100 research outputs found
The CDIO Syllabus 3.0 - An Updated Statement of Goals
The CDIO Initiative is going through a process of reconsidering and updating the CDIO approach for engineering education development. Previous work resulted in substantial updates of the twelve CDIO standards and the introduction of âoptionalâ CDIO standards. This paper reports on a similar review and update of the CDIO Syllabus to version 3.0. It has been developed by a working group consisting of four sub-groups and iterated and refined guided by feedback from the whole CDIO community. There are mainly three external drivers that motivate the changes: sustainability, digitalization, and acceleration. There is also an internal driver in the form of lessons learned within the CDIO community, from using the Syllabus in curriculum and course development. Approximately 70 updates are proposed, amongst them three additions on the X.X level, namely 1.4 Knowledge of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3.1 Teamwork and Collaboration, and 5.3 Research
The CDIO Syllabus 3.0 - An Updated Statement of Goals
The CDIO Initiative is going through a process of reconsidering and updating the CDIO approach for engineering education development. Previous work resulted in substantial updates of the twelve CDIO standards and the introduction of âoptionalâ CDIO standards. This paper reports on a similar review and update of the CDIO Syllabus to version 3.0. It has been developed by a working group consisting of four sub-groups and iterated and refined guided by feedback from the whole CDIO community. There are mainly three external drivers that motivate the changes: sustainability, digitalization, and acceleration. There is also an internal driver in the form of lessons learned within the CDIO community, from using the Syllabus in curriculum and course development. Approximately 70 updates are proposed, amongst them three additions on the X.X level, namely 1.4 Knowledge of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3.1 Teamwork and Collaboration, and 5.3 Research
Toward CDIO Standards 3.0
The topic of this paper is the CDIO Standards, specifically the formulation of CDIO Standards version 3.0. The paper first reviews the potential change drivers that motivate a revision of the Standards. Such change drivers are identified both externally (i.e., from outside of the CDIO community) and internally. It is found that external change drivers have affected the perceptions of what problems engineers should address, what knowledge future engineers should possess and what are the most effective teaching practices in engineering education. Internally, the paper identifies criticism of the Standards, as well as ideas for development, that have been codified as proposed additional CDIO Standards. With references to these change drivers, five areas are identified for the revision: sustainability, digitalization of teaching and learning; service; and faculty competence. A revised version of the Standards is presented. In addition, it is proposed that a new category of Standards is established, âoptional standardsâ. Optional Standards are a complement to the twelve âbasicâ Standards, and serve to guide educational development and profiling beyond the current Standards. A selected set of proposed optional Standards are recommended for further evaluation and possibly acceptance by the CDIO community
A genetic variation map for chicken with 2.8 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms
We describe a genetic variation map for the chicken genome containing 2.8 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms ( SNPs). This map is based on a comparison of the sequences of three domestic chicken breeds ( a broiler, a layer and a Chinese silkie) with that of their wild ancestor, red jungle fowl. Subsequent experiments indicate that at least 90% of the variant sites are true SNPs, and at least 70% are common SNPs that segregate in many domestic breeds. Mean nucleotide diversity is about five SNPs per kilobase for almost every possible comparison between red jungle fowl and domestic lines, between two different domestic lines, and within domestic lines - in contrast to the notion that domestic animals are highly inbred relative to their wild ancestors. In fact, most of the SNPs originated before domestication, and there is little evidence of selective sweeps for adaptive alleles on length scales greater than 100 kilobases
Genetic Studies of Pigmentation in Chicken
Domestic animals have been selected by humans for thousands of years, which have drastically altered their genetic constitution and phenotypes. In this thesis, several of the most important genes causing pigmentation differences between the wild red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and domestic chickens have been identified. Pigmentation phenotypes are easily scored, and the genes underlying these phenotypes are valuable models to study gene function and gene interaction. Dominant white colour is widespread among domestic chickens. The Dominant white allele specifically inhibits the expression of black (eumelanin) pigment and we identified several insertion/deletion mutations in the PMEL17 gene causing the different phenotypes controlled by this locus. The Silver allele on the other hand inhibits the expression of red (pheomelanin) colour and is a genetic variant of the SLC45A2 gene. Silver is the first pheomelanin-specific mutation(s) reported for this gene. An 8 kb deletion, including a conserved enhancer element, 14 kb upstream of the transcription factor SOX10 is causing the Dark brown phenotype. This phenotype restricts the expression of eumelanin and enhances red pheomelanin in specific parts of the plumage. These three gene identifications have extended the knowledge about genes affecting melanocyte function. Carotenoid-based pigmentation is of utmost importance in birds and other animals. The yellow skin allele in chicken allows deposition of carotenoids in skin and explains why most domestic chickens have yellow legs. We demonstrated that the yellow skin phenotype is caused by a tissue specific regulatory mutation in the gene for the enzyme beta-caroten dioxygenase 2 (BCDO2). This was the first identification of a specific gene underlying carotenoid-based pigmentation. Interestingly, the yellow skin haplotype was shown to originate from the grey junglefowl (Gallus sonneratii) and not the red junglefowl as expected, thus presenting the first conclusive evidence for a hybrid origin of the domestic chicken.
In the Streets of Zanzibar : Constructions of Gender and Place
This thesis studies the access and use of public spaces from a gender perspective, with Zanzibar Stone Town as a case study. The thesis brings together and discusses several theories that might explain the access and use of public spaces from a gender perspective; planning theory, theories about public space, theories about how places are gendered and Islam since the case study is carried out in a Muslim area. Moreover, the thesis takes a starting point in a feminist scholarship. The discussion shows that places and gender are constructed over and over again. Today, women are sub-ordinated men and have less access to public space, but this is a constructed fact. Since culture is not static, subordination of women can be changed into equality between women and men. However, the task is not simple and one might wonder whether spatial planners can do anything at all. This thesis argues that planners can put their piece to the jigsaw. They can facilitate a planning process that takes power relations into consideration and they can question the social and cultural constructions of gender and place.QC 2011051
Just Sustainable Futures : Gender and Environmental Justice Considerations in Planning
This thesis contributes and deepens knowledge on long-term planning for sustainÂable development through exploring environÂmental justice and gender discourses in planning and futures studies. It also suggests ways of working with those issues. Environmental justice is explored through discussions with planners in Stockholm, Sweden, and through looking at images of future Stockholm and the environmental justice implications of these. These studies show how environÂmental justice issues can be manifested in a Swedish urban context and discuss how sustainable development and environmental justice can be inÂcreased, operationalised and politicised in planning. One key contriÂbution of the thesis is in identifying the need to address proceÂdural and outcomes values in both planning and futures studies. Gender discourses are explored through analysing papers published in the journal Futures and through an examination of Swedish Regional Growth Programmes. The feminist criticism of futures studies mainly relates to the field being male-dominated and male-biased, which means that the future is seen as already colonised by men, that futures studies generally do not work with feminist issues or issues of particular relevance for women, and that they often lack a critical and reflexive perspective. There is therefore a call for feminist futures as a contrast to hegemonic male and Western technology-orientated futures. The case of the Swedish Regional Growth Programmes shows that gender inequality is often viewed as a problem of unequal rights and possibilities. This liberal view on gender equality has made it rather easy for gender equality advocates to voice demands, e.g. for the inclusion of both women and men in decision-making processes, but the traditional male norm is not challenged. If a different response is required, other ways of describing the problem of gender inequalities must be facilitated. One way to open up different ways of describing the problem and to describe desirable futures could be the use of scenarios. Planning for just, sustainable futures means acknowledging process values, but also content (giving nature a voice!). It also means politicising planning. There are a number of desirable futures, and when this is clarified the political content of planning is revealed. These different images of the future can be evaluated in terms of environmental justice, gender perspective or any specific environmental aspect, e.g. biodiversity, which indicates that different futures are differently good for nature and/or different societal groups.Den hĂ€r avhandlingen bidrar till och fördjupar kunskapen om lĂ„ngsiktig planering för hĂ„llbar utveckling. Den gör det genom att belysa miljörĂ€ttvise- och genusÂdiskurser i planering och framtidsstudier. Den föreslĂ„r ocksĂ„ sĂ€tt att arbeta med dessa frĂ„gor. MiljörĂ€ttvisa belyses genom diskussioner med planerare i Stockholm och Ă€ven genom att undersöka framtidsbilder av Stockholms och deras miljöÂrĂ€ttÂviseÂkonseÂkvenser. De hĂ€r studierna visar bĂ„de hur miljörĂ€ttvisefrĂ„gor kan maniÂfesteras i en svensk urban kontext och diskuterar hur hĂ„llbar utveckling och miljöÂrĂ€ttvisa kan fĂ„ ökad betydelse, operationaliseras och politiseras i planeringen. Ett viktigt bidrag med den hĂ€r avhandlingen Ă€r att pĂ„peka behovet av att adressera bĂ„de processÂuella vĂ€rden och resultat av planering och framÂtidsÂstudier. Genusdiskurser utforskas genom att analysera artiklar som publicerats i tidskriften Futures och genom en undersökning av de svenska regionala tillÂvĂ€xtÂprogrammen. Den feministiska kritiken av framtidsstudier handlar framförÂallt om att fĂ€ltet Ă€r mansdominerat och fokuserar traditionellt manliga frĂ„gor, framÂtiden ses dĂ€rför som redan koloniserad av mĂ€n. Dessutom pĂ„pekas att framÂtidsÂstudier i allmĂ€nhet inte jobbar med feministiska frĂ„gor eller frĂ„gor av sĂ€rÂskild betydelse för kvinnor, att framtidsstudier ofta saknar ett kritiskt och reflexivt perspektiv och att det finns en efterfrĂ„gan av feministiska framtider som en kontrast till hegemoniskt manliga, vĂ€sterlĂ€ndskt och teknologiskt inÂriktade framtider. Fallet med de svenska regionala tillvĂ€xtprogrammen visar att ojĂ€mstĂ€lldhet ofta ses som ett problem av ojĂ€mlika rĂ€ttigheter och möjligÂheter. Denna liberala syn pĂ„ jĂ€mstĂ€lldhet har gjort det ganska lĂ€tt för jĂ€mÂstĂ€lldÂhetsÂföresprĂ„kare att krĂ€va och ge röst för krav som att bĂ„de kvinnor och mĂ€n ska inkluderas i beslutsprocesser, men den traditionella manliga normen ifrĂ„gaÂsĂ€tts sĂ€llan. Om andra lösningar önskas, mĂ„ste andra sĂ€tt att beskriva problemet med bristande jĂ€mstĂ€lldhet underlĂ€ttas. Ett sĂ€tt att öppna upp för olika sĂ€tt att beskriva problemet och Ă€ven sĂ€tt att beskriva önskvĂ€rda framtider skulle kunna vara anvĂ€ndning av scenarier. Planering för en rĂ€ttvis hĂ„llbar framtid innebĂ€r ett erkĂ€nnande processuella vĂ€rden, men Ă€ven av sjĂ€lva resultatet (ge naturen en röst!). Det innebĂ€r ocksĂ„ att politisera planeringen. Genom att tydliggöra att det finns flera olika önskÂvĂ€rda framtider kan planeringens politiska innehĂ„ll synliggöras. Dessa olika framÂtidsbilder kan utvĂ€rderas i termer av miljörĂ€ttvisa, deras jĂ€mÂstĂ€lldhetsÂperspektiv eller nĂ„gon specifik miljöaspekt som biologisk mĂ„ngfald. Detta skulle tydliggöra att olika framtider Ă€r olika bra för naturen och/eller olika samÂhĂ€llsÂgrupper.QC 2011052
Gender in futures : A study of gender and feminist papers published in Futures, 1969-2009
This paper reviews and discusses papers related to women's studies, gender or feminist perspectives, published in the scientific journal Futures. The aim is to provide new understandings and remapping of futures studies by capturing how gender is created and understood in this field. The gender/feminist criticism of futures studies mainly relates to the field being male-dominated and male biased, which means that the future is seen as already colonised by men. When synthesising the insights from all 78 papers focusing on futures studies and feminism, gender or women, four conclusions are especially striking: (1) Women and non-Westerners are generally excluded from professional futures studies activities and so are feminist issues or issues of particular relevance for women. (2) Futures studies usually make no attempts to reveal underlying assumptions, i.e. often lack a critical and reflexive perspective, which is needed in order to add a critical feminist perspective and envision feminist futures. (3) Feminist futures are needed as a contrast to hegemonic male and Western technology-orientated futures. Feminist futures are diverse, but focus the well-being of all humans. (4) Futures studies often view women as victims, rather than as drivers for change, which means that their alternative futures are often ignored.NOTICE: this is the authorâs version of a work that was accepted for publication in Futures: The journal of policy, planning and futures studies. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in PUBLICATION, VOL 43, ISSUE 9, 19 July 2011, DOI:10.1016/j.futures.2011.07.002QC 20120117FramKo
Housing Design and Mobility ConvenienceâThe Case of Sweden
A parking space is the beginning and the end of every car journey. Policies aimed at parking spaces are, thus, an effective way of affecting car travel. Policies regarding parking typically mean setting minimum parking requirements to meet the peak demand for parking. However, in several Swedish cities, as well as around Europe, attempts are made to lower the number of parking places. One way is to build homes without parking places for cars and pilot projects with zero-parking have started to materialize. This paper looks into the academic literature in the field of design and architecture to see how parking issues are dealt with. It also looks into ongoing practice by studying three pilot projects in Sweden that challenge the dominant parking norm by planning and building for a new normalâmobility convenience and zero parking. Both the literature and the cases point to little knowledge in the field. However, high demands on âcreative mobility solutionsâ are placed on housing projects without parking places for cars. Even if the effects of sustainability are still unknown, zero parking pilot projects can narrate the possibility of another futureâa future with mobility convenience instead of parking convenience
- âŠ