10 research outputs found

    Wilderness_maps_R.1

    No full text
    We present the most up-to-date temporally inter-comparable maps of global terrestrial wilderness areas and the Last of the Wild. These are in .shp format, and were created in ArcGIS

    Corruption Index and Purchasing Power Parity for countries with Single Site Threatened Species (filled markers indicate the ten countries giving greatest returns on investment).

    No full text
    <p>Corruption Index and Purchasing Power Parity for countries with Single Site Threatened Species (filled markers indicate the ten countries giving greatest returns on investment).</p

    The proportion of countries receiving Single Site Threatened Species (SSTS) investments based on five investment strategies, assuming the same average cost of species management.

    No full text
    <p>The proportion of countries receiving Single Site Threatened Species (SSTS) investments based on five investment strategies, assuming the same average cost of species management.</p

    Map of priorities for funding of Single Site Threatened Species (SSTS) based on the balance between the purchasing power parity and the corruption index.

    No full text
    <p>Quintile colours run from dark blue (high returns on investment) through light blue, pink and red to crimson (low returns on investment). Countries in white lacked analysed SSTS.</p

    Observations on breeding Night Parrots (<i>Pezoporus occidentalis</i>) in western Queensland

    No full text
    <p>A population of Night Parrots (<i>Pezoporus occidentalis</i>) was discovered in 2013 in western Queensland and has become the primary focus of efforts aimed at conserving habitat and protecting the species from extinction. Critical information on nesting habitat and location, breeding season and behaviour, clutch size and breeding success is currently limited to anecdotal 19th-century observations and accounts by early natural historians. Here we describe several breeding attempts at Pullen Pullen Reserve. Our observations include nest and fledgling descriptions, habitat and clutch characteristics, breeding seasonality, adult breeding behaviour and vocalisations. We also identify a King Brown Snake (<i>Pseudechis australis</i>) as the predator responsible for one nesting failure. Our observations confirm historical reports of nesting habitat, egg and clutch size and breeding seasonality and provide important new information on vocalisations and adult behaviour around an active nest. These new data provide a basis for future studies and conservation management of this enigmatic threatened species.</p

    Key data inputs and output map from the systematic conservation planning framework.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Protected areas mapped using polygons and buffered points for nationally designated protected areas <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001891#pbio.1001891-UNEP1" target="_blank">[3]</a>. (B) The number of native and extant globally threatened terrestrial and freshwater birds <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001891#pbio.1001891-Birdlife1" target="_blank">[8]</a>, mammals <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001891#pbio.1001891-International1" target="_blank">[10]</a>, and amphibians <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001891#pbio.1001891-International1" target="_blank">[10]</a> per grid square. (C) The average annual agricultural opportunity cost of protecting each 30 km grid square in 2012 $US <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001891#pbio.1001891-Strassburg1" target="_blank">[17]</a>. (D) The distribution of priorities for establishing new protected areas to meet the national-level 17% targets under Aichi target 11 at minimal cost and ignoring ecological representation (red), for covering threatened species (green), and locations selected under both scenarios (yellow). The sizes of the circles in the Venn diagrams are proportional to the area required in each of the three categories.</p

    Efficiency frontier between the cost of establishing additional protected areas to achieve 17% coverage and the number of species covered.

    No full text
    <p>The <i>y</i>-axis presents the proportion of each species adequacy target that is met within protected areas, summed across all species, and is not directly comparable to that of the other figures, which only count species whose protected area coverage meets or exceeds their target.</p
    corecore