Multiscale Modeling of Superior Cavopulmonary Circulation: Hemi-Fontan and Bidirectional Glenn Are Equivalent

Superior cavopulmonary circulation (SCPC) can be achieved by either the Hemi-Fontan (hF) or Bidirectional Glenn (bG) connection. Debate remains as to which results in best hemodynamic results. Adopting patient-specific multiscale computational modeling, we examined both the local dynamics and global physiology to determine if surgical choice can lead to different hemodynamic outcomes. Six patients (age: 3-6 months) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and catheterization prior to SCPC surgery. For each patient: (1) a finite 3-dimensional (3D) volume model of the preoperative anatomy was constructed to include detailed definition of the distal branch pulmonary arteries, (2) virtual hF and bG operations were performed to create 2 SCPC 3D models, and (3) a specific lumped network representing each patient's entire cardiovascular circulation was developed from clinical data. Using a previously validated multiscale algorithm that couples the 3D models with lumped network, both local flow dynamics, that is, power loss, and global systemic physiology can be quantified. In 2 patients whose preoperative imaging demonstrated significant left pulmonary artery (LPA) stenosis, we performed virtual pulmonary arterioplasty to assess its effect. In one patient, the hF model showed higher power loss (107%) than the bG, while in 3, the power losses were higher in the bG models (18-35%). In the remaining 2 patients, the power loss differences were minor. Despite these variations, for all patients, there were no significant differences between the hF and bG models in hemodynamic or physiological outcomes, including cardiac output, superior vena cava pressure, right-left pulmonary flow distribution, and systemic oxygen delivery. In the 2 patients with LPA stenosis, arterioplasty led to better LPA flow (5-8%) while halving the power loss, but without important improvements in SVC pressure or cardiac output. Despite power loss differences, both hF and bG result in similar SCPC hemodynamics and physiology outcome. This suggests that for SCPC, the pre-existing patient-specific physiology and condition, such as pulmonary vascular resistance, are more deterministic in the hemodynamic performance than the type of surgical palliation. Multiscale modeling can be a decision-assist tool to assess whether an extensive LPA reconstruction is needed at the time of SCPC for LPA stenosis

An interactive simulation tool for patient-specific clinical decision support in single-ventricle physiology

OBJECTIVE: Modeling of single-ventricle circulations has yielded important insights into their unique flow dynamics and physiology. Here we translated a state-of-the-art mathematical model into a patient-specific clinical decision support interactive Web-based simulation tool and show validation for all 3 stages of single-ventricular palliation. METHODS: Via the adoption a validated lumped parameter method, complete cardiovascular-pulmonary circulatory models of all 3 stages of single-ventricle physiology were created within a simulation tool. The closed-loop univentricular heart model includes scaling for growth and respiratory effects, and typical patient-specific parameters are entered through an intuitive user interface. The effects of medical or surgical interventions can be simulated and compared. To validate the simulator, patient parameters were collected from catheterization reports. Four simulator outputs were compared against catheterization findings: pulmonary to systemic flow ratio (Qp:Qs), systemic arterial saturation (SaO2), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAp), and systemic–venous oxygen difference (SaO2–SvO2). RESULTS: Data from 60 reports were used. Compared with the clinical values, the simulator results were not significantly different in mean Qp:Qs, SaO2, or mPAp (P > .09). There was a statistical but clinically insignificant difference in average SaO–SvO2 (average difference 1%, P < .01). Linear regression analyses revealed a good prediction for each variable (Qp:Qs, R2 = 0.79; SaO2, R2 = 0.64; mPAp, R2 = 0.69; SaO2–SvO2, R2 = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: This simulator responds quickly and predicts patient-specific hemodynamics with good clinical accuracy. By predicting postoperative and postintervention hemodynamics in all 3 stages of single-ventricle physiology, the simulator could assist in clinical decision-making, training, and consultation. Continuing model refinement and validation will further its application to the bedside

A novel porous media-based approach to outflow boundary resistances of 1D arterial blood flow models

In this paper we introduce a novel method for prescribing terminal boundary conditions in one-dimensional arterial flow networks. This is carried out by coupling the terminal arterial vessel with a poro-elastic tube, representing the flow resistance offered by microcirculation. The performance of the proposed porous media-based model has been investigated through several different numerical examples. First, we investigate model parameters that have a profound influence on the flow and pressure distributions of the system. The simulation results have been compared against the waveforms generated by three elements (RCR) Windkessel model. The proposed model is also integrated into a realistic arterial tree, and the results obtained have been compared against experimental data at different locations of the network. The accuracy and simplicity of the proposed model demonstrates that it can be an excellent alternative for the existing models

Optimization of Shunt Placement for the Norwood Surgery Using Multi-Domain Modeling

An idealized systemic-to-pulmonary shunt anatomy is parameterized and coupled to a closed loop, lumped parameter network (LPN) in a multidomain model of the Norwood surgical anatomy. The LPN approach is essential for obtaining information on global changes in cardiac output and oxygen delivery resulting from changes in local geometry and physiology. The LPN is fully coupled to a custom 3D finite element solver using a semi-implicit approach to model the heart and downstream circulation. This closed loop multidomain model is then integrated with a fully automated derivative-free optimization algorithm to obtain optimal shunt geometries with variable parameters of shunt diameter, anastomosis location, and angles. Three objective functions: (1) systemic; (2) coronary; and (3) combined systemic and coronary oxygen deliveries are maximized. Results show that a smaller shunt diameter with a distal shunt-brachiocephalic anastomosis is optimal for systemic oxygen delivery, whereas a more proximal anastomosis is optimal for coronary oxygen delivery and a shunt between these two anatomies is optimal for both systemic and coronary oxygen deliveries. Results are used to quantify the origin of blood flow going through the shunt and its relationship with shunt geometry. Results show that coronary artery flow is directly related to shunt position

Numerical blood flow simulation in surgical corrections: what do we need for an accurate analysis?

Background: Computational fluid dynamics has been increasingly used in congenital heart surgery to simulate pathophysiological blood flow, investigate surgical options, or design medical devices. Several commercial and research computational or numerical codes have been developed. They present different approaches to numerically solve the blood flow equations, raising the question whether these numerical codes are equally reliable to achieve accurate simulation results. Accordingly, we sought to examine the influence of numerical code selection in several complex congenital cardiac operations. Material and methods: The main steps of blood flow simulations are detailed (geometrical mesh, boundary conditions, and solver numerical methods) for congenital cardiac operations of increasing complexity. The first case tests different numerical solutions against an analytical, or exact, solution. In the second case, the three-dimensional domain is a patient-specific superior cavopulmonary anastomosis. As an analytical solution does not exist in such a complex geometry, different numerical solutions are compared. Finally, a realistic case of a systemic-to-pulmonary shunt is presented with both geometrically and physiologically challenging conditions. For all, solutions from a commercially available code and an open-source research code are compared. Results: In the first case, as the mesh or solver numerical method is refined, the simulation results for both codes converged to the analytical solution. In the second example, velocity differences between the two codes are greater when the resolution of the mesh were lower and less refined. The third case with realistic anatomy reveals that the pulsatile complex flow is very similar for both codes. Conclusions: The precise setup of the numerical cases has more influence on the results than the choice of numerical codes. The need for detailed construction of the numerical model that requires high computational cost depends on the precision needed to answer the biomedical question at hand and should be assessed for each problem on a combination of clinically relevant patient-specific geometry and physiological conditions