4 research outputs found

    ΠŸΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ эффСктивности контСкстной Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠ»Π°ΠΌΡ‹ Π² Π˜Π½Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π½Π΅Ρ‚Π΅

    Get PDF
    РассмотрСны ΠΏΡƒΡ‚ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ эффСктивности Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠ»Π°ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡ‰Π°Π΄ΠΊΠ°Ρ… поисковых систСм. ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΊ Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡŽ Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‡Π΅ΠΉ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡ‹ ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π²Ρ‹Ρ… слов, ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΡƒΠ΅ΠΌΡ‹Ρ… Π² Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠ»Π°ΠΌΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… прСдлоТСниях, Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Π°Π½ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌ измСнСния состава Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡ‹. Π’Ρ‹Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Π°Π½Ρ‹ Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡŽ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡ€Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‹ прСдлоТСния Π½Π° Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠ»Π°ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π°ΡƒΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π΅ Google. Π’Ρ‹ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ€Π΅ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π½Π° основС практичСских Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… коммСрчСской Ρ„ΠΈΡ€ΠΌΡ‹, Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡŽΡ‰Π΅ΠΉΡΡ контСкстной Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠ»Π°ΠΌΠΎΠΉ Π½Π° ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡ‰Π°Π΄ΠΊΠ΅ поисковой систСмы.Розглянуто ΡˆΠ»ΡΡ…ΠΈ підвищСння СфСктивності Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠ»Π°ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΡ— ΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΏΠ°Π½Ρ–Ρ— Π½Π° ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡ‰Π°Π΄ΠΊΠ°Ρ… ΠΏΠΎΡˆΡƒΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ… систСм. Π—Π°ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡ–Π΄Ρ…Ρ–Π΄ Π΄ΠΎ формування Ρ€ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ‡ΠΎΡ— Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΈ ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ… слів, використовуваних Ρƒ Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠ»Π°ΠΌΠ½ΠΈΡ… пропозиціях, Ρ€ΠΎΠ·Ρ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½Ρ–Π·ΠΌ Π·ΠΌΡ–Π½ΠΈ складу Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΈ. Π’ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°Ρ†Ρ–Ρ— Π· формування ΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡ€Π΅ΠΊΡ†Ρ–Ρ— Ρ†Ρ–Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡ†Ρ–Ρ— Π½Π° Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠ»Π°ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡƒ Π°ΡƒΠΊΡ†Ρ–ΠΎΠ½Ρ– Google. Π’ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ½Π°Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π²Ρ–Ρ€ΠΊΡƒ Π·Π°ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ… Ρ€Ρ–ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΡŒ Π½Π° основі ΠΏΡ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈΡ… Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ… ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Ρ†Ρ–ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΡ— Ρ„Ρ–Ρ€ΠΌΠΈ, Ρ‰ΠΎ Π·Π°ΠΉΠΌΠ°Ρ”Ρ‚ΡŒΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Π΅ΠΊΡΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡŽ Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠ»Π°ΠΌΠΎΡŽ Π½Π° ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡ‰Π°Π΄Ρ†Ρ– ΠΏΠΎΡˆΡƒΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ— систСми.During article were examined new ways of Internet search system advertising efficiency increasing. Have been suggested method of creation optimal keywords workgroup(which are used in advertising sentences) approach. Have been worked out recommendations for bid fixing and correction. on Google advertising auction. Suggested conceptions were tested and implemented on real busyness information of internet-advertising company, which is mostly concentrated on context advertisin

    Comparison of intake and systemic relative effect potencies of dioxin-like compounds in female rats after a single oral dose

    No full text
    Risk assessment for mixtures of dioxin-like compounds uses the toxic equivalency factor (TEF) approach. Although current WHO-TEFs are mostly based on oral administration, they are commonly used to determine toxicity equivalencies (TEQs) in human blood or tissues. However, the use of "intake" TEFs to calculate systemic TEQs in for example human blood, has never been validated. In this study, intake and systemic relative effect potencies (REPs) for 1,2,3,7,8-pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (PeCDD), 2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran (4-PeCDF), 3,3β€²,4,4β€²,5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB-126), 2,3β€²,4,4β€²,5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB-118) and 2,3,3β€²,4, 4β€²,5-hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB-156) were compared in rats. The effect potencies were calculated based on administered dose and liver, adipose or plasma concentrations in female Sprague-Dawley rats 3 days after a single oral dose, relative to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Hepatic ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase activity and gene expression of Cyp1a1, 1a2, 1b1 and aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor in liver and peripheral blood lymphocytes were used as endpoints. Results show that plasma-based systemic REPs were generally within a half log range around the intake REPs for all congeners tested, except for 4-PeCDF. Together with our previously reported systemic REPs from a mouse study, these data do not warrant the use of systemic REPs as systemic TEFs for human risk assessment. However, further investigation for plasma-based systemic REPs for 4-PeCDF is desirable

    Comparison of Intake and Systemic Relative Effect Potencies of Dioxin-like Compounds in Female Mice after a Single Oral Dose

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Risk assessment for mixtures of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) is performed using the toxic equivalency factor (TEF) approach. These TEF values are derived mainly from relative effect potencies (REPs) linking an administered dose to an in vivo toxic or biological effect, resulting in "intake" TEFs. At present, there is insufficient data available to conclude that intake TEFs are also applicable for systemic concentrations (e. g., blood and tissues). OBJECTIVE: We compared intake and systemic REPs of 1,2,3,7,8-pentachlorodibenzodioxin (PeCDD), 2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran (4-PeCDF), 3,3', 4,4', 5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB-126), 2,3', 4,4', 5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB-118), and 2,3,3', 4,4', 5-hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB-156) in female C57BL/6 mice 3 days after a single oral dose. METHODS: We calculated intake REPs and systemic REPs based on administered dose and liver, adipose, or plasma concentrations relative to TCDD. Hepatic cytochrome P450 1Al-associated ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) activity and gene expression of Cyp1a1, 1a2 and 1b1 in the liver and peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) were used as biological end points. RESULTS: We observed up to one order of magnitude difference between intake REPs and systemic REPs. Two different patterns were discerned. Compared with intake REPs, systemic REPs based on plasma or adipose levels were higher for PeCDD, 4-PeCDF, and PCB-126 but lower for the mono-ortho PCBs 118 and 156. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these mouse data, the comparison between intake REPs and systemic REPs reveals significant congener-specific differences that warrants the development of systemic TEFs to calculate toxic equivalents (TEQs) in blood and body tissues

    Comparison of intake and systemic relative effect potencies of dioxin-like compounds in female rats after a single oral dose

    No full text
    Risk assessment for mixtures of dioxin-like compounds uses the toxic equivalency factor (TEF) approach. Although current WHO-TEFs are mostly based on oral administration, they are commonly used to determine toxicity equivalencies (TEQs) in human blood or tissues. However, the use of "intake" TEFs to calculate systemic TEQs in for example human blood, has never been validated. In this study, intake and systemic relative effect potencies (REPs) for 1,2,3,7,8-pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (PeCDD), 2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran (4-PeCDF), 3,3β€²,4,4β€²,5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB-126), 2,3β€²,4,4β€²,5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB-118) and 2,3,3β€²,4, 4β€²,5-hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB-156) were compared in rats. The effect potencies were calculated based on administered dose and liver, adipose or plasma concentrations in female Sprague-Dawley rats 3 days after a single oral dose, relative to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Hepatic ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase activity and gene expression of Cyp1a1, 1a2, 1b1 and aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor in liver and peripheral blood lymphocytes were used as endpoints. Results show that plasma-based systemic REPs were generally within a half log range around the intake REPs for all congeners tested, except for 4-PeCDF. Together with our previously reported systemic REPs from a mouse study, these data do not warrant the use of systemic REPs as systemic TEFs for human risk assessment. However, further investigation for plasma-based systemic REPs for 4-PeCDF is desirable
    corecore