4 research outputs found
Admixture mapping implicates 13q33.3 as ancestry-of-origin locus for Alzheimer disease in Hispanic and Latino populations
Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common form of senile dementia, with high incidence late in life in many populations including Caribbean Hispanic (CH) populations. Such admixed populations, descended from more than one ancestral population, can present challenges for genetic studies, including limited sample sizes and unique analytical constraints. Therefore, CH populations and other admixed populations have not been well represented in studies of AD, and much of the genetic variation contributing to AD risk in these populations remains unknown. Here, we conduct genome-wide analysis of AD in multiplex CH families from the Alzheimer Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP). We developed, validated, and applied an implementation of a logistic mixed model for admixture mapping with binary traits that leverages genetic ancestry to identify ancestry-of-origin loci contributing to AD. We identified three loci on chromosome 13q33.3 associated with reduced risk of AD, where associations were driven by Native American (NAM) ancestry. This AD admixture mapping signal spans the FAM155A, ABHD13, TNFSF13B, LIG4, and MYO16 genes and was supported by evidence for association in an independent sample from the Alzheimer's Genetics in Argentina—Alzheimer Argentina consortium (AGA-ALZAR) study with considerable NAM ancestry. We also provide evidence of NAM haplotypes and key variants within 13q33.3 that segregate with AD in the ADSP whole-genome sequencing data. Interestingly, the widely used genome-wide association study approach failed to identify associations in this region. Our findings underscore the potential of leveraging genetic ancestry diversity in recently admixed populations to improve genetic mapping, in this case for AD-relevant loci.Fil: Horimoto, Andrea R.V.R.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Boyken, Lisa A.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Blue, Elizabeth E.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos. Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Grinde, Kelsey E.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos. Macalester College; Estados UnidosFil: Nafikov, Rafael A.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Sohi, Harkirat K.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Nato, Alejandro Q.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos. Marshall University; Estados UnidosFil: Bis, Joshua C.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Brusco, Luis Ignacio. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientÃficas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Morelli, Laura. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientÃficas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones BioquÃmicas de Buenos Aires. Fundación Instituto Leloir. Instituto de Investigaciones BioquÃmicas de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Ramirez, Alfredo Jose. University Of Cologne; Alemania. Universitat Bonn; Alemania. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases; Alemania. University Of Texas Health Science Center At San Antonio (ut Health San Antonio) ; University Of Texas At San Antonio; . Universidad Nacional Arturo Jauretche. Unidad Ejecutora de Estudios en Neurociencias y Sistemas Complejos. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Ministerio de Salud. Hospital Alta Complejidad en Red El Cruce Dr. Néstor Carlos Kirchner Samic. Unidad Ejecutora de Estudios en Neurociencias y Sistemas Complejos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientÃficas y Técnicas. Centro CientÃfico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Unidad Ejecutora de Estudios en Neurociencias y Sistemas Complejos; ArgentinaFil: Dalmasso, Maria Carolina. Universidad Nacional Arturo Jauretche. Unidad Ejecutora de Estudios en Neurociencias y Sistemas Complejos. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Ministerio de Salud. Hospital Alta Complejidad en Red El Cruce Dr. Néstor Carlos Kirchner Samic. Unidad Ejecutora de Estudios en Neurociencias y Sistemas Complejos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientÃficas y Técnicas. Centro CientÃfico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Unidad Ejecutora de Estudios en Neurociencias y Sistemas Complejos; Argentina. University Of Cologne; AlemaniaFil: Temple, Seth. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Satizabal, Claudia. University Of Texas Health Science Center At San Antonio (ut Health San Antonio) ; University Of Texas At San Antonio; . University of Texas at San Antonio; Estados UnidosFil: Browning, Sharon R.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Seshadri, Sudha. University Of Texas Health Science Center At San Antonio (ut Health San Antonio) ; University Of Texas At San Antonio; . University of Texas at San Antonio; Estados UnidosFil: Wijsman, Ellen M.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Thornton, Timothy A.. University of Washington; Estados Unido
Multi-ancestry genome-wide association study accounting for gene-psychosocial factor interactions identifies novel loci for blood pressure traits
Psychological
and social factors are known to influence blood pressure (BP) and risk
of hypertension and associated cardiovascular diseases. To identify
novel BP loci, we carried out genome-wide association meta-analyses of
systolic, diastolic, pulse, and mean arterial BP, taking into account
the interaction effects of genetic variants with three psychosocial
factors: depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and social support.
Analyses were performed using a two-stage design in a sample of up to
128,894 adults from five ancestry groups. In the combined meta-analyses
of stages 1 and 2, we identified 59 loci (p value < 5e−8), including
nine novel BP loci. The novel associations were observed mostly with
pulse pressure, with fewer observed with mean arterial pressure. Five
novel loci were identified in African ancestry, and all but one showed
patterns of interaction with at least one psychosocial factor.
Functional annotation of the novel loci supports a major role for genes
implicated in the immune response (PLCL2), synaptic function and neurotransmission (LIN7A and PFIA2), as well as genes previously implicated in neuropsychiatric or stress-related disorders (FSTL5 and CHODL).
These findings underscore the importance of considering psychological
and social factors in gene discovery for BP, especially in non-European
populations
Polygenic risk scores and kidney traits in the Hispanic/Latino population: The Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos
Summary: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is used to evaluate kidney function and determine the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD), a highly prevalent disease in the US1,2,3 that varies among subgroups of Hispanic/Latino individuals.4,5 The polygenic risk score (PRS) is a popular method that uses large genome-wide association studies (GWASs) to provide a strong estimate of disease risk.7 However, due to the limited availability of summary statistics from GWAS meta-analyses based on Hispanic/Latino populations, PRSs can only be computed using different ancestry GWASs. The performance of eGFR PRSs derived from other GWAS reference populations for Hispanic/Latino population has not been examined. We compared PRS constructions for eGFR prediction in Hispanic/Latino individuals using GWAS-significant variants, clumping and thresholding (C&T),8 and PRS-CS,22 as well as a combination of PRSs calculated with different reference GWAS meta-analyses from European and multi-ethnic studies in Hispanic/Latino individuals from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL). All eGFR PRSs were highly associated with eGFR (p < 1E−20). Additionally, eGFR PRSs were significantly associated with lower risk of prevalent CKD at visit 1 or 2 and incident CKD at visit 2, with the combined PRSs having the best performance. These PRS findings were replicated in an additional dataset of Hispanic/Latino individuals using data from the Women’s Health Initiative SNP Health Association Resource (WHI-SHARe).1
Multi-ancestry genome-wide association study accounting for gene-psychosocial factor interactions identifies novel loci for blood pressure traits
Psychological and social factors are known to influence blood pressure (BP) and risk of hypertension and associated cardiovascular diseases. To identify novel BP loci, we carried out genome-wide association meta-analyses of systolic, diastolic, pulse, and mean arterial BP, taking into account the interaction effects of genetic variants with three psychosocial factors: depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and social support. Analyses were performed using a two-stage design in a sample of up to 128,894 adults from five ancestry groups. In the combined meta-analyses of stages 1 and 2, we identified 59 loci (p value < 5e−8), including nine novel BP loci. The novel associations were observed mostly with pulse pressure, with fewer observed with mean arterial pressure. Five novel loci were identified in African ancestry, and all but one showed patterns of interaction with at least one psychosocial factor. Functional annotation of the novel loci supports a major role for genes implicated in the immune response (PLCL2), synaptic function and neurotransmission (LIN7A and PFIA2), as well as genes previously implicated in neuropsychiatric or stress-related disorders (FSTL5 and CHODL). These findings underscore the importance of considering psychological and social factors in gene discovery for BP, especially in non-European populations