7 research outputs found
ΠΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ Π² ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ: ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Ρ
The review presents a discussion at the session of the Scientific Council of Moscow State University on the development of modern economic theory and Russian model of social and economic development. The session, held on November 28, 2019 at the Faculty of Economics in Lomonosov Moscow State University, was dedicated to two dates β the 215th anniversary of the Department of Political Economy and the 115th anniversary of N. A. Tsagolov. The topic of scientific discussion: βInterdisciplinary approach β the key to solving theoretical and practical problems of modern timeβ. During the discussion, issues related to interdisciplinary method in economic theory, University traditions and modern experience of interdisciplinary method in economic science were discussed. Speakers also concentrated on the problems of national political economy development, inseparably connected with the history of the Department of Political Economy at the Faculty of Economics in Moscow University. Special attention was paid to the period of the development of the Department under the leadership of N. A. Tsagolov and formation of the scientific school connected with his name. The discussion focused on the interdisciplinary approach developed by βTsagolov Schoolβ, the possibility of its development under the conditions of a new scientific and technological revolution, and its role in the effective study of economy and society in the twenty-first century.ΠΠ±Π·ΠΎΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ Π΄ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΈΡ Π½Π° Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ° ΠΠΠ£ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ. ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅, ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Π΅ΡΡ 28 Π½ΠΎΡΠ±ΡΡ 2019 Π³. Π½Π° ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΠΠ£ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π. Π. ΠΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²Π°, Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ Π΄Π²ΡΠΌ Π΄Π°ΡΠ°ΠΌ β 215-Π»Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠ±ΠΈΠ»Π΅Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΈ ΠΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΈ 115-Π»Π΅ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΎ Π΄Π½Ρ ΡΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π. Π. Π¦Π°Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π°. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΈΠΈ: Β«ΠΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ β ΠΊΠ»ΡΡ ΠΊ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΒ». Π Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ Π΄ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΆΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ, ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ Π² ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π° Π² ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠ΅. ΠΠΎΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄ΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΆΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΈ, Π½Π΅ΡΠ°Π·ΡΡΠ²Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡ. ΠΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ Π. Π. Π¦Π°Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π° ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»Ρ, ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅ΠΌ. Π ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ΅ Π΄ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π°, ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Β«Π¨ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΉ Π¦Π°Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π°Β», Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ»Ρ Π² ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° XXI Π²
The Principal Conflict in Contemporary Russian Economic Thought: Traditional Approaches Against Economics
The work deals with the ideological clashes in Russian economic thought after 1991. Based on Schumpeter's distinction between economic analysis and economic thought, the paper focuses on a principal conflict that divides a new generation of Westernminded scholars and traditional Russian political economists. This conflict, on the one hand, is described as an attempt of traditional political economists to keep their positions at the economic departments of the universities. The most vivid manifestation of the resistance to economics is the so-called Tsagolov School at Moscow State University. On the other hand, the conflict might be regarded as the reaction of Russian nationalism to the penetration of ?alien? influences that are rather incompatible with the antiindividualist traditions of Russian social thought. The movement towards the creation of a ?national political economy? based on holism and etatism is seen not only as an expression and a by-product of resistance to methodological individualism in economics, but also as implicitly state-induced ideological efforts in a period of transition to an autocratic regime in Russia
ON MATHEMATICAL MODELS OF THE ALLER EQUATION
The solution to the Goursat problem is written out explicitly for a hyperbolic secondorder loaded equation, proposed as a mathematical model of Aller equation under certain conditions
APPLICATION OF LAPAROSCOPIC LIFTING SYSTEMS IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH CARDIORESPIRATORY RISK
Intra-abdominal hypertension during laparoscopic operations increased the risk of complications from cardiovascular and respiratory systems. An application of laparolifting systems allowed doctors to avoid changes of pneumoperitoneum, although it was associated with technical difficulties in operation performance. The authors used a test in order to determine cardiorespiratory reserve in preoperative period. The reserve was characterized by decrease of stroke volume of the heart against the background of intra-abdominal hypertension. There was noted a reliable increase of complication rate in these patients in case of application of standard laparoscopic operation compared with operation using lifting systems