to June 29, 2023, for population-derived or community-based studies and reviews reporting a PAF value for one or more modifiable risk factor for later-life dementia (prevalent or incident dementia in people aged ≥60 years), with no restrictions on dementia subtype, the sex or baseline age of participants, or the period of study. Articles were independently screened for inclusion by four authors, with disagreements resolved through consensus. Data including unweighted and weighted PAF values (weighted to account for communality or overlap in risk) were independently extracted into a predefined template by two authors and checked by two other authors. When five or more unique studies investigated a given risk factor or combination of the same factors, random-effects meta-analyses were used to calculate a pooled PAF percentage estimate for the factor or combination of factors. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO, CRD42022323429. Findings: 4024 articles were identified, and 74 were included in our narrative synthesis. Overall, PAFs were reported for 61 modifiable risk factors, with sufficient data available for meta-analysis of 12 factors (n=48 studies). In meta-analyses, the highest pooled unweighted PAF values were estimated for low education (17·2% [95% CI 14·4–20·0], p<0·0001), hypertension (15·8% [14·7–17·1], p<0·0001), hearing loss (15·6% [10·3–20·9], p<0·0001), physical inactivity (15·2% [12·8–17·7], p<0·0001), and obesity (9·4% [7·3–11·7], p<0·0001). According to weighted PAF values, low education (9·3% [6·9–11·7], p<0·0001), physical inactivity (7·3% [3·9–11·2], p=0·0021), hearing loss (7·2% [5·2–9·7], p<0·0001), hypertension (7·1% [5·4–8·8], p<0·0001), and obesity (5·3% [3·2–7·4], p=0·0001) had the highest pooled estimates. When low education, midlife hypertension, midlife obesity, smoking, physical inactivity, depression, and diabetes were combined (Barnes and Yaffe seven-factor model; n=9 studies), the pooled unweighted and weighted PAF values were 55·0% (46·5–63·5; p<0·0001) and 32·0% (26·6–37·5; p<0·0001), respectively. The pooled PAF values for most individual risk factors were higher in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) versus high-income countries. Interpretation: Governments need to invest in a life-course approach to dementia prevention, including policies that enable quality education, health-promoting environments, and improved health. This investment is particularly important in LMICs, where the potential for prevention is high, but resources, infrastructure, budgets, and research focused on ageing and dementia are limited. Funding: UK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council)
Bilateral peninsula-shaped linear craniectomy for mild degrees of craniosynostosis: indication, technique and long-term results
Objective: The goals of surgery in craniosynostosis are to reduce increased intracranial pressure and to achieve a good aesthetic result with minimal mortality and morbidity. A new type of strip craniectomy according to these principles is presented. Patients: The technique was applied to seven cases of oxycephaly and three cases of scaphocephaly under 5 years of age. None of them had major cranial base involvement, facial deformity or marked psychomotor retardation. There was no syndromic case of craniosynostosis included in this group. Methods: A curvilinear parasagittal craniectomy was combined with coronal and lambdoid craniectomies bilaterally. These craniectomies were curved postero- and antero-inferiorly, respectively, in order to create bilateral 'peninsula-shaped' parieto-temporal bones with their neck still attached to the temporal bone. A linear craniectomy, crossing the superior sagittal sinus and combining right and left curvilinear craniectomies was added. Results: The operative time varied between 45 min and 1 h, without any complications. Correction of the skull shape was successful in all cases. Conclusion: This technique is simple and effective. But, it is only applicable to a minority of craniosynostoses. Patient selection is the key to better results. (c) 2003 European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery