7 research outputs found

    Relative Survival of Three Sizes of Walleyes Stocked into Illinois Lakes

    Get PDF
    The ability to differentially batch-mark several size-groups of fish stocked concurrently in lakes or rivers makes it possible to compare survival within a single year. We evaluated stocking of walleyes Stizostedion vitreum in Illinois during 1991–1996. Ten lakes were stocked with combinations of two or three sizes of walleyes, including fry and small (50-mm) and large (100-mm) fingerlings. This permitted a total of 73 lake-year comparisons: fry versus large fingerlings (23 lake-years), fry versus small fingerlings (29 lake-years), and small versus large fingerlings (21 lake-years). Stocked fish were differentially marked with oxytetracycline or fin clips. Electrofishing catch per effort, relative survival, and population estimates were used in conjunction with production costs to compare size-based contributions and survival. Survival generally favored fingerlings over fry (70% of lake-years for small fingerlings, 67% for large fingerlings) and small fingerlings over large fingerlings (72% of lake-years). In some lake-years, fry and large fingerlings had the highest survival. Fish stocked as fry and small fingerlings were larger than large fingerlings beginning their third year of growth. Based on our results, stocking small fingerlings will generally be more cost-effective than stocking fry or large fingerlings. However, if fry or large fingerlings are available, stocking assessment on specific lakes may allow biologists to determine particular lakes where alternative sizes could be economically feasible

    Evaluation of Watershed Management Practices for Improving Stream Quality in the Illinois Watershed Program

    Get PDF
    ID: 8886; issued July 1, 2000 F-136-RINHS Technical Report prepared for Division of Fisheries, Illinois Department of Natural Resource

    Evaluation of Watershed Management Practices for Improving Stream Quality in the Illinois Watershed Program

    Get PDF
    Annual Progress Report, Federal Aid Project F-136-RReport issued on: July 1999INHS Technical Report prepared for the IDNR Division of Fisherie

    Brook Trout Distribution, Genetics, and Population Characteristics in the Driftless Area of Minnesota

    No full text
    <div><p></p><p>The Driftless Area in southeastern Minnesota is on the southwestern edge of the native range of Brook Trout <i>Salvelinus fontinalis</i>. It was assumed that native Brook Trout were extirpated from this region in the early 1900s due to degraded stream conditions and stockings of eastern-origin Brook Trout and European Brown Trout <i>Salmo trutta</i>. Our objectives were to examine Brook Trout populations in the region to determine their spatial and genetic distribution and quantify population characteristics. Information on presence or absence of Brook Trout was gathered by electrofishing 174 streams in southeastern Minnesota. Brook Trout were present in 68% of coldwater streams compared with only in 3% in the early 1970s. The increase is likely due to increasing stream discharge throughout the Driftless Area, enabling recolonization or successful establishment of stocked populations. Streams with higher base flow discharge also had higher abundance, larger size at maturity, and larger Brook Trout present. Genetic data on 74 populations were analyzed to characterize genetic variation within populations, assess genetic structure among populations, and determine possible origins. Numerous populations were not associated with known hatchery sources but were primarily composed of geographic groupings that could represent remnant lineages. Although population characteristics were similar among genetic origins, potentially remnant populations should be given conservation priority because they have proven their ability to sustain themselves in this region. Management actions that emphasize maintaining or increasing stream base flows throughout the region will likely enhance remnant Brook Trout populations in the Driftless Area.</p><p>Received July 25, 2014; accepted March 17, 2015</p></div
    corecore