Lesinurad, a novel, oral compound for gout, acts to decrease serum uric acid through inhibition of urate transporters in the kidney.

BackgroundExcess body burden of uric acid promotes gout. Diminished renal clearance of uric acid causes hyperuricemia in most patients with gout, and the renal urate transporter (URAT)1 is important for regulation of serum uric acid (sUA) levels. The URAT1 inhibitors probenecid and benzbromarone are used as gout therapies; however, their use is limited by drug-drug interactions and off-target toxicity, respectively. Here, we define the mechanism of action of lesinurad (Zurampic®; RDEA594), a novel URAT1 inhibitor, recently approved in the USA and Europe for treatment of chronic gout.MethodssUA levels, fractional excretion of uric acid (FEUA), lesinurad plasma levels, and urinary excretion of lesinurad were measured in healthy volunteers treated with lesinurad. In addition, lesinurad, probenecid, and benzbromarone were compared in vitro for effects on urate transporters and the organic anion transporters (OAT)1 and OAT3, changes in mitochondrial membrane potential, and human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) activity.ResultsAfter 6 hours, a single 200-mg dose of lesinurad elevated FEUA 3.6-fold (p < 0.001) and reduced sUA levels by 33 % (p < 0.001). At concentrations achieved in the clinic, lesinurad inhibited activity of URAT1 and OAT4 in vitro, did not inhibit GLUT9, and had no effect on ABCG2. Lesinurad also showed a low risk for mitochondrial toxicity and PPARγ induction compared to benzbromarone. Unlike probenecid, lesinurad did not inhibit OAT1 or OAT3 in the clinical setting.ConclusionThe pharmacodynamic effects and in vitro activity of lesinurad are consistent with inhibition of URAT1 and OAT4, major apical transporters for uric acid. Lesinurad also has a favorable selectivity and safety profile, consistent with an important role in sUA-lowering therapy for patients with gout

Emricasan (IDN-6556) Lowers Portal Pressure in Patients with Compensated Cirrhosis and Severe Portal Hypertension

Caspases play a central role in apoptosis, inflammation and fibrosis. They produce hemodynamically-active, pro-inflammatory microparticles that cause intrahepatic inflammation, vasoconstriction and extrahepatic splanchnic vasodilation. Emricasan is a pan-caspase inhibitor that lowers portal hypertension (PH) and improves survival in murine models of cirrhosis. This exploratory study assessed whether emricasan lowers PH in patients with compensated cirrhosis. This multicenter, open-label study enrolled 23 subjects with compensated cirrhosis and PH (HVPG >5 mmHg). Emricasan 25 mg BID was given for 28 days. HVPG measurements were standardized and performed before and after emricasan. A single expert read all HVPG tracings.Median age was 59 (range 49-80); 70% were male. Cirrhosis etiologies were NASH and HCV. Subjects were Child class A (87%) with median MELD score of 8 (range 6-15). Twelve had severe PH (HVPG?12mmHg). Overall, there was no significant change in HVPG after emricasan (mean [SD] -1.1[4.57] mmHg). HVPG decreased significantly (mean [SD] -3.7[4.05] mmHg; p=0.003) in those with severe PH. 4/12 had a ?20% decrease; 8/12 had a ?10% decrease; and 2/12 HVPG decreased below 12mmHg. There were no significant changes in blood pressure or heart rate. AST/ALT decreased significantly in the entire group and in severe PH. Serum cCK18 and caspase-3/7 decreased significantly. Emricasan was well-tolerated. One subject discontinued for non-serious adverse events.Emricasan administered for 28 days decreased HVPG in patients with compensated cirrhosis and severe PH. An effect upon portal venous inflow is likely and concomitant decreases in AST/ALT suggest an intrahepatic anti-inflammatory effect

Discussing prognosis with older people with musculoskeletal pain: a cross-sectional study in general practice

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Prognosis has been described as an important but neglected branch of clinical science. While patients' views have been sought in the context of life-threatening illness, similar research is lacking for patients presenting with common, non-life-threatening musculoskeletal complaints. The aim of this study was to gauge whether and why older patients with musculoskeletal pain think prognostic information is important, and how often they felt prognosis was discussed in the general practice consultation.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A cross-sectional survey of consecutive patients aged 50 years of over presenting with non-inflammatory musculoskeletal pain to 5 Central Cheshire general practices. The frequency of responses to the prognostic questions were described and the association with sociodemographic, presenting pain complaint, and psychosocial variables explored using logistic regression.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>502 participants (77%) responded to the postal questionnaire. 165 (33%) participants reported discussing prognosis in the consultation with their GP. Discussions about prognosis were more often reported by male patients (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.09, 2.71) and those for whom this was their first consultation (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.16, 2.80). 402 (82%) participants thought that prognostic information was important. This was highest among those currently in paid employment (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.33, 6.57). The reasons patients gave for believing prognostic information was important included 'knowing for the sake of knowing' and planning future activity. Reasons for not believing prognostic information to be important included the belief that progression of pain was inevitable and that nothing could be done to help.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Prognostic information is thought to be important amongst older people with musculoskeletal pain yet discussions occur infrequently in primary care. Barriers to effective prognostic communication and the exact information needs of patients are still unknown and warrant further research.</p

Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Emricasan in Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) Cirrhosis with Severe Portal Hypertension.

BACKGROUND AND AIM Emricasan, an oral pan-caspase inhibitor, decreased portal pressure in experimental cirrhosis and in patients with cirrhosis and portal pressure (assessed by the hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG]) ≥12 mmHg. We aimed to confirm these results in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind study. METHODS Multicenter study including 263 patients with cirrhosis due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and baseline HVPG ≥12 mmHg randomized 1:1:1:1 to emricasan 5 (n=65), 25 (n=65), 50 (n=66) mg or placebo (n=67) orally twice daily for up to 48 weeks. Primary endpoint was change in HVPG (ΔHVPG) at week 24. Secondary endpoints were changes in biomarkers (aminotransferases, caspases, cytokeratins) and development of liver-related outcomes. RESULTS There were no significant differences in ΔHVPG for any emricasan dose vs. placebo (-0.21, -0.45, -0.58 mmHg, respectively) adjusted by baseline HVPG, compensation status, and non-selective beta-blocker use. Compensated subjects (n=201 [76%]) tended to have a greater decrease in HVPG (emricasan all vs. placebo, p=0.06), the decrease being greater in those with higher baseline HVPG (p=0.018), with a significant interaction between baseline HVPG (continuous, p=0.024; dichotomous at 16 mmHg [median], p=0.013) and treatment. Biomarkers decreased significantly with emricasan at week 24 but returned to baseline levels by week 48. New or worsening decompensating events (∼10% over median exposure of 337 days), progression in MELD and Child Pugh scores, and treatment-emergent adverse events were similar among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS Despite reduction in biomarkers indicating target engagement, emricasan was not associated with improvement in HVPG or clinical outcomes in patients with NASH cirrhosis and severe portal hypertension. Compensated subjects with higher baseline HVPG had evidence of a small treatment effect. Emricasan treatment appeared safe and well-tolerated

Lesinurad, a novel, oral compound for gout, acts to decrease serum uric acid through inhibition of urate transporters in the kidney.

BackgroundExcess body burden of uric acid promotes gout. Diminished renal clearance of uric acid causes hyperuricemia in most patients with gout, and the renal urate transporter (URAT)1 is important for regulation of serum uric acid (sUA) levels. The URAT1 inhibitors probenecid and benzbromarone are used as gout therapies; however, their use is limited by drug-drug interactions and off-target toxicity, respectively. Here, we define the mechanism of action of lesinurad (Zurampic®; RDEA594), a novel URAT1 inhibitor, recently approved in the USA and Europe for treatment of chronic gout.MethodssUA levels, fractional excretion of uric acid (FEUA), lesinurad plasma levels, and urinary excretion of lesinurad were measured in healthy volunteers treated with lesinurad. In addition, lesinurad, probenecid, and benzbromarone were compared in vitro for effects on urate transporters and the organic anion transporters (OAT)1 and OAT3, changes in mitochondrial membrane potential, and human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) activity.ResultsAfter 6&nbsp;hours, a single 200-mg dose of lesinurad elevated FEUA 3.6-fold (p &lt; 0.001) and reduced sUA levels by 33&nbsp;% (p &lt; 0.001). At concentrations achieved in the clinic, lesinurad inhibited activity of URAT1 and OAT4 in vitro, did not inhibit GLUT9, and had no effect on ABCG2. Lesinurad also showed a low risk for mitochondrial toxicity and PPARγ induction compared to benzbromarone. Unlike probenecid, lesinurad did not inhibit OAT1 or OAT3 in the clinical setting.ConclusionThe pharmacodynamic effects and in vitro activity of lesinurad are consistent with inhibition of URAT1 and OAT4, major apical transporters for uric acid. Lesinurad also has a favorable selectivity and safety profile, consistent with an important role in sUA-lowering therapy for patients with gout

Emricasan to prevent new decompensation in patients with NASH-related decompensated cirrhosis

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis is a leading cause of end-stage liver disease. Hepatic steatosis and lipotoxicity cause chronic necroinflammation and direct hepatocellular injury resulting in cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Emricasan is a pan-caspase inhibitor that inhibits excessive apoptosis and inflammation; it has also been shown to decrease portal pressure and improve synthetic function in mice with carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrhosis. This double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomized 217 individuals with decompensated NASH cirrhosis 1:1:1 to emricasan (5 mg or 25 mg) or placebo. Patients were stratified by decompensation status and baseline model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na) score. The primary endpoint comprised all-cause mortality, a new decompensation event (new or recurrent variceal hemorrhage, new ascites requiring diuretics, new unprecipitated hepatic encephalopathy ≥grade 2, hepatorenal syndrome, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis), or an increase in MELD-Na score ≥4 points. There was no difference in event rates between either of the emricasan treatment groups and placebo, with hazard ratios of 1.02 (95% CI 0.59-1.77; p = 0.94) and 1.28 (95% CI 0.75-2.21; p = 0.37) for 5 mg and 25 mg of emricasan, respectively. MELD-Na score progression was the most common outcome. There was no significant effect of emricasan treatment on MELD-Na score, international normalized ratio, total serum bilirubin, albumin level or Child-Pugh score. Emricasan was generally safe and well-tolerated. Emricasan was safe but ineffective for the treatment of decompensated NASH cirrhosis. However, this study may guide the design and conduct of future clinical trials in decompensated NASH cirrhosis. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis related to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis are at high risk of additional decompensation events and death. Post hoc analyses in previous pilot studies suggested that emricasan might improve portal hypertension and liver function. In this larger randomized study, emricasan did not decrease the number of decompensation events or improve liver function in patients with a history of decompensated cirrhosis related to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. CLINICALTRIALS. NCT03205345

Emricasan (IDN-6556) Lowers Portal Pressure in Patients With Compensated Cirrhosis and Severe Portal Hypertension.

Caspases play a central role in apoptosis, inflammation, and fibrosis. They produce hemodynamically active, proinflammatory microparticles that cause intrahepatic inflammation, vasoconstriction, and extrahepatic splanchnic vasodilation. Emricasan is a pan-caspase inhibitor that lowers portal hypertension (PH) and improves survival in murine models of cirrhosis. This exploratory study assessed whether emricasan lowers PH in patients with compensated cirrhosis. This multicenter, open-label study enrolled 23 subjects with compensated cirrhosis and PH (hepatic vein pressure gradient [HVPG] >5 mm Hg). Emricasan 25 mg twice daily was given for 28 days. HVPG measurements were standardized and performed before and after emricasan. A single expert read all HVPG tracings. Median age was 59 (range 49-80); 70% were male. Cirrhosis etiologies were nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatitis C virus. Subjects were Child class A (87%) with a median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 8 (range 6-15). Twelve had severe PH (HVPG ≥12 mm Hg). Overall, there was no significant change in HVPG after emricasan (mean [standard deviation, SD] -1.1 [4.57] mm Hg). HVPG decreased significantly (mean [SD] -3.7[4.05] mm Hg; P = 0.003) in those with severe PH: 4/12 had a ≥20% decrease, 8/12 had a ≥10% decrease, and 2/12 HVPG decreased below 12 mm Hg. There were no significant changes in blood pressure or heart rate. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) decreased significantly in the entire group and in those with severe PH. Serum cleaved cytokeratin 18 and caspase-3/7 decreased significantly. Emricasan was well tolerated. One subject discontinued for nonserious adverse events. Conclusion: Emricasan administered for 28 days decreased HVPG in patients with compensated cirrhosis and severe PH; an effect upon portal venous inflow is likely, and concomitant decreases in AST/ALT suggest an intrahepatic anti-inflammatory effect