Latent atrophy factors related to phenotypical variants of posterior cortical atrophy

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether atrophy relates to phenotypical variants of posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) recently proposed in clinical criteria; dorsal, ventral, dominant-parietal and caudal, we assessed associations between latent atrophy factors and cognition. METHODS: We employed a data-driven Bayesian modelling framework based on latent Dirichlet allocation to identify latent atrophy factors in a multi-center cohort of 119 individuals with PCA (age:64±7, 38% male, MMSE:21±5, 71% amyloid-β-positive, 29% amyloid-β status unknown). The model uses standardized gray matter density images as input (adjusted for age, sex, intracranial volume, field-strength and whole-brain gray matter volume) and provides voxelwise probabilistic maps for a predetermined number of atrophy factors, allowing every individual to express each factor to a degree without a-priori classification. Individual factor expressions were correlated to four PCA-specific cognitive domains (object-perception, space-perception, non-visual/parietal functions and primary visual processing) using general linear models. RESULTS: The model revealed four distinct yet partially overlapping atrophy factors; right-dorsal, right-ventral, left-ventral, and limbic. We found that object-perception and primary visual processing were associated with atrophy that predominantly reflects the right-ventral factor. Furthermore, space-perception was associated with atrophy that predominantly represents the right-dorsal and right-ventral factors. However, individual participant profiles revealed that the vast majority expressed multiple atrophy factors and had mixed clinical profiles with impairments across multiple domains, rather than displaying a discrete clinical-radiological phenotype. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that particular brain-behavior networks are vulnerable in PCA, but most individuals display a constellation of affected brain-regions and symptoms, indicating that classification into four mutually exclusive variants is unlikely to be clinically useful

Differential Response to Soil Salinity in Endangered Key Tree Cactus: Implications for Survival in a Changing Climate

Understanding reasons for biodiversity loss is essential for developing conservation and management strategies and is becoming increasingly urgent with climate change. Growing at elevations <1.4 m in the Florida Keys, USA, the endangered Key tree cactus (Pilosocereus robinii) experienced 84 percent loss of total stems from 1994 to 2007. The most severe losses of 99 and 88 percent stems occurred in the largest populations in the Lower Keys, where nine storms with high wind velocities and storm surges, occurred during this period. In contrast, three populations had substantial stem proliferation. To evaluate possible mortality factors related to changes in climate or forest structure, we examined habitat variables: soil salinity, elevation, canopy cover, and habitat structure near 16 dying or dead and 18 living plants growing in the Lower Keys. Soil salinity and elevation were the preliminary factors that discriminated live and dead plants. Soil salinity was 1.5 times greater, but elevation was 12 cm higher near dead plants than near live plants. However, distribution-wide stem loss was not significantly related to salinity or elevation. Controlled salinity trials indicated that salt tolerance to levels above 40 mM NaCl was related to maternal origin. Salt sensitive plants from the Lower Keys had less stem growth, lower root:shoot ratios, lower potassium: sodium ratios and lower recovery rate, but higher δ 13C than a salt tolerant lineage of unknown origin. Unraveling the genetic structure of salt tolerant and salt sensitive lineages in the Florida Keys will require further genetic tests. Worldwide rare species restricted to fragmented, low-elevation island habitats, with little or no connection to higher ground will face challenges from climate change-related factors. These great conservation challenges will require traditional conservation actions and possibly managed relocation that must be informed by studies such as these