Kappa statistics for the agreement between original and frozen HS-CTnT samples in flagging high-risk individuals using different cut-off points, for 199 participants drawn from the Health Survey for England, United Kingdom, in year 2016.

<p>Kappa statistics for the agreement between original and frozen HS-CTnT samples in flagging high-risk individuals using different cut-off points, for 199 participants drawn from the Health Survey for England, United Kingdom, in year 2016.</p

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T measurements for 199 individuals drawn from the Health Survey for England 2016.

<p>High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T measurements for 199 individuals drawn from the Health Survey for England 2016.</p

Cronbach's Alpha (Scale Reliability Coefficient) and the Interclass Correlation Coefficient (two-way mixed-effects model for consistency of agreement at individual level) for the test-retest reliability between original and frozen samples for 199 individuals drawn from the Health Survey for England, United Kingdom, in year 2016.

<p>Cronbach's Alpha (Scale Reliability Coefficient) and the Interclass Correlation Coefficient (two-way mixed-effects model for consistency of agreement at individual level) for the test-retest reliability between original and frozen samples for 199 individuals drawn from the Health Survey for England, United Kingdom, in year 2016.</p

Hospital admission numbers and rates per distance travelled, by travel mode, age, and type of incident, Females, England 2007–2009.

a<p>This group may also contain passengers but probably notmany as “unspecified occupant” was rare for collisions.These have been included in the fatality rate estimate.</p>b<p>Estimates are likely to be a little too high due to the assumption that unspecified occupants are all drivers: an unknown proportion would have been passengers.</p>c<p>Note that these averages include both local roads and motorways/multi-lane divided roadways, where fatality rates are an order of magnitude lower than general purpose roads, but data are not available by age and sex.</p>d<p>This figure is greatly exaggerated by under-measurement of under-aged driving.</p>e<p>The base for this was much smaller than distances for other ages, sex, and travel modes.</p>f<p>These figures are too high as V19.8 is a dustbin code, including some off-highway falls.</p>g<p>Not included in the fatality rate.</p>h<p>Estimates are too low, as some ‘unspecified location’ deaths will have been on-highway.</p

Hospital admission numbers and rates per distance travelled, by travel mode, age, and type of incident, Males, England 2007–2009.

a<p>This group may also contain passengers but probably notmany as “unspecified occupant” was rare for collisions.These have been included in the fatality rate estimate.</p>b<p>Estimates are likely to be a little too high due to the assumption that unspecified occupants are all drivers: an unknown proportion would have been passengers.</p>c<p>Note that these averages include both local roads and motorways/multi-lane divided roadways, where fatality rates are an order of magnitude lower than general purpose roads, but data are not available by age and sex.</p>d<p>This figure is greatly exaggerated by under-measurement of under-aged driving.</p>e<p>These figures are too high as V19.8 is a dustbin code, including some off-highway falls.</p>f<p>Not included in the fatality rate.</p>g<p>Estimates are too low, as some ‘unspecified location’ deaths will have been on-highway.</p

Fatality numbers and rates per distance travelled, by travel mode, age, and type of incident, Females, England 2007–2009.

a<p>This group may also contain passengers but probably notmany as “unspecified occupant” was rare for collisions.These have been included in the fatality rate estimate.</p>b<p>Estimates are likely to be a little too high due to the assumption that unspecified occupants are all drivers: an unknown proportion would have been passengers, especially for females.</p>c<p>Note that these averages include both local roads and motorways/multi-lane divided roadways, where fatality rates are an order of magnitude lower than general purpose roads, but data are not available by age and sex.</p>d<p>This figure is greatly exaggerated by under-measurement of under-aged driving.</p>e<p>The base for this was much smaller than distances for other ages, sex, and travel modes.</p>f<p>These figures are too high as V19.8 is a dustbin code, including some off-highway falls.</p>g<p>Not included in the fatality rate.</p>h<p>Estimates are too low, as some ‘unspecified location’ deaths will have been on-highway.</p

Hospital admission rates per million hours travel (mhu^a) by travel mode, age, and sex, England 2007–2009.

a<p>mhu: million hours use, estimated using National Travel Survey average speed for all trips by this mode as not available by age and sex.</p>b<p>These averages include both local roads and motorways/multi-lane divided roadways, where fatality rates are an order of magnitude lower than general purpose roads, but data are not available by age and sex.</p>c<p>This figure is greatly exaggerated by under-measurement of under-aged driving.</p>d<p>These figures are too high as V19.8 is a dustbin code, including some off-highway falls.</p>e<p>Estimates are too low, as some ‘unspecified location’ deaths will have been on-highway.</p

Fatality numbers and rates per distance travelled, by travel mode, age, and type of incident, Males, England 2007–2009.

a<p>This group may also contain passengers but probably notmany as “unspecified occupant” was rare for collisions.These have been included in the fatality rate estimate.</p>b<p>Estimates are likely to be a little too high due to the assumption that unspecified occupants are all drivers: an unknown proportion would have been passengers, especially for females.</p>c<p>Note that these averages include both local roads and motorways/multi-lane divided roadways, where fatality rates are an order of magnitude lower than general purpose roads, but data are not available by age and sex.</p>d<p>This figure is greatly exaggerated by under-measurement of under-aged driving.</p>e<p>These figures are too high as V19.8 is a dustbin code, including some off-highway falls.</p>f<p>Not included in the fatality rate.</p>g<p>Estimates are too low, as some ‘unspecified location’ deaths will have been on-highway.</p

Relationships between PASBAQ and IPAQ assessed time spent sitting on weekdays for men (left panel) and women (right panel).

<p>Solid line represents the fitted linear regression line; dotted line represents the 45 degree line of equality (indicating perfect agreement). Pearson (r) and concordance (P_c) correlation coefficients shown.</p

Derivation of summary variables (PASBAQ and IPAQ) used in HSE 2012.

<p>Derivation of summary variables (PASBAQ and IPAQ) used in HSE 2012.</p