6 research outputs found

    The effect of bone marrow microenvironment on the functional properties of the therapeutic bone marrow-derived cells in patients with acute myocardial infarction

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Treatment of acute myocardial infarction with stem cell transplantation has achieved beneficial effects in many clinical trials. The bone marrow microenvironment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients has never been studied even though myocardial infarction is known to cause an imbalance in the acid-base status of these patients. The aim of this study was to assess if the blood gas levels in the bone marrow of STEMI patients affect the characteristics of the bone marrow cells (BMCs) and, furthermore, do they influence the change in cardiac function after autologous BMC transplantation. The arterial, venous and bone marrow blood gas concentrations were also compared.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Blood gas analysis of the bone marrow aspirate and peripheral blood was performed for 27 STEMI patients receiving autologous stem cell therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. Cells from the bone marrow aspirate were further cultured and the bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) proliferation rate was determined by MTT assay and the MSC osteogenic differentiation capacity by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity assay. All the patients underwent a 2D-echocardiography at baseline and 4 months after STEMI.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>As expected, the levels of pO<sub>2</sub>, pCO<sub>2</sub>, base excess and HCO<sub>3 </sub>were similar in venous blood and bone marrow. Surprisingly, bone marrow showed significantly lower pH and Na<sup>+ </sup>and elevated K<sup>+ </sup>levels compared to arterial and venous blood. There was a positive correlation between the bone marrow pCO<sub>2 </sub>and HCO<sub>3 </sub>levels and MSC osteogenic differentiation capacity. In contrast, bone marrow pCO<sub>2 </sub>and HCO<sub>3 </sub>levels displayed a negative correlation with the proliferation rate of MSCs. Patients with the HCO<sub>3 </sub>level below the median value exhibited a more marked change in LVEF after BMC treatment than patients with HCO<sub>3 </sub>level above the median (11.13 Âą 8.07% vs. 2.67 Âą 11.89%, P = 0.014).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Low bone marrow pCO<sub>2 </sub>and HCO<sub>3 </sub>levels may represent the optimal environment for BMCs in terms of their efficacy in autologous stem cell therapy in STEMI patients.</p

    Essential Medicines at the National Level : The Global Asthma Network's Essential Asthma Medicines Survey 2014

    Get PDF
    Patients with asthma need uninterrupted supplies of affordable, quality-assured essential medicines. However, access in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is limited. The World Health Organization (WHO) Non-Communicable Disease (NCD) Global Action Plan 2013-2020 sets an 80% target for essential NCD medicines' availability. Poor access is partly due to medicines not being included on the national Essential Medicines Lists (EML) and/or National Reimbursement Lists (NRL) which guide the provision of free/subsidised medicines. We aimed to determine how many countries have essential asthma medicines on their EML and NRL, which essential asthma medicines, and whether surveys might monitor progress. A cross-sectional survey in 2013-2015 of Global Asthma Network principal investigators generated 111/120 (93%) responses41 high-income countries and territories (HICs); 70 LMICs. Patients in HICs with NRL are best served (91% HICs included ICS (inhaled corticosteroids) and salbutamol). Patients in the 24 (34%) LMICs with no NRL and the 14 (30%) LMICs with an NRL, however no ICS are likely to have very poor access to affordable, quality-assured ICS. Many LMICs do not have essential asthma medicines on their EML or NRL. Technical guidance and advocacy for policy change is required. Improving access to these medicines will improve the health system's capacity to address NCDs.Peer reviewe

    Adding non-randomised studies to a Cochrane review brings complementary information for healthcare stakeholders: an augmented systematic review and meta-analysis

    Full text link
    corecore