Lumbar Drainage After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE: This study reviews the use of lumbar drains (LDs) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and compares the outcomes to those associated with external ventricular drains (EVDs) and controls. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was performed. English language studies with a sample size of more than 10 patients were included. One-arm and 2-arm meta-analyses were designed to compare external drainage groups. Random-effects models, heterogeneity measures, and risk of bias were calculated. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The 2-arm meta-analysis comparing the LD to no drainage after aSAH found a significant improvement in the postoperative modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (0-2) within 1 month of hospital discharge in the LD group (P = 0.003), a lower mortality rate (P = 0.03), fewer cases of clinical vasospasm (P = 0.007), and a lower incidence of ischemic stroke or delayed ischemic neurological deficits (P = 0.003). When the LD was compared to EVDs, a significant improvement in the postoperative mRS score (0-2) within 1 month of discharge was found in the LD group (P \u3c 0.001). In the LD group, rebleeding occurred in 15 (3.4%) cases and meningitis occurred in 50 (4.7%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with patients without cerebrospinal fluid drainage, patients with the LD after aSAH had lower mortality rates, lower risk of clinical vasospasm, and lower risk of ischemic stroke, and they were more likely to have an mRS score of 0-2 within 1 month of discharge. Compared with patients with EVDs, patients with the LD were more likely to have an mRS score of 0-2 within 1 month of discharge

Exploring the Validity and Reliability of Neurosurgery Residency Program Rankings: A Quantitative Analysis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationships between Doximity rankings (Doximity, Inc.) of residency programs and 2 new ranking systems based on publication rates and academic pursuits. METHODS: We collected data on 550 neurosurgery graduates over 3 years. We analyzed the median number of published manuscripts per resident and the percentage of residents pursuing academic careers and compared them across the Doximity Research Productivity and Reputation Rankings. We used logistic regression to evaluate the relationships among the rankings, publication rates, and academic pursuits. RESULTS: Neurosurgery residents published a median of 10 manuscripts per person (IQR: 6-17), and 50% (IQR: 33%-67%) of residents in a given program pursued an academic career. The distributions of the median number of published manuscripts across the Doximity Research Productivity Ranking and the Doximity Reputation Ranking tiers differed significantly (all P \u3c 0.001). Similarly, the distribution of the percentage of residents pursuing an academic career across both published Doximity ranking systems\u27 tiers differed significantly (all P = 0.02). Moreover, we found moderate agreement between the 2 Doximity rankings, fair agreement between the publication and the other 3 rankings, and slight agreement between the academic pursuit and the Doximity rankings. CONCLUSIONS: We introduced 2 new methods to rank residency programs based on the number of graduates pursuing an academic position and the median number of published manuscripts per resident. By taking a comprehensive approach, neurosurgery applicants can ensure that they select a residency program that meets their needs and offers them the best opportunity for success

Changes in Angioarchitecture After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula.

INTRODUCTION: Dural arteriovenous fistulae (DAVF) are intracranial vascular abnormalities encountered in neurosurgery practice. Treatment options are microsurgical disconnection, endovascular embolization and/or radiosurgery. Past studies have reported the efficacy, safety, and predictors of success of radiosurgery. In this study, we investigated the angioarchitecture of fistulae at the time of radiosurgery and how the anatomy changed in the time after treatment based on angiogram follow-ups. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with angiographic diagnosis of DAVF treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) between 2013 and 2018. Data collection included demographics, symptoms, grading scores, vascular anatomy, radiation data, treatment strategy, angiographic results, and length of patient follow-up. RESULTS: Our study reports data on 10 patients with a total of 14 fistulae. On follow-up angiography, 8 (57%) had complete occlusion of the fistula with a median time to follow up of 19.5 months. The remaining 6 (43%) were deemed as near-complete occlusion of fistula with a median time to follow up of 12.0 months. Time from radiosurgery to angiogram revealing incomplete vs. angiogram revealing complete obliteration was significantly different (p=0.045). Nearly all AVFs had decreased feeders over time after treatment with only one AVF developing an additional feeder post-treatment. Arterial feeders, drainage site, sex, Borden type, lesion volume and treatment volume had no predictive value of obliteration outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides data on the angioarchitecture of fistulae treated with GKRS and also serves as an extension of previous studies reporting the safety and efficacy of GKRS treatment for DAVF in a specific patient population

Academically Inclined: Predictors of Early Career Trajectory and Avenues for Early Intervention Among Neurosurgery Trainees

BACKGROUND: The relationship of academic activities before and during neurosurgery residency with fellowship or career outcomes has not been studied completely. OBJECTIVE: To assess possible predictors of fellowship and career outcomes among neurosurgery residents. METHODS: US neurosurgery graduates (2018-2020) were assessed retrospectively for peer-reviewed citations of preresidency vs intraresidency publications, author order, and article type. Additional parameters included medical school, residency program, degree (MD vs DO; PhD), postgraduate fellowship, and academic employment. RESULTS: Of 547 neurosurgeons, 334 (61.1%) entered fellowships. Fellowship training was significantly associated with medical school rank and first-author publications. Individuals from medical schools ranked 1 to 50 were 1.6 times more likely to become postgraduate fellows than individuals from medical schools ranked 51 to 92 (odds ratio [OR], 1.63 [95% CI 1.04-2.56]; P = .03). Residents with ≥2 first-author publications were almost twice as likely to complete a fellowship as individuals with \u3c2 first-author publications (OR, 1.91 [95% CI 1.21-3.03]; P = .006). Among 522 graduates with employment data available, academic employment obtained by 257 (49.2%) was significantly associated with fellowship training and all publication-specific variables. Fellowship-trained graduates were twice as likely to pursue academic careers (OR, 1.99 [95% CI 1.34-2.96]; P \u3c .001) as were individuals with ≥3 first-author publications ( P \u3c .001), ≥2 laboratory publications ( P = .04), or ≥9 clinical publications ( P \u3c .001). CONCLUSION: Research productivity, medical school rank, and fellowships are independently associated with academic career outcomes of neurosurgeons. Academically inclined residents may benefit from early access to mentorship, sponsorship, and publishing opportunities

Publication Speed Across Neurosurgery Journals: A Bibliometric Analysis

OBJECTIVE: Many factors influence an author\u27s choice for journal submission, including journal impact factor and publication speed. These and other bibliometric data points have not been assessed in journals dedicated to neurosurgery. METHODS: Eight leading neurosurgery journals were analyzed to identify original articles and reviews, collected via randomized, stratified sampling per published issue per year from 2016 to 2020. Bibliometric data on publication speed were gathered for each article. Journal impact factor, article processing fees, and open access availability were determined using Clarivate Journal Citation Reports. Correlation analysis and a linear regression model were used to estimate the effect of impact factor and publication year on publication speed. RESULTS: Across the 8 neurosurgery journals, 1617 published articles were reviewed. The mean (standard deviation) time from submission to acceptance (SA) was 131 (101) days, from acceptance to online publication was 77 (61) days, and from submission to online publication was 207 (123) days. Higher impact factors correlated with longer publication times for all metrics. Later years of publication correlated with longer times from SA and submission to online publication. For each point increase in a journal\u27s impact factor, multivariate regression modeling estimated a 19.2-day increase in time from SA, a 19.7-day increase in time from acceptance to online publication, and a 38.9-day increase in time from submission to online publication (P \u3c 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Publication speeds vary widely among neurosurgery journals and appear to be associated with the journal impact factor. Time to publication increased over the study period

Coiling Versus Microsurgical Clipping in the Treatment of Unruptured Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Open microsurgical clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms has long been the gold standard, yet advancements in endovascular coiling techniques have begun to challenge the status quo