A Comparative Analysis of Cognitive Deficits in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Fibromyalgia: Impact of Symptoms Severity and Its Clinical Implications

Carmen M Galvez-Sánchez,1,* Stefan Duschek,2,* Gustavo A Reyes del Paso3,* 1Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain; 2Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, UMIT TIROL - University for Health Sciences Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria; 3Department of Psychology, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Carmen M Galvez-Sánchez, Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy, University of Murcia, Building 31, Murcia, 30100, Spain, Tel +34 868 88 868 88 7328, Email [email protected]: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are chronic pain disorders, with clearly distinct pathogenetic mechanisms, frequently accompanied by symptoms like depression, fatigue, insomnia and cognitive problems. This study compared performance in various cognitive domains between patients with FMS and RA. The role of clinical symptoms severity in determine the differences in cognitive performance was also investigated.Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement. In total, 64 FMS patients, 34 RA patients and 32 healthy controls participated, all women. Using factor analysis, questionnaire scores were combined to yield a symptom severity factor, which was used as a control variable in the group comparisons.Results: Without controlling for symptom severity, both patient groups performed worse than controls in all the cognitive domains assessed (visuospatial memory; verbal memory; strategic planning and self-regulation; processing speed, attention and cognitive flexibility; and planning and organizational abilities); overall deficits were greater in FMS than in RA patients. FMS patients reported more severe clinical symptoms (current pain intensity, total pain, state anxiety, depression, fatigue and insomnia) than RA patients. After controlling for symptom severity, a large proportion of the cognitive test parameters no longer differed between FMS and RA patients.Conclusion: The study confirmed significant impairments in attention, memory, and higher cognitive functions in both FMS and RA. The greater deficits seen in FMS patients may at least partly be explained by more severe pain and secondary symptoms. Cognitive screening may facilitate the development of personalized treatment plans to optimize the quality of life of FMS and RA patients.Plain Language Summary: The investigation substantiated noteworthy impairments in attention, memory, and executive functions among individuals diagnosed with Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS) and Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA).The heightened cognitive deficits observed in FMS patients compared to those with RA could be attributed in part to the heightened severity of pain and secondary symptoms characteristic of FMS.Semantic clustering, by leveraging cognitive resources optimally, may serve as a compensatory mechanism for memory deficits and thus warrants inclusion in interventions aimed at assisting patients in coping with cognitive impairments.Incorporating cognitive deficit screenings into routine diagnostic protocols for FMS and RA is recommended, as it may facilitate the development of personalized treatment strategies aimed at enhancing the overall quality of life for affected individuals.Keywords: fibromyalgia syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, cognitive impairments, depression, anxiety, fatigue, insomni

Evaluation of appendicitis risk prediction models in adults with suspected appendicitis

Background Appendicitis is the most common general surgical emergency worldwide, but its diagnosis remains challenging. The aim of this study was to determine whether existing risk prediction models can reliably identify patients presenting to hospital in the UK with acute right iliac fossa (RIF) pain who are at low risk of appendicitis. Methods A systematic search was completed to identify all existing appendicitis risk prediction models. Models were validated using UK data from an international prospective cohort study that captured consecutive patients aged 16–45 years presenting to hospital with acute RIF in March to June 2017. The main outcome was best achievable model specificity (proportion of patients who did not have appendicitis correctly classified as low risk) whilst maintaining a failure rate below 5 per cent (proportion of patients identified as low risk who actually had appendicitis). Results Some 5345 patients across 154 UK hospitals were identified, of which two‐thirds (3613 of 5345, 67·6 per cent) were women. Women were more than twice as likely to undergo surgery with removal of a histologically normal appendix (272 of 964, 28·2 per cent) than men (120 of 993, 12·1 per cent) (relative risk 2·33, 95 per cent c.i. 1·92 to 2·84; P < 0·001). Of 15 validated risk prediction models, the Adult Appendicitis Score performed best (cut‐off score 8 or less, specificity 63·1 per cent, failure rate 3·7 per cent). The Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score performed best for men (cut‐off score 2 or less, specificity 24·7 per cent, failure rate 2·4 per cent). Conclusion Women in the UK had a disproportionate risk of admission without surgical intervention and had high rates of normal appendicectomy. Risk prediction models to support shared decision‐making by identifying adults in the UK at low risk of appendicitis were identified

Psychological impact of fibromyalgia: current perspectives

Carmen M Galvez-S&aacute;nchez,1 Stefan Duschek,2 Gustavo A Reyes del Paso1 1Department of Psychology, University of Ja&eacute;n, Ja&eacute;n, Spain; 2Department of Psychology, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria Abstract: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic disorder characterized by widespread and persistent musculoskeletal pain and other frequent symptoms such as fatigue, insomnia, morning stiffness, cognitive impairment, depression, and anxiety. FMS is also accompanied by different comorbidities like irritable bowel syndrome and chronic fatigue syndrome. Although some factors like negative events, stressful environments, or physical/emotional traumas may act as predisposing conditions, the etiology of FMS remains unknown. There is evidence of a high prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities in FMS (especially depression, anxiety, borderline personality, obsessive-compulsive personality, and post-traumatic stress disorder), which are associated with a worse clinical profile. There is also evidence of high levels of negative affect, neuroticism, perfectionism, stress, anger, and alexithymia in FMS patients. High harm avoidance together with high self-transcendence, low cooperativeness, and low self-directedness have been reported as temperament and character features in FMS patients, respectively. Additionally, FMS patients tend to have a negative self-image and body image perception, as well as low self-esteem and perceived self-efficacy. FMS reduces functioning in physical, psychological, and social spheres, and also has a negative impact on cognitive performance, personal relationships (including sexuality and parenting), work, and activities of daily life. In some cases, FMS patients show suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and consummated suicide. FMS patients perceive the illness as a stigmatized and invisible disorder, and this negative perception hinders their ability to adapt to the disease. Psychological interventions may constitute a beneficial complement to pharmacological treatments in order to improve clinical symptoms and reduce the impact of FMS on health-related quality of life. Keywords: fibromyalgia, background, psychological impact, patients&rsquo; experiences, personality, moo

Central sensitization in knee osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia: Beyond depression and anxiety

Objectives: To determine the psychopathological profile of patients with central sensitization (CS) in a sample of knee osteoarthritis, with and without CS, and fibromyalgia, and to compare their psychopathological profiles. Methods: The final sample consists of 19 patients with osteoarthritis and CS (mean 66.37 years ± 8.77), 41 osteoarthritis patients without CS (mean 66.8 ± 7.39 years), 47 fibromyalgia patients (mean 46.47 years ± 7.92) and 26 control subjects (mean 51.56 years ± 11.41). The psychopathological profile was evaluated with the Millon Multiaxial Clinical Inventory. Results: The average score of MCMI-III reflect higher scores in the fibromyalgia and osteoarthritis-CS groups. Patients with osteoarthritis-CS are more likely to report larger scores in Borderline and Major Depression scales. Fibromyalgia patients are more likely to report more increased scores in Somatoform and Major Depression, versus osteoarthritis-CS group. Fibromyalgia patients versus osteoarthritis without CS are more likely to report higher scores in Schizoid, Depression, Histrionic, Sadistic, Borderline, Somatoform, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Major Depression scales. Discussion: Patients with CS have less differences in their psychopathological profiles as well as in both osteoarthritis groups and greatest differences are obtained between the fibromyalgia and osteoarthritis without CS, so perhaps presence of CS is the key to differentiate those groups and not chronic pain. An exhaustive assessment brings more accurate psychopathological profiles, thus better psychological treatment could be applied.This work was partially supported by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Grant PSI2014-53524-P and PSI2017-83777) and the Agency of University and Research Funding Management of the Catalonia Government (Research Groups SGR2017-1198). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript