The isotype repertoire of antibodies against novel UH-RA peptides in rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND: Recently, autoantibodies against novel UH-RA peptides (UH-RA.1 and UH-RA.21) were identified as candidate biomarkers for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are seronegative for the current diagnostic markers rheumatoid factor and anticitrullinated protein antibodies. Previously, screening for anti-UH-RA autoantibodies was based on measuring the immunoglobulin (Ig) G response. We aimed to investigate whether measurement of other isotypes could improve the performance of diagnostic testing. In addition, assigning the isotype profile might provide valuable information on effector functions of the antibodies. METHODS: The isotype profile of antibodies against UH-RA.1 and UH-RA.21 was studied. The IgG, IgM, and IgA classes, together with the 4 different IgG subclasses, were determined in 285 patients with RA, 88 rheumatic control subjects, and 90 healthy control subjects. RESULTS: Anti-UH-RA.1 antibodies were primarily of the IgM isotype and twice as prevalent as IgG (IgG3-dominated) and IgA. RA sensitivity when testing for anti-UH-RA.1 IgM was shown to be higher than when testing for the IgG isotype: 18 % versus 9 % sensitivity when RA specificity was set to 90 %. Within antibodies against UH-RA.21, IgG and IgA were more common than IgM. Different anti-UH-RA.21 IgG subclasses were found, with the highest prevalence found for IgG2. Combined testing for IgG and IgA slightly increased RA sensitivity of UH-RA.21-specific antibody testing to 27 % compared with solely testing for IgG (23 %). Notably, a higher number of anti-UH-RA.21 antibody isotypes was related to increased levels of erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Finally, for both antibody responses, the full antibody isotype use was demonstrated in early and seronegative disease. CONCLUSIONS: The isotype distribution of anti-UH-RA.1 and anti-UH-RA.21 antibodies was successfully outlined, and, for antibodies against UH-RA.1, we found that isotype-specific testing might have implications for diagnostic testing. The exact mechanisms by which the different antibody isotypes act still have to be unraveled

A 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study of choline-stabilized orthosilicic acid in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of choline-stabilized orthosilicic acid (ch-OSA) in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 211 patients with knee OA (Kellgren and Lawrence grade II or III) and moderate to moderately severe pain were randomly allocated to ch-OSA or placebo for 12\ua0weeks. The primary outcome was the change in the WOMAC pain subscale from baseline to week 12. Secondary outcomes were changes from baseline to week 12 in WOMAC total, WOMAC stiffness, WOMAC physical function, Subject Global Assessment and levels of cartilage degradation biomarkers C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type II (CTX-II) and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP). Pre-specified subgroup analyses included the effect of gender. Results A total of 166 (120 women, 46 men) patients were included in the analysis (87 and 79 in the ch-OSA and placebo group, respectively). In the total study population, no differences were observed between the two treatment groups for the different outcomes but significant treatment x gender interactions were found. In men taking ch-OSA, a significant improvement in WOMAC total, WOMAC stiffness and WOMAC physical function as well as a lower increase in biomarker levels of cartilage degradation was observed, but not in women. The change in WOMAC pain showed a similar positive trend in men taking ch-OSA. Conclusion After 12\ua0weeks of treatment, no effect was found of ch-OSA in the total study population on clinical parameters and biomarkers, but a gender interaction was observed. In men, ch-OSA was found effective in reducing symptoms of knee OA, which was associated with a slight but significant reduction of biomarkers that are related to cartilage degradation. Trial registration The study was registered retrospectively: ISRCTN88583133 . Registration date: 2015-10-07

Inzichten uit implementatieverhalen: analyses van onderwijsvernieuwingen

Symposium. Voorzitter: Geert Kelchtermans, Leuvenstatus: publishe

Antibodies Against Three Novel Peptides in Early Axial Spondyloarthritis Patients From Two Independent Cohorts

Objective This study was undertaken to identify novel autoantibodies in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) and determine their diagnostic potential in patients with early axial SpA and controls from 2 independent cohorts. Methods An axial SpA complementary DNA phage display library was used to screen for novel IgG antibodies in plasma from patients with early axial SpA. The presence of these antibodies against novel peptides (i.e., peptides identified in an early axial SpA cohort from Hasselt University, designated UH-axSpA) was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 76 patients with early axial SpA, 75 controls with nonspecific chronic low back pain, 60 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and 94 healthy controls from the UH cohort. Antibody reactivity to these novel peptides was further validated in 174 patients with axial SpA (of whom 79 had early axial SpA) from the University Hospitals Leuven (Bio)SPAR (Spondyloarthritis [Biologics]) cohort. Results We identified antibodies to 9 novel UH-axSpA peptides, corresponding to randomly formed peptides and to a novel axial SpA autoantigen, double homeobox protein 4. Antibodies to 3 UH-axSpA peptides with the highest positive likelihood ratio (LR) for a diagnosis of axial SpA were present in significantly more patients with early axial SpA from the UH and (Bio)SPAR cohorts (14.2% [22/155]) compared to controls with chronic low back pain (5% [4/75]), resulting in 95% specificity. The positive LR for confirming axial SpA using antibodies to these 3 UH-axSpA peptides was 2.7, which is higher than the LR obtained with the currently used laboratory marker C-reactive protein. Testing for antibodies to these 3 UH-axSpA peptides in patients with chronic low back pain increased the posttest probability of a diagnosis of axial SpA from 79% to 91%. Conclusion Antibodies to 3 UH-axSpA peptides could provide a novel tool in the diagnosis of a subset of axial SpA patients

Antibodies Against Three Novel Peptides in Early Axial Spondyloarthritis Patients From Two Independent Cohorts

Objective This study was undertaken to identify novel autoantibodies in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) and determine their diagnostic potential in patients with early axial SpA and controls from 2 independent cohorts. Methods An axial SpA complementary DNA phage display library was used to screen for novel IgG antibodies in plasma from patients with early axial SpA. The presence of these antibodies against novel peptides (i.e., peptides identified in an early axial SpA cohort from Hasselt University, designated UH-axSpA) was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 76 patients with early axial SpA, 75 controls with nonspecific chronic low back pain, 60 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and 94 healthy controls from the UH cohort. Antibody reactivity to these novel peptides was further validated in 174 patients with axial SpA (of whom 79 had early axial SpA) from the University Hospitals Leuven (Bio)SPAR (Spondyloarthritis [Biologics]) cohort. Results We identified antibodies to 9 novel UH-axSpA peptides, corresponding to randomly formed peptides and to a novel axial SpA autoantigen, double homeobox protein 4. Antibodies to 3 UH-axSpA peptides with the highest positive likelihood ratio (LR) for a diagnosis of axial SpA were present in significantly more patients with early axial SpA from the UH and (Bio)SPAR cohorts (14.2% [22/155]) compared to controls with chronic low back pain (5% [4/75]), resulting in 95% specificity. The positive LR for confirming axial SpA using antibodies to these 3 UH-axSpA peptides was 2.7, which is higher than the LR obtained with the currently used laboratory marker C-reactive protein. Testing for antibodies to these 3 UH-axSpA peptides in patients with chronic low back pain increased the posttest probability of a diagnosis of axial SpA from 79% to 91%. Conclusion Antibodies to 3 UH-axSpA peptides could provide a novel tool in the diagnosis of a subset of axial SpA patients