SELECTIVE MEASUREMENT OF α SMOOTH MUSCLE ACTIN: WHY β-ACTIN CAN NOT BE USED AS A HOUSEKEEPING GENE WHEN TISSUE FIBROSIS OCCURS

Abstract Background Prevalence of fibroproliferative diseases, including chronic kidney disease is rapidly increasing and has become a major public health problem worldwide. Fibroproliferative diseases are characterized by increased expression of α smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) that belongs to the family of the six conserved actin isoforms showing high degree homology. The aim of the present study was to develop real-time PCRs that clearly discriminate α-SMA and ß-actin from other actin isoforms. Results Real-time PCRs using self-designed mouse, human and rat specific α-SMA or ß-actin primer pairs resulted in the specific amplification of the artificial DNA templates corresponding to mouse, human or rat α-SMA or ß-actin, however ß-actin showed cross-reaction with the housekeeping γ-cyto-actin. We have shown that the use of improperly designed literary primer pairs significantly affects the results of PCRs measuring mRNA expression of α-SMA or ß-actin in the kidney of mice underwent UUO. Conclusion We developed a set of carefully designed primer pairs and PCR conditions to selectively determine the expression of mouse, human or rat α-SMA and ß-actin isoforms. We demonstrated the importance of primer specificity in experiments where the results are normalized to the expression of ß-actin especially when fibrosis and thus increased expression of α-SMA is occur

NPHS2 homozygous p.R229Q variant: potential modifier instead of causal effect in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

BACKGROUND: The pathogenicity of the NPHS2 homozygous p.R229Q variant in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is doubtful. While it has been reported in unaffected controls, it is enriched in patients with SRNS, suggesting pathogenicity. CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT: A family with three members homozygous for the NPHS2 p.R229Q variant is presented: a 37-year-old patient who was diagnosed with proteinuria at age 7 months, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) at age 20 years, and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) at age 33 years, his 59 year-old father and his 40 year-old brother, both unaffected with no proteinuria. The affected son also harbors a heterozygous de novo, truncating PAX2 mutation (c.76dupG, p.V26Gfs*28), which can explain his chronic renal failure but which is rarely associated with FSGS. CONCLUSIONS: This family provides further evidence that homozygous p.R229Q in itself may not cause FSGS. Nevertheless, the rare association of FSGS to a PAX2 mutation may reflect the modifier effect of p.R229Q in the homozygous state. Such a modifier effect can also explain its enrichment in SRNS patients. Patients with homozygous p.R229Q should be screened for the causative mutation in a second gene