Single hadron response measurement and calorimeter jet energy scale uncertainty with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

The uncertainty on the calorimeter energy response to jets of particles is derived for the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). First, the calorimeter response to single isolated charged hadrons is measured and compared to the Monte Carlo simulation using proton-proton collisions at centre-of-mass energies of sqrt(s) = 900 GeV and 7 TeV collected during 2009 and 2010. Then, using the decay of K_s and Lambda particles, the calorimeter response to specific types of particles (positively and negatively charged pions, protons, and anti-protons) is measured and compared to the Monte Carlo predictions. Finally, the jet energy scale uncertainty is determined by propagating the response uncertainty for single charged and neutral particles to jets. The response uncertainty is 2-5% for central isolated hadrons and 1-3% for the final calorimeter jet energy scale.Comment: 24 pages plus author list (36 pages total), 23 figures, 1 table, submitted to European Physical Journal

Search for the standard model Higgs boson in the diphoton decay channel with 4.9fb -1 of pp collision data at √s=7TeV with atlas

A search for the standard model Higgs boson is performed in the diphoton decay channel. The data used correspond to an integrated luminosity of 4.9  fb-1 collected with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of √s=7  TeV. In the diphoton mass range 110–150 GeV, the largest excess with respect to the background-only hypothesis is observed at 126.5 GeV, with a local significance of 2.8 standard deviations. Taking the look-elsewhere effect into account in the range 110–150 GeV, this significance becomes 1.5 standard deviations. The standard model Higgs boson is excluded at 95% confidence level in the mass ranges of 113–115 GeV and 134.5–136 GeV

Search for the standard model Higgs boson in the diphoton decay channel with 4.9fb -1 of pp collision data at √s=7TeV with atlas

A search for the standard model Higgs boson is performed in the diphoton decay channel. The data used correspond to an integrated luminosity of 4.9  fb-1 collected with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of √s=7  TeV. In the diphoton mass range 110–150 GeV, the largest excess with respect to the background-only hypothesis is observed at 126.5 GeV, with a local significance of 2.8 standard deviations. Taking the look-elsewhere effect into account in the range 110–150 GeV, this significance becomes 1.5 standard deviations. The standard model Higgs boson is excluded at 95% confidence level in the mass ranges of 113–115 GeV and 134.5–136 GeV

Effects due radioiodine therapy for thyroid cancer in renal glomerular filtration rate: randomized study comparing thyroid hormone withdrawal with the use of recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone (rhTSH)

Foi estudado o ritmo de filtração glomerular (RFG) de pacientes com câncer bem diferenciado da tireoide submetidos à radioiodoterapia (RIT). O estudo avaliou o RFG durante estímulo do hormônio estimulador da tireoide (TSH) por suspensão da reposição hormonal tireoidiana (RHT) ou no uso do hormônio estimulador da tireoide recombinante humano (TSHrh), correlacionou o RFG com o perfil hormonal tireoidiano, avaliou o RFG durante e na semana após a RIT, avaliou o RFG e a dose efetiva de radiação para corpo inteiro e correlacionou métodos de estimativa de RFG. Vinte e oito pacientes incluídos em estudo clínico randomizado não cego foram divididos em dois grupos de 14 pacientes, sendo o grupo A (GA) submetido à suspensão da RHT e o grupo B (GB) ao uso do TSHrh. Os pacientes tiveram antes e após o estímulo do TSH a determinação do RFG por 51Cr-EDTA e coletas séricas do perfil hormonal tireoidiano e creatinina, albumina e ureia, e, após a RIT, colheram exames séricos de creatinina, albumina e ureia, e tiveram estimadas suas doses efetivas de corpo inteiro. Os exames de creatinina, albumina e ureia foram utilizados para estimar o RFG pelas equações de creatinina sérica, Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), e Cockcroft-Gault. O GA apresentou, pelo 51Cr-EDTA, variação de -18,5% do RFG de 94,4±18,6 mL/min antes da suspensão da RHT para 76,2±15,7 mL/min (p=0,0002) e o GB apresentou pelo 51Cr-EDTA variação de 4% do RFG de 90,8±18,4 mL/min antes do TSHrh para 92,6±15,2 mL/min (p=0,64). O RFG variou significativamente só no GA, sem apresentar proporcionalidade entre as variações do hormônio tireoidiano e do RFG. Não houve correlação do RFG com elevação do TSH. Por equações baseadas em creatinina, houve, no GA, queda do RFG durante toda a suspensão da RHT e estabilidade após o retorno da RHT, e, no GB, houve estabilidade do RFG durante todo o estudo. A dose efetiva de corpo inteiro não apresentou diferenças significativas entre os grupos (p=0,76). Na comparação entre o 51Cr-EDTA e as equações para estimativa de RFG, a correlação de Pearson foi de 0,78 para creatinina sérica, 0,79 para MDRD e 0,66 para CockcroftGault, e a comparação das variações do RFG observadas no GA entre o 51Cr-EDTA e a equação por creatinina sérica foram estatisticamente diferentes. Concluiu-se que o RFG apresenta redução na suspensão da RHT, relacionado ao hipotireoidismo e não à elevação de TSH, voltando a estabilizar após retorno da RHT, e que não varia no uso do TSHrh, que a dose efetiva de corpo inteiro não varia entre os grupos proporcionalmente ao RFG, e que a melhor correlação foi do 51Cr-EDTA com a equação MDRDGlomerular filtration rate (GFR) was studied in well differentiated thyroid cancer patients referred for radioiodine therapy (RIT). The study evaluated GFR during thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) stimulation after thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) or after recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone (rhTSH), correlated GFR with thyroid hormone profile, evaluated GFR during and in the week after RIT, evaluated GFR and whole body radiation effective dose, and correlated different methods for GFR determination. 28 patients were included in a non-blinded randomized clinical trial and divided in two groups of 14 patients, being group A (GA) stimulated by THW and group B (GB) stimulated by rhTSH. Patients had GFR determined by 51Cr-EDTA, as well as serum thyroid hormone profile, creatinine, albumin and urea before and after TSH stimulation, and after RIT had determined their serum creatinine, albumin and urea and whole body radiation effective dose. Creatinine, albumin and urea were used to estimate GFR by serum creatinine, Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and Cockcroft-Gault equations. GA presented a -18,5% GFR variation by 51CrEDTA varying from 94,4 ± 18,6 mL/min before THW to 76,2±15,7 mL/min after THW (p=0,0002) while GB presented a 4% GFR variation by 51Cr-EDTA varying from 90,8 ± 18,4 mL/min before TSHrh to 92,6 ± 15,2 mL/min after rhTSH (p=0,64). GFR significantly varied only in GA without presenting proportionality with thyroid hormone variation. There was no correlation between rise in TSH levels and GFR. Creatinine equations demonstrated a sustained reduction in GFR during THW and GFR stability after thyroid hormone reposition, while GB presented stable GFR during the whole study. Whole body radiation effective dose didn\'t present significant differences between the two groups (p=0,76). Comparing 51Cr-EDTA and GFR estimative equations presented Pearson correlation score of 0,78 for serum creatinine, 0,79 for MDRD and 0,66 for Cockcroft-Gault, while comparison between variances in GA between 51Cr-EDTA e serum creatinine equation was significantly different. In conclusion GFR presents a reduction during THW related to hypothyroidism and not to TSH rise and stabilizing after thyroid hormone therapy, GFR does not vary during rhTSH, whole body radiation effective dose does not vary between the two groups proportionally to GFR, and that MDRD equation had the best correlation with 51Cr-EDT