20 research outputs found

    Orbital interactions and chemical reactivity of metal particles and metal surfaces

    Get PDF
    A review is presented with 101 refs. on chem. bonding to metal surfaces and small metal particles demonstrating the power of symmetry concepts to predict changes in chem. bonding. Ab-initio calcns. of chemisorption to small particles, as well as semiempirical extended Hueckel calcns. applied to the study of the reactivity of metal slabs are reviewed. On small metal particles, classical notions of electron promotion and hybridization are found to apply. The surroundings of a metal atom (ligands in complexes, other metal atoms at surfaces), affect bonding and reactivity through the prehybridization they induce. A factor specific for large particles and surfaces is the required localization of electrons on the atoms involved in the metal surface bond. At the surface, the bond energy is found to relate to the grou8p orbital local d. of states at the Fermi level. The use of this concept is extensively discussed and illustrated for chemisorption of CO and dissocn. of NO on metal surfaces. A discussion is given of the current decompn. schemes of bond energies and related concepts (exchange (Pauli)-repulsion, polarization, charge transfer). The role of non-orthogonality of fragment orbitals and of kinetic and potential energy for Pauli repulsion and (orbital) polarization is analyzed. Numerous examples are discussed to demonstrate the impact of those concepts on chem. bonding theor

    Comparative analysis of human papillomavirus detection by PCR and non-isotopic in situ hybridisation.

    No full text
    AIMS--To assess the relative diagnostic performance of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and non-isotopic in situ hybridisation (NISH) and to correlate these data with cytopathological assessment. METHODS--Paired analysis of human papillomavirus (HPV) detection was performed by PCR and NISH on exfoliated cervical cells from 122 women attending a routine gynaecological examination. PCR amplification followed by generic and HPV type specific hybridisation was compared with NISH on a parallel cervical smear. RESULTS--Overall, 32 cases were positive by NISH and 61 positive by PCR. Of the 105 cases in which both PCR and NISH were interpretable, 76 (26%) were normal smears, 20 of which were HPV positive by NISH and 37 (49%) by PCR. Of 17 borderline smears, two were NISH positive and 12 PCR positive. Eight of nine smears containing koilocytes were positive by NISH and seven by PCR. Of three dyskaryotic smears, none were NISH and two were PCR positive. The concordance of NISH and PCR in these samples was 57%. To assess sampling error, NISH and PCR were performed on an additional 50 cases using aliquots from the same sample. This increased the concordance between assays to 74%. Filter hybridisation of PCR products with the cocktail of probes used in NISH (under low and high stringency conditions) demonstrated that several cases of NISH positivity could be accounted for by cross-hybridisation to HPV types identified by PCR but not present in the NISH probe cocktail. CONCLUSIONS--Sampling error and potential cross-hybridisation of probe and target should be considered in interpretation of these techniques. PCR is more sensitive because it provides for the amplification of target DNA sequences. In addition, the PCR assay utilised in this study detects a wider range of HPV types than are contained in the cocktails used for NISH. However, PCR assays detect viral DNA present both within cells and in cervical fluid whereas NISH permits morphological localisatio
    corecore