5 research outputs found
SHADOWS OF A TALKING CIRCLE: ABORIGINAL ADVOCACY BEFORE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AND TRIBUNALS
Get PDFInstitutional and Behavioral Economics,
Should the North American Free Trade Agreement Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Cases be Reformed in the Light of Softwood Lumber III?
Get PDFSHADOWS OF A TALKING CIRCLE: ABORIGINAL ADVOCACY BEFORE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AND TRIBUNALS
No full textShould the North American Free Trade Agreement Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Cases be Reformed in the Light of Softwood Lumber III?
Get PDFDoes NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) Chapter 19 make a difference? Dispute settlement and the incentive structure of U.S./Canada unfair trade petitions
No full textNAFTA Chapter 19 sets up bilateral review panels to replace the domestic judicial appeals process of resolving disputes among NAFTA members over the enforcement of unfair trade laws. In principle, such panels can change the incentive structure of filing unfair trade law petitions by reducing the likelihood of an affirmative finding of injurious unfair trade. Using data from U.S. and Canadian unfair trade petition filings, empirical tests show support for this hypothesis. However, a more comprehensive settlement of conflicts will require progressive legal integration, including an extension of national treatment measures to alleged "unfair trade" that is not currently envisaged under the NAFTA. Copyright 2000 Western Economic Association International.
