Impact of using less objective symptoms to define tolerated dose during food challenges: a data-driven approach

Background: Food challenges (FCs) form the basis for assessing efficacy outcomes in interventional studies of food allergy; however, different studies have used a variety of similar but not identical criteria to define a challenge reaction, including subjective (nonobjective) symptoms occurring in a single-organ system as dose limiting. Objective: Our aim was to undertake a secondary analysis of 4 interventional studies to assess the impact of using less objective criteria to determine challenge-stop on reaction thresholds and their reproducibility. Methods: We analyzed individual participant data, including individual participant data meta-analysis, by using 3 different published challenge-stop criteria: (1) PRACTALL consesus criteria; (2) Consortium for Food Allergy Research version 3 (CoFAR v3) with at least 1 moderate- or severe-grade symptom; or (3) CoFAR v3 with at least 2 mild symptoms occurring in different organ systems. Reproducibility of challenge threshold was also assessed in participants undergoing subsequent repeat FCs. Results: Four studies, with detailed challenge data from a total of 592 participants, were included. Applying CoFAR v3 definitions for dose-limiting symptoms resulted in an underestimate of reaction thresholds compared with those in PRACTALL (P < .001) that is equivalent to almost a single dosing increment when using a semi-log dosing regimen. Reproducibility was also reduced when applying CoFAR v3 (P < .001 [n = 223]). Using the least conservative interpretation of CoFAR v3 (≥2 mild symptoms occurring in different systems) resulted in a significant overestimate of 15% when assessing oral immunotherapy efficacy. Applying a data-driven minor modification to CoFAR v3 resulted in a new set of challenge-stop criteria with validity similar to that of PRACTALL but one that is simpler to implement and in which significant gastrointestinal discomfort with observable decreased activity remains a dose-limiting symptom. Conclusion: The use of less objective symptoms to define challenge-stop compromises the reproducibility of the FC as a tool to assess efficacy outcomes in interventional studies, and potentially overestimates the efficacy of the intervention tested

Impulse oscillometry bronchodilator response in preschool children

Background: In preschoolers, performing an acceptable spirometry and measuring bronchodilator response (BDR) is challenging; in this context, impulse oscillometry (IOS) represents a valid alternative. However, more studies on the standardization of BDR for IOS in young children are required. Objective: The objective of the study was to identify optimal thresholds to define a positive BDR test with IOS in preschoolers with suspected asthma. Methods: Children aged 3–6 years with suspected asthma and their lung function investigated with both IOS and spirometry pre- and post-BDR were retrospectively analyzed. The spirometric BDR was defined as positive when the change of FEV1 was ≥12% or ≥200 mL. The oscillometric BDR was defined as positive in case of change of at least −40% in R5, +50% in X5, and −80% in AX. Results: Among 72 patients, 36 (age 5.2 ± 1 years; 64% boys) were selected for the subsequent analysis according to ATS/ERS quality criteria of measurements; specifically, 19 patients did not meet IOS and 36 did not meet spirometry criteria. The spirometric BDR was found positive in seven subjects (19.4%); conversely, a positive oscillometric BDR was identified in four patients (11.1%). No patient presented a positive BDR response with both methods. In IOS, the mean decrease in R5 and AX was 19.9% ± 10% and 44% ± 22.1%, and the mean increase in X5 was 23.3% ± 17.8%, respectively. A decrease in R5 of 25.7% (AUC 0.77, p =.03) and an increase in X5 of 25.7% (AUC 0.75, p =.04) showed the best combination of sensitivity and specificity to detect an increase of FEV1 ≥ 12% and/or ≥200 mL. Conclusion: The IOS represents a valid alternative to spirometry to measure BDR in preschool children and should be the gold standard in this age group. We are considering a decrease of 26% in R5 and an increase of 26% in X5 as diagnostic threshold for BDR

The effect of simvastatin on progression of coronary artery disease. The Multicenter coronary Intervention Study (CIS)

BACKGROUND: In several angiographic trials, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors have shown a beneficial effect on the progression of coronary artery disease. Using 20 mg simvastatin, day-1, a treatment period of up to 4 years was necessary to show a significant reduction in coronary artery disease progression. The question remains however whether higher dosages of simvastatin would be more advantageous in respect to the magnitude of the effect and the required time interval to demonstrate treatment efficacy. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Coronary Intervention Study (CIS), a multicentre randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, the effects of lipid-lowering therapy with simvastatin on progression of coronary artery disease in 254 men with documented coronary artery disease and hypercholesterolaemia were investigated. Following a period of lipid-lowering diet, treatment with 40 mg simvastatin or placebo was maintained for an average of 2.3 years. Two primary angiographic endpoints were chosen: the global change score (visual evaluation according to the method of Blankenhorn) and the per patient mean change of minimum lumen diameter (evaluated by the CAAS I system). The mean simvastatin dose was 34.5 mg day-1. In the placebo group, the serum lipids remained unchanged; in comparison to the placebo group the simvastatin group showed a 35% LDL-cholesterol decrease. Coronary angiography was repeated in 205 patients (81%) and 203 film pairs (80%,) were evaluable by quantitative coronary angiography. In the simvastatin and placebo groups, the mean global change scores were +0.20 and +0.58 respectively, demonstrating a significantly slower progression of coronary artery disease in the treatment group (P = 0.02). The change in minimum lumen diameter assessed by computer-assisted quantitative evaluation with the CAAS I system was -0.02 mm in the simvastatin group and -0.10 mm in the placebo group (P = 0.002). In the simvastatin group, there was a significant correlation between the LDL cholesterol levels achieved therapeutically and the per patient mean loss of minimum lumen diameter (r = 0.29; P = 0.003). During the study period, there was no significant difference in the incidence of serious cardiac events (15 of 129 patients in the simvastatin group and 19 of 125 patients in the placebo group, ns). CONCLUSION: Treatment with 40 mg simvastatin day-1 reduces serum cholesterol and slows the progression of coronary artery disease significantly within a short period of treatment time. In the treatment group, retardation of progression is inversely correlated to the LDL-cholesterol levels achieved

Evaluation of food allergy candidate loci in the Genetics of Food Allergy Study

A recent genome-wide association study suggested novel candidate loci for food allergy. Apart from the established locus at 11q13, these revealed no association with food allergy in the Genetics Of Food Allergy Study

Varying Approaches to Management of IgE-Mediated Food Allergy in Children Around the World.

Food allergy is a chronic disease that affects individuals of all ages and is a significant public health problem globally. This narrative overview examines clinical management strategies for IgE-mediated food allergy in children around the world to understand variations in practice. Information was drawn from clinical practice guidelines, recent research, the websites of professional and governmental bodies with expertise in food allergy, and clinical experts from a broad cross-section of geographical regions. The structure and delivery of clinical services, allergen avoidance and food labeling, and resources to support the management of allergic reactions in the community are discussed in detail. The adoption of emerging food immunotherapies is also explored. Wide variations in clinical management of food allergy were apparent across the different countries. Common themes were continuing issues with access to specialist care and recognition of the need to balance risk reduction with dietary and social restrictions to avoid unnecessary detrimental impacts on the quality of life of food allergy sufferers. Findings highlight the need for standardized presentation of practice and priorities, and may assist clinicians and researchers when engaging with government and funding agencies to address gaps

Food immunotherapy practice: Nation differences across Europe, the FIND project

Background: Food allergen immunotherapy (FA-AIT) practice is known to vary globally. This project aims to identify and characterize European centres performing FA-AIT. Methods: An EAACI task force conducted an online survey to gather relevant information regarding FA-AIT practice and setting-specific resources after reviewing the published literature and congress abstracts throughout Europe. Results: We identified 102 FA-AIT centres in 18 countries; only Spain (n = 39) and France (n = 16) had ≥10 such centres. Overall, most facilities were hospital-based (77.5%), publicly funded (80.4%) and delivered FA-AIT as routine clinical care (80.4%). On average, departments had 3 allergists/paediatric allergists and 2 nurses. Surveyed centres had provided FA-AIT for a median of 9 years [1–24] to a median of 105 [5–2415] patients. The estimated total number of treated patients was 24875, of whom 41.3% received AIT for milk, 34.2% egg, 12.8% peanut and 11.7% other foods. Anaphylaxis to AIT doses requiring over 4–6 h of observation was reported by 70.6% of centres, ICU admissions by 10.8% and eosinophilic esophagitis by 45.1%. Quality of life and sustained unresponsiveness were evaluated in 20.6% and 54.9% of centres, respectively. The main contraindications for food AIT were severe asthma (57%-63%), eosinophilic esophagitis (56%-48%) and age below 5 years (47%-41%). Conclusions: In Europe, FA-AIT is provided mostly in clinical practice. Significant variation is seen in the number of centres per country, facility characteristics and inclusion/exclusion criteria, and in certain aspects of protocols. Potential inequality in access to AIT has been identified as well as the need for education and guidance for treatment standardization. © 2021 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd