Variables related to sexual prejudice among Mexican health science students

The stigmatization and discrimination of non-heterosexual persons is a reality in some institutions of the Health Services, and among health sciences students. Objectives: To describe and predict the level of sexual prejudice in health sciences students, taking into account a set of qualitative and numerical variables on socio-demographic data, sexual life, social life, university (private or public) the student’s major (medicine or psychology), and clinical aspects. Methodology: A socio-demographic and life-history data questionnaire, an 8-item homophobia scale and a 16-item internalized homonegativity scale were applied to a non-probabilistic sample composed of 231 health sciences students. The predictive models were estimated by analyses of multinomial and ordinal regression. Results: Twelve percent of participants exhibited an attitude of open rejection towards nonheterosexual persons (including 0.9% who exhibited extreme rejection). Non-heterosexual orientation, having non-heterosexual friends and acceptance of one’s own homosexual desires were variables associated with lower levels of open rejection towards non-heterosexual persons. Only the two latter variables were significant predictive variables; they explained 21% of the variance in the ordinal regression model and 27% in the multinomial regression model. The percentage of the correct classification of cases of acceptance was high but the percentage of the correct classification of cases of rejection was low. Conclusion: The level of open rejection towards non-heterosexual persons is low. An exclusively heterosexual identity, affirming not to share aspects of the sexual sphere and not having personal contact with the stigmatized subject are determinants of open rejection. There exist other variables that were not taken into account in this study, as is deduced by the high percentage of unexplained varianc

Real-Time Context-Aware Microservice Architecture for Predictive Analytics and Smart Decision-Making

The impressive evolution of the Internet of Things and the great amount of data flowing through the systems provide us with an inspiring scenario for Big Data analytics and advantageous real-time context-aware predictions and smart decision-making. However, this requires a scalable system for constant streaming processing, also provided with the ability of decision-making and action taking based on the performed predictions. This paper aims at proposing a scalable architecture to provide real-time context-aware actions based on predictive streaming processing of data as an evolution of a previously provided event-driven service-oriented architecture which already permitted the context-aware detection and notification of relevant data. For this purpose, we have defined and implemented a microservice-based architecture which provides real-time context-aware actions based on predictive streaming processing of data. As a result, our architecture has been enhanced twofold: on the one hand, the architecture has been supplied with reliable predictions through the use of predictive analytics and complex event processing techniques, which permit the notification of relevant context-aware information ahead of time. On the other, it has been refactored towards a microservice architecture pattern, highly improving its maintenance and evolution. The architecture performance has been evaluated with an air quality case study

Selective rearrangement of Nd3+ centers in LiNbO3 under ferroelectric domain inversion by electron beam writing

The following article appeared in Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 78.1 (2008): 014114 and may be found at https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.014114Different values of the electronic charge provided by a direct electron beam writing system have been used to produce polarization inverted domain regions in the micrometer range on Nd3+ optically activated LiNbO3. The effect of the electronic charge on the Nd3+ center structure has been studied by means of low-temperature luminescence from Nd3+ ions. The axial crystal field acting on the Nd3+ centers has been analyzed through the F4 3/2 energy-level splitting of the Nd3+ ions. From there we have determined the position of Nd3+ ions into the Li+ octahedra for the different unequivalent centers in domains reversed with different electronic doses. The results show that the axial crystal field acting on the unequivalent Nd3+ centers can be selectively modified by means of the different doses applied to produce the inversion of the polarization. Moreover, a control of the discrete shifts suffered by the Nd3+ ions into the Li+ octahedra after the inversion process can be carried out in the range 0-0.02Å by selecting the type of Nd center to be shifted by means of the different electronic charge. The behavior of each Nd3+ center after the polarization inversion under different doses can be discriminated and the different nature, as well as the polar character of the Nd3+ centers, is clearly manifeste

Leaders' sustainability competences and small and medium‐sized enterprises outcomes: the role of social entrepreneurial orientation

Financiado para publicación en acceso aberto: Universidade de Vigo/CISUGThe market for socially conscious products and services has grown exponentially in the last years. Consequently, adding social value is among the great challenges that companies have to face nowadays. In view of this, companies need leaders with a set of specific skills that prepares them to act and compete in this new environment. This is especially true for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which are even more dependent on their leaders' competences. The aim of this article is to analyse the influence of leaders' sustainability competences on the social entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs of the tourism sector, as well as the influence of this strategy on the firm's performance. The methodology used to validate the measurement scales is exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and the structural equation modelling technique is applied to analyse the causal relationships proposed in the model. The results show that sustainability competences positively affect social entrepreneurial orientation; specifically, the social risk-taking and proactivity competence has a positive influence on the economic and social performance of SMEs, and in particular, on their green innovation performance. These results highlight the key role that leaders' competences have in SMEs' social orientation and thus, the importance of training in competences for sustainable development

Nd3+ ion shift under domain inversion by electron beam writing in LiNb O3

The following article appeared in Applied Physics Letters 90.14 (2007): 141901 and may be found at https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.2719036Ferroelectric domain inversion has been obtained in Nd3+ doped lithium niobate by means of direct electron beam writing. The local effects of the polarization inversion on the optical transitions of Nd3+ ions have been studied by low temperature high resolution site selective spectroscopy. Inverted regions present different axial crystal field acting over Nd3+ ions compared with noninverted (original) regions. The results can be interpreted in terms of slight shifts of Nd3+ ions along the ferroelectric c axis within the Li+ octahedrons, as a result of the lattice rearrangement after the domain inversion processe

The first de novo transcriptome of pepino (Solanum muricatum): assembly, comprehensive analysis and comparison with the closely related species S. caripense, potato and tomato

[EN] Background Solanum sect. Basarthrum is phylogenetically very close to potatoes (Solanum sect. Petota) and tomatoes (Solanum sect. Lycopersicon), two groups with great economic importance, and for which Solanum sect. Basarthrum represents a tertiary gene pool for breeding. This section includes the important regional cultigen, the pepino (Solanum muricatum), and several wild species. Among the wild species, S. caripense is prominent due to its major involvement in the origin of pepino and its wide geographical distribution. Despite the value of the pepino as an emerging crop, and the potential for gene transfer from both the pepino and S. caripense to potatoes and tomatoes, there has been virtually no genomic study of these species. Results Using Illumina HiSeq 2000, RNA-Seq was performed with a pool of three tissues (young leaf, flowers in pre-anthesis and mature fruits) from S. muricatum and S. caripense, generating almost 111,000,000 reads among the two species. A high quality de novo transcriptome was assembled from S. muricatum clean reads resulting in 75,832 unigenes with an average length of 704 bp. These unigenes were functionally annotated based on similarity of public databases. We used Blast2GO, to conduct an exhaustive study of the gene ontology, including GO terms, EC numbers and KEGG pathways. Pepino unigenes were compared to both potato and tomato genomes in order to determine their estimated relative position, and to infer gene prediction models. Candidate genes related to traits of interest in other Solanaceae were evaluated by presence or absence and compared with S. caripense transcripts. In addition, by studying five genes, the phylogeny of pepino and five other members of the family, Solanaceae, were studied. The comparison of S. caripense reads against S. muricatum assembled transcripts resulted in thousands of intra- and interspecific nucleotide-level variants. In addition, more than 1000 SSRs were identified in the pepino transcriptome. Conclusions This study represents the first genomic resource for the pepino. We suggest that the data will be useful not only for improvement of the pepino, but also for potato and tomato breeding and gene transfer. The high quality of the transcriptome presented here also facilitates comparative studies in the genus Solanum. The accurate transcript annotation will enable us to figure out the gene function of particular traits of interest. The high number of markers (SSR and nucleotide-level variants) obtained will be useful for breeding programs, as well as studies of synteny, diversity evolution, and phylogeny.Herraiz García, FJ.; Blanca Postigo, JM.; Ziarsolo Areitioaurtena, P.; Gramazio, P.; Plazas Ávila, MDLO.; Anderson, GJ.; Prohens Tomás, J.... (2016). The first de novo transcriptome of pepino (Solanum muricatum): assembly, comprehensive analysis and comparison with the closely related species S. caripense, potato and tomato. BMC Genomics. 17(321). doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2656-817321Anderson GJ, Jansen RK, Kim Y. The origin and relationships of the pepino, Solanum muricatum (Solanaceae): DNA restriction fragment evidence. Econ Bot. 1996;50:369–80.Anderson GJ, Martine CT, Prohens J, Nuez F. Solanum perlongistylum and S. catilliflorum, new endemic Peruvian species of Solanum, Section Basarthrum, are close relatives of the domesticated pepino, S. muricatum. Novon. 2006;16:161–7.Rodríguez-Burruezo A, Prohens J, Fita AM. Breeding strategies for improving the performance and fruit quality of the pepino (Solanum muricatum): A model for the enhancement of underutilized exotic fruits. Food Res Int. 2011;44:1927–35.Yalçin H. Effect of ripening period on composition of pepino (Solanum muricatum) fruit grown in Turkey. Afr J Biotechnol. 2010;9:3901–3.Abouelnasr H, Li Y-Y, Zhang Z-Y, Liu J-Y, Li S-F, Li D-W, Yu J-L, McBeath JH, Han C-G. First Report of Potato Virus H on Solanum muricatum in China. Plant Dis. 2014;98:1016.Spooner DM, Anderson GJ, Jansen RK. Chloroplast DNA evidence for the interrelationships of tomatoes, potatoes, and pepinos (Solanaceae). Am J Bot. 1993;80:676–88.Sarkinen T, Bohs L, Olmstead RG, Knapp S. A phylogenetic framework for evolutionary study of the nightshades (Solanaceae): a dated 1000-tip tree. BMC Evol Biol. 2013;13:214.Nakitandwe J, Trognitz FCH, Trognitz BR. Genetic mapping of Solanum caripense, a wild relative of pepino dulce, tomato and potato, and a genetic resource for resistance to potato late blight. In: VI International Solanaceae Conference: Genomics Meets Biodiversity 745. 2006. p. 333–42.Sakomoto K, Taguchi T. Regeneration of intergeneric somatic hybrid plants between Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum muricatum. Theor Appl Genet. 1991;81:509–13.Bernardello LM, Anderson GJ. Karyotypic studies in Solanum section Basarthrum (Solanaceae). Am J Bot. 1990;77:420–31.Arumuganathan K, Earle ED. Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol Biol Report. 2004;9:208–18.Spooner DM, Rodríguez F, Polgár Z, Ballard HE, Jansky SH. Genomic origins of potato polyploids: GBSSI gene sequencing data. Crop Sci. 2008;48(Supplement to crop science):27–36.Herraiz FJ, Vilanova S, Andújar I, Torrent D, Plazas M, Gramazio P, Prohens J. Morphological and molecular characterization of local varieties, modern cultivars and wild relatives of an emerging vegetable crop, the pepino (Solanum muricatum), provides insight into its diversity, relationships and breeding history. Euphytica. 2015;206:301–18.Trognitz FC, Trognitz BR. Survey of resistance gene analogs in Solanum caripense, a relative of potato and tomato, and update on R gene genealogy. Mol Genet Genomics. 2005;274:595–605.Hajjar R, Hodgkin T. The use of wild relatives in crop improvement: a survey of developments over the last 20 years. Euphytica. 2007;156:1–13.Doebley JF, Gaut BS, Smith BD. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell. 2006;127:1309–21.Blanca JM, Prohens J, Anderson GJ, Zuriaga E, Canizares J, Nuez F. AFLP and DNA sequence variation in an Andean domesticate, pepino (Solanum muricatum, Solanaceae): implications for evolution and domestication. Am J Bot. 2007;94:1219–29.Rodríguez-Burruezo A, Prohens J, Nuez F. Wild relatives can contribute to the improvement of fruit quality in pepino (Solanum muricatum). Euphytica. 2003;129:311–8.Herraiz FJ, Villaño D, Plazas M, Vilanova S, Ferreres F, Prohens J, Moreno DA. Phenolic profile and biological activities of the pepino (Solanum muricatum) fruit and its wild relative S. caripense. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:394.Leiva-Brondo M, Prohens J, Nuez F. Characterization of pepino accessions and hybrids resistant to Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV). J Food Agric Env. 2006;4:138.Nakitandwe J, Trognitz F, Trognitz B. Reliable allele detection using SNP-based PCR primers containing Locked Nucleic Acid: application in genetic mapping. Plant Methods. 2007;3:2.Andrivon D. The origin of Phytophthora infestans populations present in Europe in the 1840s: a critical review of historical and scientific evidence. Plant Pathol. 1996;45:1027–35.Prohens J, Ruiz JJ, Nuez F. The pepino (Solanum muricatum, Solanaceae): A “new” crop with a history. Econ Bot. 1996;50:355–68.Heiser CB. Origin and Variability of the Pepino (Solanum Muricatum). In: Preliminary Report. 1964.Ahmad H, Khan A, Muhammad K, Nadeem MS, Ahmad W, Iqbal S, Nosheen A, Akbar N, Ahmad I, Que Y. Morphogenetic study of pepino and other members of solanaceae family. Am J Plant Sci. 2014;5:3761.Haas BJ, Papanicolaou A, Yassour M, Grabherr M, Blood PD, Bowden J, Couger MB, Eccles D, Li B, Lieber M. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:1494–512.Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, Adiconis X, Fan L, Raychowdhury R, Zeng Q. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:644–52.Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:57–63.McKain MR, Wickett N, Zhang Y, Ayyampalayam S, McCombie WR, Chase MW, Pires JC, de Pamphilis CW, Leebens-Mack J. Phylogenomic analysis of transcriptome data elucidates co-occurrence of a paleopolyploid event and the origin of bimodal karyotypes in Agavoideae (Asparagaceae). Am J Bot. 2012;99:397–406.Barker MS, Vogel H, Schranz ME. Paleopolyploidy in the Brassicales: analyses of the Cleome transcriptome elucidate the history of genome duplications in Arabidopsis and other Brassicales. Genome Biol Evol. 2009;1:391–9.Rensink W, Lee Y, Liu J, Iobst S, Ouyang S, Buell CR. Comparative analyses of six solanaceous transcriptomes reveal a high degree of sequence conservation and species-specific transcripts. BMC Genomics. 2005;6:124.Koenig D, Jimenez-Gomez JM, Kimura S, Fulop D, Chitwood DH, Headland LR, Kumar R, Covington MF, Devisetty UK, Tat A V, Tohge T, Bolger A, Schneeberger K, Ossowski S, Lanz C, Xiong G, Taylor-Teeples M, Brady SM, Pauly M, Weigel D, Usadel B, Fernie AR, Peng J, Sinha NR, Maloof JN. Comparative transcriptomics reveals patterns of selection in domesticated and wild tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:E2655–62.Blanca JM, Cañizares J, Ziarsolo P, Esteras C, Mir G, Nuez F, Garcia-Mas J, Picó MB. Melon transcriptome characterization: Simple sequence repeats and single nucleotide polymorphisms discovery for high throughput genotyping across the species. Plant Genome. 2011;4:118–31.Blanca J, Canizares J, Roig C, Ziarsolo P, Nuez F, Pico B. Transcriptome characterization and high throughput SSRs and SNPs discovery in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). BMC Genomics. 2011;12:104.Howe GT, Yu J, Knaus B, Cronn R, Kolpak S, Dolan P, Lorenz WW, Dean JF. A SNP resource for Douglas-fir: de novo transcriptome assembly and SNP detection and validation. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:137.Consortium TG. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature. 2012;485:635–41.Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium. Genome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato. Nature. 2011;475:189–95.Anderson GJ, Jansen RK. Biosystematic and molecular systematic studies of Solanum section Basarthrum and the origin and relationships of the pepino (S. muricatum). In: Proceedings of the VI Congreso Latinoamericano de botanica: Mar del Plata, Argentina. 1994. p. 2–8.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–402.Swiss Prot [ http://web.expasy.org/docs/swiss-prot_guideline.html ]. Accessed 29 Apr 2016.SGN release versionITAG2.4 [ ftp://ftp.sgn.cornell.edu/tomato_genome/annotation/ ]. Accessed 29 Apr 2016.Uniref [ http://www.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot/database/download.html ]. Accessed 29 Apr 2016.Wei D-D, Chen E-H, Ding T-B, Chen S-C, Dou W, Wang J-J. De novo assembly, gene annotation, and marker discovery in stored-product pest Liposcelis entomophila (Enderlein) using transcriptome sequences. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80046.Li D, Deng Z, Qin B, Liu X, Men Z. De novo assembly and characterization of bark transcriptome using Illumina sequencing and development of EST-SSR markers in rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.). BMC Genomics. 2012;13:192.Lulin H, Xiao Y, Pei S, Wen T, Shangqin H. The first Illumina-based de novo transcriptome sequencing and analysis of safflower flowers. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38653.Mitraki A, Barge A, Chroboczek J, Andrieu JP, Gagnon J, Ruigrok RWH. Nomenclature committee of the international union of biochemistry and molecular biology (NC-IUBMB). Eur J Biochem. 1999;264:610–50.Sierro N, Battey JN, Ouadi S, Bovet L, Goepfert S, Bakaher N, Peitsch MC, Ivanov N V. Reference genomes and transcriptomes of Nicotiana sylvestris and Nicotiana tomentosiformis. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R60.Garzon-Martinez GA, Zhu ZI, Landsman D, Barrero LS, Marino-Ramirez L. The Physalis peruviana leaf transcriptome: assembly, annotation and gene model prediction. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:151.Wang L, Li J, Zhao J, He C. Evolutionary developmental genetics of fruit morphological variation within the Solanaceae. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:248.Iseli C, Jongeneel CV, Bucher P. ESTScan: a program for detecting, evaluating, and reconstructing potential coding regions in EST sequences. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol. 1999;99:138–48.Peralta IE, Spooner DM. Granule-bound starch synthase (GBSSI) gene phylogeny of wild tomatoes (Solanum L. section Lycopersicon [Mill.] Wettst. subsection Lycopersicon). Am J Bot. 2001;88:1888–902.Martins TR, Barkman TJ, Smith JF. Reconstruction of Solanaceae phylogeny using the nuclear gene SAMT. Syst Bot. 2005;30:435–47.Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.Wang Y, Diehl A, Wu F, Vrebalov J, Giovannoni J, Siepel A, Tanksley SD. Sequencing and comparative analysis of a conserved syntenic segment in the Solanaceae. Genetics. 2008;180:391–408.Garrison E. FreeBayes. In: Marth Lab. 2010.Collins DW, Jukes TH. Rates of transition and transversion in coding sequences since the human-rodent divergence. Genomics. 1994;20:386–96.Xie F, Burklew CE, Yang Y, Liu M, Xiao P, Zhang B, Qiu D. De novo sequencing and a comprehensive analysis of purple sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) transcriptome. Planta. 2012;236:101–13.Mooers AØ, Holmes EC. The evolution of base composition and phylogenetic inference. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000;15:365–9.Aoki K, Yano K, Suzuki A, Kawamura S, Sakurai N, Suda K, Kurabayashi A, Suzuki T, Tsugane T, Watanabe M, Ooga K, Torii M, Narita T, Shin-I T, Kohara Y, Yamamoto N, Takahashi H, Watanabe Y, Egusa M, Kodama M, Ichinose Y, Kikuchi M, Fukushima S, Okabe A, Arie T, Sato Y, Yazawa K, Satoh S, Omura T, Ezura H, et al. Large-scale analysis of full-length cDNAs from the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivar Micro-Tom, a reference system for the Solanaceae genomics. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:210.Crookshanks M, Emmersen J, Welinder KG, Nielsen KL. The potato tuber transcriptome: analysis of 6077 expressed sequence tags. FEBS Lett. 2001;506:123–6.Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:27–30.Lester RN. Evolutionary relationships of tomato, potato, pepino, and wild species of Lycopersicon and Solanum. In: Hawkes JG, Lester RN, Nee M, Estrad N, editors. Solanaceae III Taxonomy, Chem Evol Kew Linn Soc London. 1991. p. 283–301.Butelli E, Titta L, Giorgio M, Mock H-P, Matros A, Peterek S, Schijlen EGWM, Hall RD, Bovy AG, Luo J, Martin C. Enrichment of tomato fruit with health-promoting anthocyanins by expression of select transcription factors. Nat Biotech. 2008;26:1301–8.Clé C, Hill LM, Niggeweg R, Martin CR, Guisez Y, Prinsen E, Jansen MAK. Modulation of chlorogenic acid biosynthesis in Solanum lycopersicum; consequences for phenolic accumulation and UV-tolerance. Phytochemistry. 2008;69:2149–56.Niggeweg R, Michael AJ, Martin C. Engineering plants with increased levels of the antioxidant chlorogenic acid. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:746–54.Prohens J, Sánchez MC, Rodríguez-Burruezo A, Cámara M, Torija E, Nuez F. Morphological and physico-chemical characteristics of fruits of pepino (Solanum muricatum), wild relatives (S. caripense and S. tabanoense) and interspecific hybrids. Implications in pepino breeding. Eur J Hortic Sci. 2005;70:224.Blanca J, Montero-Pau J, Sauvage C, Bauchet G, Illa E, D’iez MJ, Francis D, Causse M, van der Knaap E, Cañizares J. Genomic variation in tomato, from wild ancestors to contemporary breeding accessions. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:1–19.Rong J, Lammers Y, Strasburg JL, Schidlo NS, Ariyurek Y, de Jong TJ, Klinkhamer PGL, Smulders MJM, Vrieling K. New insights into domestication of carrot from root transcriptome analyses. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:895.Swanson-Wagner R, Briskine R, Schaefer R, Hufford MB, Ross-Ibarra J, Myers CL, Tiffin P, Springer NM. Reshaping of the maize transcriptome by domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(29):11878–83.Feng Z, Zhang B, Ding W, Liu X, Yang D-L, Wei P, Cao F, Zhu S, Zhang F, Mao Y. Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res. 2013;23:1229–32.Park T, Vleeshouwers V, Jacobsen E, Van Der Vossen E, Visser RGF. Molecular breeding for resistance to Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.): a perspective of cisgenesis. Plant Breed. 2009;128:109–17.Hedges SB, Dudley J, Kumar S. TimeTree: a public knowledge-base of divergence times among organisms. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:2971–2.Zhai L, Xu L, Wang Y, Cheng H, Chen Y, Gong Y, Liu L. Novel and useful genic-SSR markers from de novo transcriptome sequencing of radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Mol Breed. 2014;33:611–24.Ahn Y-K, Tripathi S, Kim J-H, Cho Y-I, Lee H-E, Kim D-S, Woo J-G, Yoon M-K. Microsatellite marker information from high-throughput next-generation sequence data of Capsicum annuum varieties Mandarin and Blackcluster. Sci Hortic. 2014;170:123–30.Metzgar D, Bytof J, Wills C. Selection against frameshift mutations limits microsatellite expansion in coding DNA. Genome Res. 2000;10:72–80.Li Y, Korol AB, Fahima T, Beiles A, Nevo E. Microsatellites: genomic distribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: a review. Mol Ecol. 2002;11:2453–65.Varshney RK, Graner A, Sorrells ME. Genic microsatellite markers in plants: features and applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2005;23:48–55.Anderson GJ. The variation and evolution of selected species of Solanum section Basarthrum. Brittonia. 1975;27:209–22.Murray BG, Hammett KRW, Grigg FDW. Seed set and breeding system in the pepino Solanum muricatum Ait., Solanaceae. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam). 1992;49:83–92.Perez-de-Castro AM, Vilanova S, Canizares J, Pascual L, Blanca JM, Diez MJ, Prohens J, Pico B. Application of genomic tools in plant breeding. Curr Genomics. 2012;13:179–95.Ruiz JJ, Prohens J, Nuez F. “Sweet Round” and “Sweet Long”: Two pepino cultivars for Mediterranean, climates. HortSci. 1997;32:751–2.FASTAQC [ http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ ]. Accessed 29 Apr 2016.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–9.Li B, Dewey CN. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:323.Blanca JM, Pascual L, Ziarsolo P, Nuez F, Cañizares J. ngs_backbone: a pipeline for read cleaning, mapping and SNP calling using Next Generation Sequence. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:1–8.Conesa A, Gotz S. Blast2GO: A comprehensive suite for functional analysis in plant genomics. Int J Plant Genomics. 2008;2008:619832.Lippman ZB, Cohen O, Alvarez JP, Abu-Abied M, Pekker I, Paran I, Eshed Y, Zamir D. The making of a compound inflorescence in tomato and related nightshades. PLoS Biol. 2008;6:e288.Zhang Y, Hu Z, Chu G, Huang C, Tian S, Zhao Z, Chen G. Anthocyanin accumulation and molecular analysis of anthocyanin biosynthesis-associated genes in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). J Agric Food Chem. 2014;62:2906–12.Kohara A, Nakajima C, Hashimoto K, Ikenaga T, Tanaka H, Shoyama Y, Yoshida S, Muranaka T. A novel glucosyltransferase involved in steroid saponin biosynthesis in Solanum aculeatissimum. Plant Mol Biol. 2005;57:225–39.Gramazio P, Prohens J, Plazas M, Andujar I, Herraiz FJ, Castillo E, Knapp S, Meyer RS, Vilanova S. Location of chlorogenic acid biosynthesis pathway and polyphenol oxidase genes in a new interspecific anchored linkage map of eggplant. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:350–014–0350–z.Klann E, Yelle S, Bennett AB. Tomato fruit Acid invertase complementary DNA: nucleotide and deduced amino Acid sequences. Plant Physiol. 1992;99:351–3.Lam Cheng KL. Golden2--like (GLK2) Transcription Factor: Developmental Control of Tomato Fruit Photosynthesis and Its Contribution to Ripe Fruit Characteristics. Davis: University of California; 2013.Mott R. EST_GENOME: A program to align spliced DNA sequences to unspliced genomic DNA. Comput Appl Biosci. 1997;13:477–8.EMBOSS [ http://www.bioinformatics.nl/emboss-explorer/ ]. Accessed 29 Apr 2016.Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, Jones SJ, Marra MA. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19:1639–45.Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2947–8.Abajian C. Sputnik. University of Washington Department of Molecular Biotechnology. 1994.[ http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/ITMI/EST-SSR/LaRota ]. Accessed 29 Apr 2016

A highly efficient organogenesis protocol based on zeatin riboside for in vitro regeneration of eggplant

[EN] Background Efficient organogenesis induction in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) is required for multiple in vitro culture applications. In this work, we aimed at developing a universal protocol for efficient in vitro regeneration of eggplant mainly based on the use of zeatin riboside (ZR). We evaluated the effect of seven combinations of ZR with indoleacetic acid (IAA) for organogenic regeneration in five genetically diverse S. melongena and one S. insanum L. accessions using two photoperiod conditions. In addition, the effect of six different concentrations of indolebutyric acid (IBA) in order to promote rooting was assessed to facilitate subsequent acclimatization of plants. The ploidy level of regenerated plants was studied. Results In a first experiment with accessions MEL1 and MEL3, significant (p < 0.05) differences were observed for the four factors evaluated for organogenesis from cotyledon, hypocotyl and leaf explants, with the best results obtained (9 and 11 shoots for MEL1 and MEL3, respectively) using cotyledon tissue, 16 h light / 8 h dark photoperiod conditions, and medium E6 (2 mg/L of ZR and 0 mg/L of IAA). The best combination of conditions was tested in the other four accessions and confirmed its high regeneration efficiency per explant when using both cotyledon and hypocotyl tissues. The best rooting media was R2 (1 mg/L IBA). The analysis of ploidy level revealed that between 25 and 50% of the regenerated plantlets were tetraploid. Conclusions An efficient protocol for organogenesis of both cultivated and wild accessions of eggplant, based on the use of ZR, is proposed. The universal protocol developed may be useful for fostering in vitro culture applications in eggplant requiring regeneration of plants and, in addition, allows developing tetraploid plants without the need of antimitotic chemicals.This research was funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades, Agencia Estatal de Investigacion and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (grant RTI-2018-094592-B-100 from MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE) and by Universitat Politecnica de Valencia. The Spanish Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte funded a predoctoral fellowship granted to Edgar Garcia-Fortea (FPU17/02389). The Generalitat Valenciana and Fondo Social Europeo funded a post-doctoral fellowship granted to Mariola Plazas (APOSTD/2018/014). The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science funded a post-doctoral fellowship granted to Pietro Gramazio (FY 2019 Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research in Japan [Standard]). The funding bodies were not involved in the design of the study, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, or drafting of the manuscript.García-Fortea, E.; Lluch-Ruiz, A.; Pineda Chaza, BJ.; García-Pérez, A.; Bracho-Gil, JP.; Plazas Ávila, MDLO.; Gramazio, P.... (2020). A highly efficient organogenesis protocol based on zeatin riboside for in vitro regeneration of eggplant. BMC Plant Biology. 20(1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2215-yS116201FAO. FAOSTAT Food and Agriculture. 2019. http://www.fao.org/faostat. Accessed 18 July 2019.Gürbüza N, Uluişikb S, Frarya A, Frary A, Doğanlar S. Health benefits and bioactive compounds of eggplant. Food Chem. 2018;268:602–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.06.093.Rivas-Sendra A, Corral-Martínez P, Camacho-Fernández C, Seguí-Simarro JM. Improved regeneration of eggplant doubled haploids from microspore-derived calli through organogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015;122:759–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-015-0791-6.Shelton AM, Hossain MJ, Paranjape V, Azad AK, Rahman ML, Khan ASMMR, Prodhan MZH, Rashid MA, Majumder R, Hossain MA, Hussain SS, Huesing JE, McCandless L. Bt eggplant project in Bangladesh: history, present status, and future direction. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018;6:106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00106.Muren RC. Haploid plant induction from unpollinated ovaries in onion. Hortscience. 1989;24:833–4.Campion B, Bohanec B, Javornik B. Gynogenic lines of onion (Allium cepa L.): evidence of their homozygosity. Theor Appl Genet. 1995;91:598–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223285.Geoffriau E, Kahane R, Rancillac M. Variation of gynogenesis ability in onion (Allium cepa L.). Euphytica. 1997;94:37–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002949606450.Cardoso JC, Teixeira da Silva JA. Gerbera micropropagation. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31:1344–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOTECHADV.2013.05.008.Gleddie S, Keller W, Setterfield G. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaf explants and cell suspensions of Solanum melongena (eggplant). Can J Bot. 1983;61:656–66. https://doi.org/10.1139/b83-074.Sharma P, Rajam MV. Genotype, explant and position effects on organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis in eggplant ( Solanum melongena L.). J Exp Bot. 1995;46:135–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/46.1.135.Franklin G, Sheeba CJ, Lakshmi SG. Regeneration of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) from root explants. Vitr Cell Dev Biol – Plant. 2004;40:188–91. https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2003491.Taher D, Solberg S, Prohens J, Chou Y, Rakha M, Wu T. World vegetable center eggplant collection: origin, composition, seed dissemination and utilization in breeding. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1484. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01484.Altpeter F, Springer NM, Bartley LE, Blechl AE, Brutnell TP, Citovsky V, Conrad LJ, Gelvin SB, Jackson DP, Kausch AP, Lemaux PG, Medford JI, Orozco-Cárdenas ML, Tricoli DM, Van Eck J, Voytas DF, Walbot V, Wang K, Zhang ZJ, Stewart CN. Advancing crop transformation in the era of genome editing. Plant Cell. 2016;28:1510–20. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00196.Haque E, Taniguchi H, Hassan MM, Bhowmik P, Karim MR, Śmiech M, Zhao K, Rahman M, Islam T. Application of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology for the improvement of crops cultivated in tropical climates: recent progress, prospects, and challenges. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:617. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00617.Limera C, Sabbadini S, Sweet JB, Mezzetti B. New biotechnological tools for the genetic improvement of major woody fruit species. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1418. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01418.Gilissen LJW, van Staveren MJ, Creemers-Molenaar J, Verhoeven HA. Development of polysomaty in seedlings and plants of Cucumis sativus L. Plant Sci. 1993;91:171–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(93)90140-U.Smulders MJM, Rus-Kortekaas W, Gilissen LJW. Development of polysomaty during differentiation in diploid and tetraploid tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants. Plant Sci. 1994;97:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(94)90107-4.Mishiba KI, Mii M. Polysomaty analysis in diploid and tetraploid Portulaca grandiflora. Plant Sci. 2000;156:213–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00257-0.Meric C, Dane F. Determination of ploidy levels in Ipheion uniflorum (R. C. Graham) Rafin (Liliaceae). Acta Biol Hung. 2005;56:129–36. https://doi.org/10.1556/ABiol.56.2005.1-2.13.Letham DS. Purification and probable identity of a new cytokinin in sweet corn extracts. Life Sci. 1966;5:551–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(66)90175-5.Narasimhulu SB, Kirti PB, Prakash S, Chopra VL. Rapid and high frequency shoot regeneration from hypocotyl protoplasts of Brassica nigra. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1993;32:35–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040113.Bhadra SK, Hammatt N, Power JB, Davey MR. A reproducible procedure for plant regeneration from seedling hypocotyl protoplasts of Vigna sublobata L. Plant Cell Rep. 1994;14:175–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233785.Hossain M, Imanishi S, Egashira H. An improvement of tomato protoplast culture for rapid plant regeneration. PCTOC. 1995;42:141–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034230.Yadav NR, Sticklen MB. Direct and efficient plant regeneration from leaf explants of Solanum tuberosum l. cv. Bintje. Plant Cell Rep. 1995;14:645–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232730.Chen L, Adachi T. Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis from cotyledon protoplast of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Breed Sci. 1994;44:257–62. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs1951.44.257.Richwine AM, Tipton JL, Thompson GA. Establishment of aloe, gasteria, and haworthia shoot cultures from inflorescence explants. HortScience. 1995;30:1443–4. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.30.7.1443.Rolli E, Brunoni F, Bruni R. An optimized method for in vitro propagation of african baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) using two-node segments. Plant Biosyst. 2016;150:750–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2014.991362.Farooq QUA, Fatima A, Murtaza N, Hussain FF. In vitro propagation of olive cultivars ‘Frontio’, ‘Earlik’, ‘Gemlik’. Acta Hortic. 2017:249–56. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1152.34.Singh AK, Verma SS, Bansal KC. Plastid transformation in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Transgenic Res. 2010;19:113–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-009-9290-z.Muktadir MA, Habib MA, Khaleque Mian MA, Yousuf Akhond MA. Regeneration efficiency based on genotype, culture condition and growth regulators of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Agric Nat Resour. 2016;50:38–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANRES.2014.10.001.Rotino GL. Haploidy in eggplant. Dordrecht: Springer; 1996. p. 115–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1858-5_8.Emrani Dehkehan M, Moieni A, Movahedi Z. Effects of zeatin riboside, mannitol and heat stress on eggplantn (Solanum melongena L.) anther culture. Imam Khomeini Int Univ Biotechnol Soc. 2017;6:16–26. https://doi.org/10.30479/IJGPB.2017.1370.Magioli C, de Oliveira DE, Rocha APM, Mansur E. Efficient shoot organogenesis of eggplant ( Solanum melongena L.) induced by thidiazuron. Plant Cell Rep. 1998;17:661–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050461.Scoccianti V, Sgarbi E, Fraternale D, Biondi S. Organogenesis from Solanum melongena l. (eggplant) cotyledon explants is associated with hormone-modulated enhancement of polyamine biosynthesis and conjugation. Protoplasma. 2000;211:51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01279899.Rahman M, Asaduzzaman M, Nahar N, Bari M. Efficient plant regeneration from cotyledon and midrib derived callus in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). J Bio-Science. 2006;14:31–8. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbs.v14i0.439.Bhat SV, Jadhav A, Pawar BD, Kale AA, Chimote V, Pawar SV. In vitro shoot organogenesis and plantlet regeneration in brinjal (Solanum melongena L.). N Save Nat to Surviv. 2013;8:821–4.Swathy PS, Rupal G, Prabhu V, Mahato KK, Muthusamy A. In vitro culture responses, callus growth and organogenetic potential of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) to he-ne laser irradiation. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 2017;174:333–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.08.017.Acquadro A, Barchi L, Gramazio P, Portis E, Vilanova S, Comino C, et al. Coding SNPs analysis highlights genetic relationships and evolution pattern in eggplant complexes. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0180774. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180774.Ranil RHG, Prohens J, Aubriot X, Niran HML, Plazas M, Fonseka RM, Vilanova S, Fonseka HH, Gramazio P, Knapp S. Solanum insanum L. (subgenus Leptostemonum bitter, Solanaceae), the neglected wild progenitor of eggplant (S. melongena L.): a review of taxonomy, characteristics and uses aimed at its enhancement for improved eggplant breeding. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2017;64:1707–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-016-0467-z.Souza FVD. Garcia-Sogo B, Souza AS, San-Juán AP, Moreno V. Morphogenetic response of cotyledon and leaf explants of melon (Cucumis melo L.) cv. Amarillo Oro. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2006;49:21–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132006000100003.Abdalmajid M, Mohd RI, Mihdzar AK, Halimi MS. In vitro performances of hypocotyl and cotyledon explants of tomato cultivars under sodium chloride stress. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10:8757–64. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB10.2222.Matand K, Wu N, Wu H, Tucker E, Love K. More improved peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) protocol for direct shoot organogenesis in mature dry-cotyledonary and root tissues. J Biotech Res. 2013;5:24–34.Pierik RLM. In vitro culture of higher plants. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1997.Waman AA, Bohra P, Sathyanarayana BN, Umesha K, Mukunda GK, Ashok TH, Gowda B. Optimization of factors affecting in vitro establishment, ex vitro rooting and hardening for commercial scale multiplication of silk banana (Musa aab). Erwerbs-Obstbau. 2015;57:153–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-015-0244-8.Sarker R, Yesmin S, Hoque M. Multiple shoot formation in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Plant Tissue Cult Biotechnol. 2006;16:53–61. https://doi.org/10.3329/ptcb.v16i1.1106.Van Den Bulk RW, Lgffler HJM, Lindhout WH, Koornneef M. Somaclonal variation in tomato: effect of explant source and a comparison with chemical mutagenesis. Theor Appl Genet. 1990;80:817–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224199.Chen W, Tang CY, Kao YL. Ploidy doubling by in vitro culture of excised protocorms or protocorm-like bodies in Phalaenopsis species. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2009;98:229–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-009-9557-3.Syfert MM, Castaneda-Alvarez NP, Khoury CK, Sarkinen T, Sosa CC, Achicanoy HA, Bernau V, Prohens J, Daunay MC, Knapp S. Crop wild relatives of the brinjal eggplant (Solanum melongena): Poorly represented in genebanks and many species at risk of extinction. Am J Bot. 2016;103:635–51. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1500539.Muñoz-Falcón JE, Prohens J, Vilanova S, Nuez F. Diversity in commercial varieties and landraces of black eggplants and implications for broadening the breeders’ gene pool. Ann Appl Biol. 2009;154:453–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2009.00314.x.Kaushik P, Prohens J, Vilanova S, Gramazio P, Plazas M. Phenotyping of eggplant wild relatives and interspecific hybrids with conventional and phenomics descriptors provides insight for their potential utilization in breeding. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:677. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00677.Plazas M, Vilanova S, Gramazio P, Rodriguez-Burruezo A, Rajakapasha R, Ramya F, Niran L, Fonseka H, Kouassi B, Kouassi A, Kouassi A, Prohens J. Interspecific hybridization between eggplant and wild relatives from different genepools. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2016;141:34–44. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.141.1.34.Kouassi B, Prohens J, Gramazio P, Kouassi AB, Vilanova S, Galán-Ávila A, Herraiz FJ, Kouassi A, Seguí-Simarro JM, Plazas M. Development of backcross generations and new interspecific hybrid combinations for introgression breeding in eggplant (Solanum melongena). Sci Hortic (Amsterdam). 2016;213:199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCIENTA.2016.10.039.García-Fortea E, Gramazio P, Vilanova S, Fita A, Mangino G, Villanueva G, Arrones A, Knapp S, Prohens J, Plazas M. First successful backcrossing towards eggplant (Solanum melongena ) of a New World species, the silverleaf nightshade (S. elaeagnifolium ), and characterization of interspecific hybrids and backcrosses. Sci Hortic. 2019;246:563–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.018.Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio agsays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. 1962;15:473–9.Dpooležel J, Binarová P, Lcretti S. Analysis of nuclear DNA content in plant cells by flow cytometry. Biol Plant. 1989;31:113–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02907241.Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat. 1996;5:299–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713

Randomized clinical trial of the safety and immunogenicity of the Tdap vaccine in pregnant Mexican women

ABSTRACT Immunization with the tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (Tdap) vaccine raises controversies on immunogenicity and possible antibody interference. We performed an experimental, double-blind, parallel group controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the Tdap vaccine in 204 pregnant women and their children and to determine its interference in antibody production. Pregnant women 18 to 38 y of age with 12 to 24 weeks gestation, a low obstetric risk, and without serious disease were randomly selected. The experimental group received 0.5 mL IM of Tdap and the control group normal saline. Six blood samples were drawn before and after solution application, and from the umbilical cord of the infants and at 2, 4, and 6 months of age. Pertactin and Pertussis toxin antibodies and possible interference of maternal antibodies with the vaccine were determined. In the experimental group, antibodies against Bordetella pertussis pertactin (anti-PRN) (112 E/mL 95% CI 89.9–139.9) and antibodies against pertussis toxin (anti-PT) (24.0 E/mL, 95% CI 18.3–31.4) were elevated in the mother before vaccination. These were higher in the umbilical cord and descended in the infant at 2 months (71.4 (95% CI 56.8–89.7 and 10.9; 95% CI 8.7–13.7, respectively). Anti-PT showed a delay in production. Tdap safety was confirmed with only mild local pain at 24 and 48 hours. Anti-PRN and anti-PT antibodies in the infant descend at 2 months of age. There is a delay in anti-PT in children of immunized mothers. Further studies are needed to elucidate its clinical significance

Pregerminative treatments in Tillandsia ionantha seeds to obtain seedlings under in vitro culture

Objective: To search for an in vitro strategy to favor both germination and a greater number of seedlings in Tillandsia ionantha; also, to promote the development of future research on this species. Design/methodology/approach: Factor one: lighting conditions (light-dark), factor two: 13 preconditioning treatments, which included storage at room temperature and in refrigeration at 10° C, soaking (12 and 24 hours), with hydrogen peroxide (10 and 20 %), potassium nitrate (0.2 and 0.4 %), gibberellins (50 and 150 ml.l-1), three alternate incubation temperatures (28, 32 and 36 °C). They were sown in MS medium (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) at 25 %, adding 20 g.l-1 of sugar, 2 g.l-1 of activated carbon, and 5 .5 g.l-1 of agar. A flask with three seeds which coma removed was established as an experimental unit; 15 repetitions were established and placed in the incubation room at 24 °C with a photoperiod of 16:8. The germination process was recorded, and the seedlings were extracted two months after their establishment. Results: The treatment that resulted in the highest number of seeds that initiated the germination process and the highest number of plants was when the seeds were kept at room temperature. The highest contamination was observed in the treatment exposed to 32 °C. It was observed that 80% of the experimental units showed signs of imbibition within a few days, although the vast majority did not complete the process and the maximum yield was on average 1.4 seedlings. Conclusions: The best treatment is to use seeds stored at room temperature and if storage is necessary, to soak them for 12 h

Principales medidas de profilaxis en endoscopia bariátrica. Guía Española de Recomendación de Expertos

Bariatric endoscopy (BE) encompasses a number of techniques -some consolidated, some under development- aiming to contribute to the management of obese patients and their associated metabolic diseases as a complement to dietary and lifestyle changes. To date different intragastric balloon models, suture systems, aspiration methods, substance injections and both gastric and duodenal malabsorptive devices have been developed, as well as endoscopic procedures for the revision of bariatric surgery. Their ongoing evolution conditions a gradual increase in the quantity and quality of scientific evidence about their effectiveness and safety. Despite this, scientific evidence remains inadequate to establish strong grades of recommendation allowing a unified perspective on prophylaxis in BE. This dearth of data conditions leads, in daily practice, to frequently extrapolate the measures that are used in bariatric surgery (BS) and/or in general therapeutic endoscopy. In this respect, this special article is intended to reach a consensus on the most common prophylactic measures we should apply in BE. The methodological design of this document was developed while attempting to comply with the following 5 phases: Phase 1: delimitation and scope of objectives, according to the GRADE Clinical Guidelines. Phase 2: setup of the Clinical Guide-developing Group: national experts, members of the Grupo Español de Endoscopia Bariátrica (GETTEMO, SEED), SEPD, and SECO, selecting 2 authors for each section. Phase 3: clinical question form (PICO): patients, intervention, comparison, outcomes. Phase 4: literature assessment and synthesis. Search for evidence and elaboration of recommendations. Based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine classification, most evidence in this article will correspond to level 5 (expert opinions without explicit critical appraisal) and grade of recommendation C (favorable yet inconclusive recommendation) or D (inconclusive or inconsistent studies). Phase 5: External review by experts. We hope that these basic preventive measures will be of interest for daily practice, and may help prevent medical and/or legal conflicts for the benefit of patients, physicians, and BE in general