Mid-Term Results following Traumatic Knee Joint Dislocation

Purpose: Although treatment strategies of knee joint dislocations have evolved, there is still no consensus on the best method and timing. New therapeutic concepts suggest that early one-stage treatment, including suturing and bracing of the cruciate ligaments in acute knee joint dislocation, are leading to improved functional results. This study aimed to evaluate the midterm functional outcome following traumatic knee joint dislocation and to determine whether the outcome is influenced by the surgical management, patient habitus or concomitant injuries. Methods: In this retrospective single center study, 38 patients with acute Schenck type II to IV knee dislocations were treated over an eight-year period in a level I trauma center. At follow-up, various clinical scores, such as the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score, Lysholm Score, and Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), and individual questions about rehabilitation and activity levels of 38 patients were evaluated. Results: Mean follow-up was 5.5 ± 2.7 years. The mean IKDC Score was 65.6 ± 15.7 points, the average Lysholm Score was 70.5 ± 16.4 points and the median TAS was 4 (0–7), resulting in a loss of activity of 2 (range 0–6) points. There was no significant difference between a one-stage treatment compared to a two-stage approach. Ligament reconstruction of the ACL in a two-stage approach was required in only 33.3%. Further operations (early and late) were performed in 37% of cases. Being overweight was associated with more complications and worse outcomes, and external fixation with arthrofibrosis. Conclusions: Knee dislocation is a severe trauma that often leads to a prolonged loss of function and increased knee pain over years, affecting the patient’s activity. Clinical outcome is influenced significantly by concomitant injuries. Severe cases with initial external fixation are associated with a higher risk of knee stiffness and should be considered during rehabilitation. Obese patients present a challenge due to higher complication rates and lower postoperative knee function. Level of evidence: Retrospective single center study, level III

Patient-Reported Outcomes following Tibial Plateau Fractures: Mid- to Short-Term Implications for Knee Function and Activity Level

Background: Patients with complex proximal tibial plateau fractures (TPFs) tend to overestimate the prognosis of their injury, potentially due to factors such as a limited understanding, optimism, and the influence of the pain intensity. Understanding the reasons behind this misperception is crucial for healthcare providers to effectively communicate with patients and establish realistic expectations for treatment outcomes. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of TPFs, with a particular focus on patient-reported outcome measures concerning functional recovery, pain levels, and overall satisfaction with treatment. The authors aim to provide valuable insights into the realistic expectations and potential limitations that patients may encounter during their recovery journey. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, all surgically treated TPFs between January 2014 and December 2019 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included. Several patient-reported outcome measures were obtained, including the International Knee documentation Committee Score (IKDC), Lyholm score, Tegner score, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Fractures were classified according to Schatzker, and then subgrouped into simple (Schatzker I–III) and complex (Schatzker IV–VI) fractures. Results: A total of 54 patients (mean age 51.1 ± 11.9 years, 59.3% female) with a mean follow-up time of 3.9 years were included. Schatzker II fractures were present in 48% (n = 26) of the cases, with Schatzker III in 6% (n = 3), Schatzker IV fractures in 6% (n = 3), and Schatker VI fractures in 41% (n = 22) of the cases. All outcome scores showed a significant improvement between the first year after surgery and the last follow-up (mean: 3.9 years). Simple fractures showed significantly lower patient-reported outcomes when compared to the preinjury state; however, good to excellent results were observed. Patient-reported outcomes of complex fractures showed no significant changes in the study period with good to excellent results. When it comes to the Lysholm score, there were no significant differences in the outcome between simple and complex fractures. Furthermore, there was a return-to-sports rate of 100%, with high rates of changing sporting activity in 25% (simple fractures) and 45% in complex fractures. Conclusions: The data from this study showed that both simple and complex tibial plateau fractures show favorable outcomes at the midterm follow-up, and that injury severity does not correlate with worse results. While patients may tend to overestimate the recovery speed, this research highlights the importance of long-term follow-up, demonstrating a substantial improvement between one year post-surgery and the final evaluation. Return-to-sports rates were high, with adjustments needed for certain activities. However, patients should recognize the need to shift to lower-impact sports and the lengthy recovery process