19 research outputs found
A multicenter post-marketing evaluation of the Elixir DESolve((R)) Novolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: First results from the DESolve PMCF study
Objectives To date, experience with bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) that elute agents other than everolimus is limited. Thus, a post-marketing clinical follow-up study was conducted to evaluate the continued safety and effectiveness of the DESolve (R) NOVOLIMUS (TM) Eluting BRS as treatment for patients with stable coronary artery disease. Background Methods The DESolve BRS combines a poly-l-lactide-based backbone with a biodegradable polylactide-based polymer and Novolimus, a macrocyclic lactone mTOR inhibitor. One hundred and two patients (mean age 62 years, 77.5% male) were enrolled at 10 European sites. Comparison of baseline and post-procedural angiographic assessment was performed, and a device-oriented composite endpoint (comprising cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization) and rate of scaffold thrombosis at 12 months were examined. Results Conclusions The device was successfully delivered and deployed in 98.2% (107/109) of the lesions, with two failures to cross the lesion. A total of 100 patients (109 lesions) were treated with a DESolve BRS. Post-procedural angiographic assessment indicated an in-scaffold acute gain of 1.54 +/- 0.44 mm, with a reduction in % diameter stenosis from 61.00 +/- 11.29 to 12.69 +/- 0.44. At 12 months, the device-oriented composite endpoint had occurred in 3.0% (3/100) of patients, with 1.0% (1/100) experiencing scaffold thrombosis and myocardial infarction and 3.0% (3/100) undergoing target lesion revascularization. There were no cardiac deaths. Results through 12 months indicate that the DESolve BRS is a safe and effective treatment for coronary lesions, though larger, long-term prospective studies are needed
High-dose 7-hexanoyltaxol-eluting stent with polymer sleeves for coronary revascularization - One-year results from the SCORE randomized trial
ObjectivesThe Study to COmpare REstenosis Rate between QueST and QuaDDS-QP2 (SCORE) trial was a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial comparing the safety and performance of 13- and 17-mm QuaDDS stents (n = 126) (Quanam Medical Corp., Santa Clara, California/Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts) versus uncoated control stents (n = 140) in focal, de novo coronary lesions.BackgroundThe pioneering drug-delivery QuaDDS stent used four to six acrylate polymer sleeves, each loaded with 800 μg of the paclitaxel derivative 7-hexanoyltaxol.MethodsClinical end points were assessed at 1, 6, and 12 months post procedure. Quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound were performed post procedure and at six-month follow-up.ResultsIn the QuaDDS group, early stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction (MI) rates were significantly higher, leading to premature cessation of enrollment. For the QuaDDS group, the stent thrombosis rate increased from 3.2% to 10.3% between 1 and 12 months, associated with increased non–Q-wave MI and death rates. The angiographic restenosis rate at six months was reduced from 32.7% (control) to 7.4% (p < 0.0001). However, the primary end point was not met with six-month target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate as well as the composite major adverse cardiac event rates (cardiac death, MI, and TVR) comparable between groups.ConclusionsDespite angiographic indications of potential anti-restenotic benefit, increased rates of stent thrombosis, MI, and cardiac death associated with the QuaDDS stent show an unacceptable safety profile