93 research outputs found

    Volumetry of [11C]-methionine PET uptake and MRI contrast enhancement in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme

    Get PDF
    We investigated the relationship between three-dimensional volumetric data of the metabolically active tumour volume assessed using [(11)C]-methionine positron emission tomography (MET-PET) and the area of gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) enhancement assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM).MET-PET and contrast-enhanced MRI with Gd-DTPA were performed in 12 uniformly pretreated patients with recurrent GBM. To calculate the volumes in cubic centimetres, a threshold-based volume-of-interest (VOI) analysis of the metabolically active tumour volume (MET uptake indexes of > or = 1.3 and > or = 1.5) and of the area of Gd-DTPA enhancement was performed after coregistration of all images.In all patients, the metabolically active tumour volume as shown using a MET uptake index of > or = 1.3 was larger than the volume of Gd-DTPA enhancement (30.2 + or - 22.4 vs. 13.7 + or - 10.6 cm(3); p = 0.04). Metabolically active tumour volumes as shown using MET uptake indexes of > or =1.3 and > or = 1.5 and the volumes of Gd-DTPA enhancement showed a positive correlation (r = 0.76, p = 0.003, for an index of > or =1.3, and r = 0.74, p = 0.005, for an index of > or =1.5).The present data suggest that in patients with recurrent GBM the metabolically active tumour volume may be substantially underestimated by Gd-DTPA enhancement. The findings support the notion that complementary information derived from MET uptake and Gd-DTPA enhancement may be helpful in developing individualized, patient-tailored therapy strategies in patients with recurrent GBM

    The Class of All Natural Implicative Expansions of Kleene’s Strong Logic Functionally Equivalent to Łukasiewicz’s 3-Valued Logic Ł3

    Get PDF
    25 p.We consider the logics determined by the set of all natural implicative expansions of Kleene’s strong 3-valued matrix (with both only one and two designated values) and select the class of all logics functionally equivalent to Łukasiewicz’s 3-valued logic Ł3. The concept of a “natural implicative matrix” is based upon the notion of a “natural conditional” defined in Tomova (Rep Math Log 47:173–182, 2012).S

    Ecological networks: Pursuing the shortest path, however narrow and crooked

    Get PDF
    International audienceRepresenting data as networks cuts across all sub-disciplines in ecology and evolutionary biology. Besides providing a compact representation of the interconnections between agents, network analysis allows the identification of especially important nodes, according to various metrics that often rely on the calculation of the shortest paths connecting any two nodes. While the interpretation of a shortest paths is straightforward in binary, unweighted networks, whenever weights are reported, the calculation could yield unexpected results. We analyzed 129 studies of ecological networks published in the last decade that use shortest paths, and discovered a methodological inaccuracy related to the edge weights used to calculate shortest paths (and related centrality measures), particularly in interaction networks. Specifically, 49% of the studies do not report sufficient information on the calculation to allow their replication, and 61% of the studies on weighted networks may contain errors in how shortest paths are calculated. Using toy models and empirical ecological data, we show how to transform the data prior to calculation and illustrate the pitfalls that need to be avoided. We conclude by proposing a five-point checklist to foster best-practices in the calculation and reporting of centrality measures in ecology and evolution studies. The last two decades have witnessed an exponential increase in the use of graph analysis in ecological and conservation studies (see refs. 1,2 for recent introductions to network theory in ecology and evolution). Networks (graphs) represent agents as nodes linked by edges representing pairwise relationships. For instance, a food web can be represented as a network of species (nodes) and their feeding relationships (edges) 3. Similarly, the spatial dynamics of a metapopulation can be analyzed by connecting the patches of suitable habitat (nodes) with edges measuring dispersal between patches 4. Data might either simply report the presence/absence of an edge (binary, unweighted networks), or provide a strength for each edge (weighted networks). In turn, these weights can represent a variety of ecologically-relevant quantities, depending on the system being described. For instance, edge weights can quantify interaction frequency (e.g., visitation networks 5), interaction strength (e.g., per-capita effect of one species on the growth rate of another 3), carbon-flow between trophic levels 6 , genetic similarity 7 , niche overlap (e.g., number of shared resources between two species 8), affinity 9 , dispersal probabilities (e.g., the rate at which individuals of a population move between patches 10), cost of dispersal between patches (e.g., resistance 11), etc. Despite such large variety of ecological network representations, a common task is the identification of nodes of high importance, such as keystone species in a food web, patches acting as stepping stones in a dispersal network , or genes with pleiotropic effects. The identification of important nodes is typically accomplished through centrality measures 5,12. Many centrality measures has been proposed, each probing complementary aspects of node-to-node relationships 13. For instance, Closeness centrality 14,15 highlights nodes that are "near" to all othe

    Hydrophone arrays for instantaneous measurement of high-pressure acoustic fields

    No full text
    Electrohydraulic lithotripter acoustic fields are measured with single-element hydrophones even though the acoustic fields are not highly repeatable. The ability to obtain an instantaneous "snapshot" of the sound field would have broad implications for advancing the understanding of how lithotripters fragment stones and damage kidney tissue. To better characterize the acoustic field of lithotripters, linear hydrophone arrays were fabricated by bonding a 9 μm piezopolymer film to a copper-clad polyimide which had an array pattern etched on the copper layer. After bonding, the devices were backed with an epoxy plug in order to provide structural support. The array elements were each 0.5 by 0.5 mm, spaced 1.25 mm center to center, and there were 20 elements. The relative sensitivity of each hydrophone element was measured at 5.25 MHz for an acoustic pressure of 4.5 kPa and the elements were found to vary by ≈ 6%. The arrays were then placed in the focus of a piezoelectric lithotripter and were found to maintain their sensitivity for roughly 500 shock waves before gradually losing sensitivity. © 2010 American Institute of Physics

    Linear hydrophone arrays for measurement of shock wave lithotripter acoustic fields

    No full text
    Lithotripter acoustic field characterization is based on single-element hydrophone measurements even though many clinical lithotripters do not have highly repeatable sound fields. Here, linear hydrophone arrays composed of 20 elements, each measuring 0.5 by 0.5 mm and spaced 1.25 mm center to center, are described and characterized. The arrays were fabricated by bonding a 9 μm piezopolymer film to a flex circuit on which an array pattern had been formed using standard printed circuit board etching techniques. After bonding, the devices were backed with an epoxy plug in order to provide structural support. The sensitivity of each hydrophone element was measured at 41 mm axial distance with a pressure of 4.5 kPa using a 5.25 MHz, 14-cycle tone burst. The resulting sensitivities were normalized across each array. The normalized RMS voltages were quite uniform across each array, and between arrays, with an ≈ 6% variation in voltage. The arrays were also placed in a piezoelectric lithotripter in order to determine the shot-to-shot repeatability for peak positive pressures of 60 MPa. The array elements withstood about 500 shock waves before slowly losing sensitivity. ©2009 IEEE

    Advisory systems for legal questions

    No full text
    corecore