Ecología alimentaria del Picaflor Cometa <i>Sappho sparganura</i> en la provincia de Córdoba, Argentina

Se estudió la alimentación invernal y estival del Picaflor Cometa (<i>Sappho sparganura</i>) en tres localidades de las sierras de Córdoba. Este es el único picaflor que permanece en invierno en la provincia y a lo largo del año realiza desplazamientos altitudinales siguiendo la floración de diferentes especies. Aunque utiliza en forma indistinta plantas nativas e introducidas, incluso no especializadas para la ornitofilia, interactúa fuertemente con cinco especies indígenas: todas ellas son ornitófilas y <i>S. sparganura</i> sería un elemento importante para su reproducción. No obstante ello, en dos de los sitios una planta exótica (<i>Chaenomeles lagenaria</i>) fue la que posibilitó la permanencia del picaflor en los inviernos más fríos.Summer and winter foraging of the Red-tailed Comet (<i>Sappho sparganura</i>) was studied in three sites in the Córdoba mountain range. This is the only hummingbird species overwintering in the province. Along the entire year it does altitudinal movements looking for different blooming plants. Although the Red-tailed Comet does not discriminate between native or introduced plants, feeding even on non-ornithophilous ones, it strongly interacts with five indigenous species. All of them are ornithophilous species and the hummingbirdís visits would be important for reproduction of these plants. However, in two of the sites an exotic species (<i>Chaenomeles lagenaria</i>) was the most important resource allowing overwintering of the Red-tailed Comet in colder years

Primeros registros de <i>Cyanocompsa cyanea</i> en la provincia de Buenos Aires y notas sobre su presencia en Entre Ríos

The Ultramarine Grosbeak (<i>Cyanocompsa cyanea</i>) is reported for the first time for Buenos Aires Province. Data on the general distribution of the species in Argentina (particulary Entre Ríos) is given

Asociación de dos especies de picaflores con árboles del género <i>Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae</i>) en la provincia de Buenos Aires

Association two species of hummingbirds with trees of the genus <i>Eucalyptus</i> (Myrtaceae) in the province of Buenos Aires. The importance of <i>Eucalyptus</i> trees, in particular the <i>E. globulus</i>, in the diet of some species of hummingbirds, specially during the winter, has been reported. Field observations carried out in Villa Gesell (on <i>Leucochloris albicollis</i>), Pereyra Iraola and Ezeiza (on <i> Hylocharis chrysura</i> ), indicate that this association is also present in the province of Buenos Aires. Our observations during late autumn lend support to the belief that both hummingbird species are permanent residents in Buenos Aires province. However, this has not been clearly stated in the bibliography. On the contrary, there are opposed opinions regarding whether the <i> H. chrysura</i> is or is not a permanent resident, while available data on <i> L. albicollis</i> are insufficient to shed a definite light on the matter

Non-Asteraceae plants in the diet of the Hooded Siskin (<i> Carduelis magellanica</i> )

Según los antecedentes Carduelis magellanica habita áreas semiabiertas o cultivadas, con árboles esparcidos, y se alimenta básicamente de semillas de Asteráceas. En el presente trabajo se comunica que hay varias plantas (la mayoría exóticas) de otras familias botánicas que son utilizadas por este carduelino en la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Una de el as (Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Oleáceas) está muy difundida como árbol de calle y su prolongada oferta de frutos (de marzo a diciembre) explicaría la presencia frecuente del Cabecitanegra Común en la ciudad de Buenos Aires.Literature reports indicate that Carduelis magellanica inhabits semiopen or cultivated areas with scattered trees, feeding mostiy on Asteraceae seeds. In this paper we provide a list of 10 non-Asteraceae plants consumed by this cardueline finch in the province of Buenos Aires, Argentina. The extended fruit availability (from March to December) of one of them (Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Oleaceae), a widespread exotic street tree, probably explains why the Hooded Siskin is fairly common in Buenos Aires city

Genetic engineering applications in animal breeding

This paper discusses the use of genetic engineering applications in animal breeding, including a description of the methods, their potential and current uses and ethical issues. Genetic engineering is the name of a group of techniques used to identify, replicate, modify and transfer the genetic material of cells, tissues or complete organisms. Important applications of genetic engineering in animal breeding are: 1) Marker-assisted selection (MAS). The objective of this technology is to increase disease resistance, productivity and product quality in economically important animals by adding information of DNA markers to phenotypes and genealogies for selection decisions. 2) Transgenesis, the direct transfer of specific genes/alleles between individuals, species, or even Kingdoms, in order to change their phenotypic expression in the recipients. Compared to the 'traditional' improvement techniques based on phenotypic information only, these gene-by-gene techniques allow theoretically a more complete management of animal genomes for animal breeding. In spite of high expectations and new technical developments, its actual efficiency is not always high, as they require a thorough knowledge of functional genomics, and pose additional technical, economical and ethical problems. The possible role for cloning adult animals in breeding is also discussed

Visitantes florales diurnos del girasol (Helianthus annuus L., Asterales: Asteraceae) en la Argentina

El girasol (Helianthus annuus L.) es un importante cultivo oleaginoso en la Argentina. Durante tres campañas agrícolas, se determinaron la diversidad y la abundancia del elenco de los visitantes florales diurnos de capítulos de girasol, en ocho sitios que cubren gran parte del área cultivada en Argentina. Setenta y seis morfo-especies de visitantes florales, pertenecientes a ocho órdenes, fueron capturados sobre capítulos de este cultivo. El principal orden fue Hymenoptera, con 37 especies o morfoespecies, de las cuales 32 fueron abejas (Apoidea). Las familias de abejas más representadas fueron Apidae (13), Megachilidae (11) y Halictidae (7). La abeja doméstica (Apis mellifera L.) realizó el 93% de las visitas. La composición del elenco de visitantes no mostró un patrón de variación identificable a lo largo del día, ni con respecto a la distancia al borde del cultivo, pero varió entre sitios de muestreo. Se concluye que la abeja doméstica es el principal polinizador del girasol en la Argentina, aunque varias especies nativas de abejas (Melissodes tintinnans (Holmberg), M. rufithorax Brèthes, Melissoptila tandilensis Holmberg, y Megachile spp.) podrían ser consideradas como potenciales polinizadores del cultivo.Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is an important oilseed crop in Argentina. During three agricultural years, the diversity and abundance of diurnal floral visitors of sunflower heads were determined in eight sites spanning much of this crop’s cultivation area in Argentina. Seventysix morpho-species of floral visitors, belonging to eight orders, were captured on sunflower. The principal order was Hymenoptera, with 37 species or morpho-species, of which 32 were bees (Apoidea). The most represented bee families were Apidae (13), Megachilidae (11) and Halictidae (7). The domestic bee (Apis mellifera L.) accounted for 93% of the visits. Floral visitor composition did not show an identifiable variation pattern either throughout the day or with respect to the distance to the edge of the crop, but varied among sites. It is concluded that the domestic bee is the main sunflower pollinator in Argentina, although several native bee species (Melissodes tintinnans (Holmberg), M. rufithorax Brèthes, Melissoptila tandilensis Holmberg, and Megachile spp.) could be considered as potential crop pollinators.Fil: Torretta, Juan Pablo. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente. Cátedra de Botánica Agrícola; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Medan, Diego. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente. Cátedra de Botánica Agrícola; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Roig Alsina, Arturo Hernan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia"; ArgentinaFil: Montaldo, Norberto H.. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente. Cátedra de Botánica Agrícola; Argentin

Use of molecular markers and major genes in the genetic improvement of livestock

Recent developments in molecular biology and statistics have opened the possibility of identifying and using genomic variation and major genes for the genetic improvement of livestock. Information concerning the basis of these techniques and their applications to the genetic improvement of animals is reviewed. Main marker molecular marker systems in animals (RFPL and microsatellites), genome maps, methods for detecting marker major gene linkages and use of marker assisted selection, genetic fingerprinting and mixture models based on segregation analysis are analyzed. The characteristics where the application of marker assisted selection can be more effective are those that are expressed late in the life of the animal, or controlled by a few pairs of genes. The first example correspond to the longevity and carcass characteristics in meat producing animals, the second, to the resistance to certain diseases or defects of simple inheritance. The detection of major genes using mixture models with segregation analysis can direct the work of identification of DNA marker genotypes towards populations and characteristics with greater probability of detecting a major gene using molecular markers. The present trend indicates that molecular, pedigree and phenotypic information will be integrated in the future through mixture models of segregation analysis that might contain major gene effects through the markers, polygenic inheritance and uses powerful and flexible methods of estimation such as Gibbs Sampling

Gli effetti dell’introduzione della nuova mappa di pericolosità sulla valutazione del rischio sismico in Italia.

L’introduzione di una versione aggiornata della mappa di pericolosità sismica, definita per diversi periodi di ritorno e per svariati valori di ordinate spettrali, porta inevitabilmente a dei cambiamenti sul livello di rischio sismico del costruito italiano. Poiché la relazione tra domanda e capacità non è lineare per tutto il range di periodi di vibrazione strutturale, è necessario valutare il cambiamento del livello di rischio sismico calcolando esplicitamente la vulnerabilità sismica di strutture esistenti con diversi periodi di vibrazione, per diversi stati limite e considerando sia la nuova che la precedente definizione di pericolosità. Nel presente lavoro è stato eseguito un primo studio degli effetti che l’introduzione di mappe aggiornate della pericolosità sismica potrebbe avere sulla valutazione dei livelli di rischio sismico nel territorio italiano. Le caratteristiche generali del costruito sono state ricavate dai dati del 14° Censimento Generale della Popolazione e delle Abitazioni (ISTAT 2001), mentre una procedura probabilistica di valutazione sismica per edifici esistenti a scala urbana è stata impiegata per stimare la capacità. Sono stati considerati tutti i tre stati limite prescritti dall’Ordinanza (danno lieve, danno severo, collasso) in corrispondenza dei rispettivi valori di domanda, così come il cambiamento delle forme spettrali in funzione della localizzazione e del periodo di ritorno. I risultati dimostrano che la nuova mappa di pericolosità sismica porta a dei livelli di rischio sismico più realistici e meno allarmanti, rendendo leggermente meno gravoso, anche se non privo di problematiche, il panorama attuale di rischio in Italia

Opportunities and challenges from the use of genomic selection for beef cattle breeding in Latin America

In 2009, Latin American countries had approximately 401 million cattle (29% of the world’s total cattle population) and produced 8.2 million tonnes of beef, equivalent to 29% of the world’s total production (FAO, 2011). Beef in Latin American countries is produced under widely differing climates (ranging from tropical to temperate), resources available (vegetation, food), types of markets, and genetic backgrounds of the animals. The main production systems are classified as beef and dual-purpose cattle. The genetic backgrounds of animals vary from purebred European (Bos taurus taurus) or Zebu (Bos taurus indicus) to crossbreeds (Figures 1 and 2). Beef production systems may also be characterized by their management intensification levels as grazing only, grazing with food supplementation, and feedlot production. The main beef-producing countries are Brazil (51.6% of the total Latin American beef production), Argentina (18.5%), Mexico (9.4%), and Colombia (5.1%). Other countries contributing more than 1% of the total regional production are Uruguay, Venezuela, Paraguay, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Chile (Table 1). Latin America is a region of the world that can significantly increase its production in response to beef demand. Brazil has a mature beef cattle industry based on grass-fed cattle, in which feeding B. taurus indicus cattle, especially the Nellore breed, is a common practice. Over the last 8 years, beef production in Brazil has become one of the most important activities for employment and wealth creation. Foot-and-mouth disease issues are still a factor limiting the increase in Latin American beef exports (Ferraz and de Felício, 2010; Domingues Millen et al., 2011). Only a few Latin American countries, including Chile and Mexico, have the status of being free of this disease without vaccination. In most countries, the disease is controlled using a combination of free areas without vaccination and areas with vaccination. Other countries with a strong B. taurus indicus background in their beef cattle populations are those with large tropical areas dedicated to beef cattle production, such as Colombia, Venezuela, and Paraguay. Beef production in Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, and some portions of Brazil and Mexico is based mainly around the production of B. taurus taurus cattle (Peel et al., 2010; Arelovich et al., 2011; Domingues Millen et al., 2011). The Mexican beef cattle industry consists of 2 nearly separate market components. Beef producers in the northern part of Mexico have largely focused on the production of calves for export to the United States (Galyean et al., 2011). European beef genetics have been widely used in the region, beginning with importations of Hereford cattle and continuing with today’s popularity of Angus and Brangus along with several continental breeds, such as Charolais and Simmental. The central and southern regions of Mexico have historically produced grass-fed beef for the national market as well as dual-purpose dairy-Zebu crossbred cattle to produce milk and beef (Peel et al., 2010). Currently, breeding programs for the genetic evaluation of beef cattle in Latin America are based on statistical analyses in which performance and pedigree information are integrated. These analyses are based on a mixed model methodology, in particular the animal model statistical approach using best linear unbiased prediction methods to obtain estimated breeding values (EBV) for economically important traits. This methodology for obtaining EBV has been set up in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Uruguay, Venezuela, and other countries. It has been established for specific purebred populations and also for some crossbred populations, such as multibreed populations with a dual purpose (beef and milk) in the Latin American humid tropics, which involve animals crossbred between B. taurus taurus and B. taurus indicus and composite breeds. Most programs focus on evaluating growth and reproductive traits, although a few have included longevity (stayability), heifer pregnancy, conformation, and carcass and meat quality traits