Diagnostic imaging capabilities of the Ocelot -Optical Coherence Tomography System, ex-vivo evaluation and clinical relevance

Background Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a high-resolution sub-surface imaging modality using near-infrared light to provide accurate and high contrast intra-vascular images. This enables accurate assessment of diseased arteries before and after intravascular intervention. This study was designed to corroborate diagnostic imaging equivalence between the Ocelot and the Dragonfly OCT systems with regards to the intravascular features that are most important in clinical management of patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease. These intravascular features were then corroborated in vivo during treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) pathology using the Ocelot catheter. Methods In order to compare the diagnostic information obtained by Ocelot (Avinger Inc., Redwood City, CA) and Dragonfly (St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN) OCT systems, we utilized ex-vivo preparations of arterial segments. Ocelot and Dragonfly catheters were inserted into identical cadaveric femoral peripheral arteries for image acquisition and interpretation. Three independent physician interpreters assessed the images to establish accuracy and sensitivity of the diagnostic information. Histologic evaluation of the corresponding arterial segments provided the gold standard for image interpretation. In vivo clinical images were obtained during therapeutic interventions that included crossing of peripheral chronic total occlusions (CTOs) using the Ocelot catheter. Results Strong concordance was demonstrated when matching image characteristics between both OCT systems and histology. The Dragonfly and Ocelot system’s vessel features were interpreted with high sensitivity (91.1–100 %) and specificity (86.7–100 %). Inter-observer concordance was documented with excellent correlation across all vessel features. The clinical benefit that the Ocelot OCT system provided was demonstrated by comparable procedural images acquired at the point of therapy. Conclusions The study demonstrates equivalence of image acquisition and consistent physician interpretation of images acquired by the Ocelot and the Dragonfly OCT systems in-spite of distinct image processing algorithms and catheter configurations. This represents a dramatic shift away from both fluoroscopic imaging and diagnostic-only OCT imaging during peripheral arterial intervention towards therapeutic devices that incorporate real time diagnostic OCT imaging. In the clinical practice, these diagnostic capabilities have translated to best-in-class safety and efficacy for CTO crossing using the Ocelot catheter

Temsirolimus adventitial delivery to improve ANGiographic outcomes below the knee

Background: Current endovascular treatments of below the knee (BTK) popliteal or tibial/peroneal arteries including investigational drug-coated balloons have limited long-term efficacy. Objectives: This Phase 2 trial assessed the feasibility of adventitial deposition of temsirolimus to reduce neointimal hyperplasia and clinically relevant target lesion failure (CR-TLF) 6 months after BTK arterial revascularization. Methods: This prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, comparative, dose-escalation trial enrolled 61 patients with Rutherford 3 to 5 symptoms undergoing endovascular revascularization of ≥1 angiographically significant BTK lesions. Perivascular infusion after completion of arterial revascularization was randomized into control (saline) vs low-dose (0.1 mg/mL) temsirolimus groups for the first 30 patients. In the second part of the trial, patients were randomized to control versus high-dose (0.4 mg/mL) temsirolimus groups. Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were target lesion (TL) transverse-view vessel area loss percentage (TVAL%) and CR-TLF at 6 months, respectively. CR-TLF was defined as a composite of ischemia-driven major amputation of the target limb, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), and clinically relevant TL occlusion. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from major adverse limb events or perioperative death (MALE+POD) at 30 days. Results: There was no discernable difference in effect between temsirolimus doses; therefore, the low- and high-dose cohorts were pooled for the analyses. The principal analysis on the per protocol (PP) group of 53 patients revealed superior primary efficacy of the treatment arm, with reduction in TVAL% of 13.9% absolute (37.3% relative) and the rate of CR-TLF reduced by 27.1% absolute (51.3% relative), at 6 months. Subgroup analysis of all Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) B to D lesions (N=36) revealed TVAL% reduction of 22.3% absolute (48.3% relative) and the rate of CR-TLF reduced by 39.2% absolute (56.6% relative). Freedom from 30-day MALE+POD was 100% in all groups. Conclusions: This hypothesis-generating trial suggests that adventitial infusion of temsirolimus in BTK arteries improves TVAL% and CR-TLF with no adverse safety signals through 6 months, supporting the move to a Phase 3 trial. Clinical impact: There remain gaps in the endovascular treatment of patients with atherosclerotic lesions of below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. The TANGO trial evaluated the use of sub-adventitial temsirolimus with the Bullfrog micro-infusion device during BTK interventions. The therapy was safe and effective. Compared with controls, vessel lumen area patency was improved, and target lesion failure was less frequent. The effects were most appreciable in subjects with higher baseline TASC lesions (B, C, or D). Sub-adventitial temsirolimus offers the potential to improve the results of BTK interventions in this challenging patient population

Improved Outcomes Associated with the use of Shock Protocols: Updates from the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative

BACKGROUND: The National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative is a single-arm, prospective, multicenter study to assess outcomes associated with early mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMICS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Between July 2016 and February 2019, 35 sites participated and enrolled into the study. All centers agreed to treat patients with AMICS using a standard protocol emphasizing invasive hemodynamic monitoring and rapid initiation of MCS. Inclusion and exclusion criteria mimicked those of the SHOCK trial with an additional exclusion criteria of intra-aortic balloon pump counter-pulsation prior to MCS. RESULTS: A total of 171 consecutive patients were enrolled. Patients had an average age of 63 years, 77% were male, and 68% were admitted with AMICS. About 83% of patients were on vasopressors or inotropes, 20% had a witnessed out of hospital cardiac arrest, 29% had in-hospital cardiac arrest, and 10% were under active cardiopulmonary resuscitation during MCS implantation. In accordance with the protocol, 74% of patients had MCS implanted prior to PCI. Right heart catheterization was performed in 92%. About 78% of patients presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction with average door to support times of 85 ± 63 min and door to balloon times of 87 ± 58 min. Survival to discharge was 72%. Creatinine ≥2, lactate \u3e4, cardiac power output (CPO) CONCLUSION: In contemporary practice, use of a shock protocol emphasizing best practices is associated with improved outcomes

Improved Outcomes Associated with the use of Shock Protocols: Updates from the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative.

BACKGROUND: The National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative is a single-arm, prospective, multicenter study to assess outcomes associated with early mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMICS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Between July 2016 and February 2019, 35 sites participated and enrolled into the study. All centers agreed to treat patients with AMICS using a standard protocol emphasizing invasive hemodynamic monitoring and rapid initiation of MCS. Inclusion and exclusion criteria mimicked those of the SHOCK trial with an additional exclusion criteria of intra-aortic balloon pump counter-pulsation prior to MCS. RESULTS: A total of 171 consecutive patients were enrolled. Patients had an average age of 63 years, 77% were male, and 68% were admitted with AMICS. About 83% of patients were on vasopressors or inotropes, 20% had a witnessed out of hospital cardiac arrest, 29% had in-hospital cardiac arrest, and 10% were under active cardiopulmonary resuscitation during MCS implantation. In accordance with the protocol, 74% of patients had MCS implanted prior to PCI. Right heart catheterization was performed in 92%. About 78% of patients presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction with average door to support times of 85 ± 63 min and door to balloon times of 87 ± 58 min. Survival to discharge was 72%. Creatinine ≥2, lactate \u3e4, cardiac power output (CPO) CONCLUSION: In contemporary practice, use of a shock protocol emphasizing best practices is associated with improved outcomes