24 research outputs found

    Accelerating global left-ventricular function assessment in mice using reduced slice acquisition and three-dimensional guide-point modelling

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To investigate the utility of three-dimensional guide-point modeling (GPM) to reduce the time required for CMR evaluation of global cardiac function in mice, by reducing the number of image slices required for accurate quantification of left-ventricular (LV) mass and volumes.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Five female C57Bl/6 mice 8 weeks post myocardial infarction induced by permanent occlusion of the left coronary artery, and six male control (un-operated) C57Bl/6 mice, were subject to CMR examination under isoflurane anaesthesia. Contiguous short axis (SAX) slices (1 mm thick 7-9 slices) were obtained together with two long axis (LAX) slices in two chamber and four chamber orientations. Using a mathematical model of the heart to interpolate information between the available slices, GPM LV mass and volumes were determined using full slice (all SAX and two LAX), six slice (four SAX and two LAX) and four slice (two SAX and two LAX) analysis protocols. All results were compared with standard manual volumetric analysis using all SAX slices.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Infarct size was 39.1 ± 5.1% of LV myocardium. No significant differences were found in left ventricular mass and volumes between the standard and GPM full and six slice protocols in infarcted mice (113 ± 10, 116 ± 11, and 117 ± 11 mg respectively for mass), or between the standard and GPM full, six and four slice protocols in control mice, (105 ± 14, 106 ± 10, 104 ± 12, and 105 ± 7 mg respectively for mass). Significant differences were found in LV mass (135 ± 18 mg) and EF using the GPM four slice protocol in infarcted mice (p < 0.05).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>GPM enables accurate analysis of LV function in mice with relatively large infarcts using a reduced six slice acquisition protocol, and in mice with normal/symmetrical left-ventricular topology using a four slice protocol.</p

    Teacher students’ epistemic beliefs about general pedagogical knowledge: Topic-, source- and context specificity

    Full text link
    Pädagogisches Wissen gilt als wichtiger Bestandteil der professionellen Kompetenz von (angehenden) Lehrkräften. Epistemologische Überzeugungen (Überzeugungen bzgl. der Natur und Genese wissenschaftlichen Wissens) werden ebenfalls als Bestandteil professioneller Kompetenz verstanden. Motiviert durch aktuelle Entwicklungsfelder der pädagogisch-psychologischen Forschung zu allgemeinen epistemologischen Überzeugungen, untersucht der vorliegende Beitrag in einem experimentellen Design, inwiefern epistemologische Überzeugungen Lehr amtsstudierender bezüglich pädagogischen Wissens systematisch über Forschungsgegenstände diverser Subdisziplinen (z. B. Bezugsrahmen-Effekt, Inklusion, Lernen mit Lösungsbeispielen) variieren und welche Effekte verschiedene Quellen des Wissens (Laie, Experte, wiss. Literatur) bzw. die Einbettung des Wissens in schulischen Kontext zeigen. Mehrebenen-(Mehrgruppen-)Strukturgleichungsmodelle, in die 1938 Relativismuseinschätzungen von 323 Lehramts studierenden eingingen, zeigen starke Hinweise auf eine deutliche Varianz der epistemologischen Überzeugungen über die verschiedenen Forschungsgegenstände hinweg sowie für eine geringe relativistische Sichtweise des Wissens von „Experten“. Die Einbettung des Wissens in schulischen Kontext zeigte keine signifikanten Effekte. Konsequenzen für die Erfassung spezifischer epistemologischer Überzeugungen sowie Folgerungen für Lehr-Lernprozesse in der Lehrerbildung werden diskutiert. (DIPF/Orig.)Pedagogical content knowledge is known as an important part of the professional competence of teachers. Epistemic beliefs (beliefs about the nature of knowing and knowledge) are part of some influential models of teachers’ professional competence, too. The current experimental study investigates how epistemic beliefs about pedagogical content knowledge of teacher students vary over different topics (Big-Fish-Little-Pond effect, learning with worked out examples, etc.) and which effects the source (layperson, expert advise, scientific study) and context (school context, other contexts) shows. Multigroup multilevel structural equation models of 1938 epistemic beliefs ratings from 323 student teachers show evidence for a high within-person variance in epistemic beliefs as well as less relativistic beliefs for pedagogical knowledge retrieved from “experts”. School context showed no significant effects. Consequences for further examinations of the specificity of epistemic beliefs are discussed as well as consequences of epistemic beliefs for learning processes in teacher education. (DIPF/Orig.

    Video or text in case-based teacher education?

    No full text
    corecore