33 research outputs found
Double dynamical regime of confined water
The Van Hove self correlation function of water confined in a silica pore is
calculated from Molecular Dynamics trajectories upon supercooling. At long time
in the relaxation region we found that the behaviour of the real space
time dependent correlators can be decomposed in a very slow, almost frozen,
dynamics due to the bound water close to the substrate and a faster dynamics of
the free water which resides far from the confining surface. For free water we
confirm the evidences of an approach to a crossover mode coupling transition,
previously found in Q space. In the short time region we found that the two
dynamical regimes are overimposed and cannot be distinguished. This shows that
the interplay between the slower and the faster dynamics emerges in going from
early times to the relaxation region, where a layer analysis of the
dynamical properties can be performed.Comment: 6 pages with 9 figures. RevTeX. Accepted for pulbication in J. Phys.
Cond. Mat
Supercooled confined water and the Mode Coupling crossover temperature
We present a Molecular Dynamics study of the single particle dynamics of
supercooled water confined in a silica pore. Two dynamical regimes are found:
close to the hydrophilic substrate molecules are below the Mode Coupling
crossover temperature, , already at ambient temperature. The water closer
to the center of the pore (free water) approaches upon supercooling as
predicted by Mode Coupling Theories. For free water the crossover temperature
and crossover exponent are extracted from power-law fits to both the
diffusion coefficient and the relaxation time of the late region.Comment: To be published, Phys. Rev. Lett., 4 pages, 3 figures, revTeX, minor
changes in the figures, references added, changes in the tex
VLIYaNIE STATINOV V SRAVNENII S KAL'TsIEM I VITAMINOM D NA POKAZATELI KOSTNOGO METABOLIZMA I MINERAL'NUYu PLOTNOST' KOSTNOY TKANI (MPK) U ZhENShchIN S OSTEOPENIEY V POSTMENOPAUZE
An open clinical trial evaluating effects of Pravastatin (P) 20 mg, Fluvastatin (F) 40 mg versus Calcium-D3 Nycomed Forte (1000 mg calcium and 800 ME cholecalciferol - CaD3 ) on bone metabolism, bone mineral density (BMD) and lipid metabolism have been conducted. We studied 80 osteopenic women from 60 to 80 years old, divided into three groups: 30 participants were treated by CaD3 during 12 months, at the same time 30 ones applied P, and 20 women were treated by L for the 6 months. All of the remedies showed similar influence on the spine BMD (the basal BMD remained intact). CaD3 and L were able to prevent proximal hip from BMD loss whereas patients treated P proceeded to lose bone mass (up to 1.3-1.5%). We have found that CaD3 provides an antiresorptive action (Π‘Π’Ρ
became 27.2% lower and OC -4.1%), that P doesn't touch bone metabolism indices and dual action of L: it suppress a bone resorption (Π‘Π’Ρ
was 14,1% reduce) and show an invigorative action on bone formation (ΠΠ 25,5% raised). The CaD3 treatment was the less expensive, and the highest cost had P course. Our comparative study reveals that CaD3 is preferable in solitary osteoporosis prevention. However when osteopenia or validity OP risk factors coexist with dyslipidemia, type II particularly, use of L may be rational because of it's 6th month therapy had rather equal effect to one of year CaD3 consumption
Khirurgicheskoe lechenie patsientov s bolezn'yu Itsenko-Kushinga
ΠΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½Ρ ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ-ΠΡΡΠΈΠ½Π³Π° ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΈ ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌ Π½Π΅ΠΉΡΠΎΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ½Π½ΡΠΌ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ, ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, Π² Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π², ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π°Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ° Π³ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΠΈΠ·Π°, ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ· Π°Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΏΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΠΊ. ΠΡΠΎ, Π² ΡΠ²ΠΎΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ, ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π²ΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ Π°Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΏΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³ΠΎΡΠΌΠΎΠ½Π° (ΠΠΠ’Π), Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡ Π½Π°Π΄ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° Ρ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π»Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ [5, 8, 11]. ΠΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΎ Π² 1912 Π³. Π°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ Π½Π΅ΠΉΡΠΎΡ
ΠΈΡΡΡΠ³ΠΎΠΌ Π. ΠΡΡΠΈΠ½Π³ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ Π²ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π΅Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΠΎΡ Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π² 1924 Π³. ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΌ Π.Π. ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ. Π Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ Π΄Π²Π° ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π° Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΠΠ: Ρ
ΠΈΡΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ (ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠ½Π°Π·Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ) ΠΈ Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ (ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ, Β«Π³Π°ΠΌΠΌΠ°-Π½ΠΎΠΆΒ» ΠΈ Π΄Ρ.). ΠΠΎ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΡ
Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² [4, 9, 10] ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠΌΠ° Π΄ΡΡΠ³ Ρ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ³Π°Π΅Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΊΠ° 80-90%. ΠΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π΅Ρ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΈΠΌΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. Π’Π°ΠΊ, Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ, ΠΏΡΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ Π°Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΡ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΎΡΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Ρ
ΠΈΡΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π° ΠΏΡΠΈ Π΅Π΅ ΠΎΡΡΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΈ Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΌΡ [2, 3]. Π‘ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΡ
ΠΈΡΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ, Π² ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ» Π² Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠΈΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π°, ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ Π½ΡΠ»Ρ ΡΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π·Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ², Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π΅ΡΠ°Ρ
Π°ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π±Π΅Ρ, ΠΏΠ°Π½Π³ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌ, Π½Π°Π·Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ²ΠΎΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΈ Π΄Ρ