A review of elliptical and disc galaxy structure, and modern scaling laws

A century ago, in 1911 and 1913, Plummer and then Reynolds introduced their models to describe the radial distribution of stars in `nebulae'. This article reviews the progress since then, providing both an historical perspective and a contemporary review of the stellar structure of bulges, discs and elliptical galaxies. The quantification of galaxy nuclei, such as central mass deficits and excess nuclear light, plus the structure of dark matter halos and cD galaxy envelopes, are discussed. Issues pertaining to spiral galaxies including dust, bulge-to-disc ratios, bulgeless galaxies, bars and the identification of pseudobulges are also reviewed. An array of modern scaling relations involving sizes, luminosities, surface brightnesses and stellar concentrations are presented, many of which are shown to be curved. These 'redshift zero' relations not only quantify the behavior and nature of galaxies in the Universe today, but are the modern benchmark for evolutionary studies of galaxies, whether based on observations, N-body-simulations or semi-analytical modelling. For example, it is shown that some of the recently discovered compact elliptical galaxies at 1.5 < z < 2.5 may be the bulges of modern disc galaxies.Comment: Condensed version (due to Contract) of an invited review article to appear in "Planets, Stars and Stellar Systems"(www.springer.com/astronomy/book/978-90-481-8818-5). 500+ references incl. many somewhat forgotten, pioneer papers. Original submission to Springer: 07-June-201

Rare and Frequent Promoter Methylation, Respectively, of TSHZ2 and 3 Genes That Are Both Downregulated in Expression in Breast and Prostate Cancers

Neoplastic cells harbor both hypomethylated and hypermethylated regions of DNA. Whereas hypomethylation is found mainly in repeat sequences, regional hypermethylation has been linked to the transcriptional silencing of certain tumor suppressor genes. We attempted to search for candidate genes involved in breast/prostate carcinogenesis, using the criteria that they should be expressed in primary cultures of normal breast/prostate epithelial cells but are frequently downregulated in breast/prostate cancer cell lines and that their promoters are hypermethylated.We identified several dozens of candidates among 194 homeobox and related genes using Systematic Multiplex RT-PCR and among 23,000 known genes and 23,000 other expressed sequences in the human genome by DNA microarray hybridization. An additional examination, by real-time qRT-PCR of clinical specimens of breast cancer, further narrowed the list of the candidates. Among them, the most frequently downregulated genes in tumors were NP_775756 and ZNF537, from the homeobox gene search and the genome-wide search, respectively. To our surprise, we later discovered that these genes belong to the same gene family, the 3-member Teashirt family, bearing the new names of TSHZ2 and TSHZ3. We subsequently determined the methylation status of their gene promoters. The TSHZ3 gene promoter was found to be methylated in all the breast/prostate cancer cell lines and some of the breast cancer clinical specimens analyzed. The TSHZ2 gene promoter, on the other hand, was unmethylated except for the MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line. The TSHZ1 gene was always expressed, and its promoter was unmethylated in all cases.TSHZ2 and TSHZ3 genes turned out to be the most interesting candidates for novel tumor suppressor genes. Expression of both genes is downregulated. However, differential promoter methylation suggests the existence of distinctive mechanisms of transcriptional inactivation for these genes

Heparanase: Historical Aspects and Future Perspectives

Heparanase is an endo-β-glucuronidase that cleaves at a limited number of internal sites the glycosaminoglycan heparan sulfate (HS). Heparanase enzymatic activity was first reported in 1975 and by 1983 evidence was beginning to emerge that the enzyme was a facilitator of tumor metastasis by cleaving HS chains present in blood vessel basement membranes and, thereby, aiding the passage of tumor cells through blood vessel walls. Due to a range of technical difficulties, it took another 16 years before heparanase was cloned and characterized in 1999 and a further 14 years before the crystal structure of the enzyme was solved. Despite these substantial deficiencies, there was steady progress in our understanding of heparanase long before the enzyme was fully characterized. For example, it was found as early as 1984 that activated T cells upregulate heparanase expression, like metastatic tumor cells, and the enzyme aids the entry of T cells and other leukocytes into inflammatory sites. Furthermore, it was discovered in 1989 that heparanase releases pre-existing growth factors and cytokines associated with HS in the extracellular matrix (ECM), the liberated growth factors/cytokines enhancing angiogenesis and wound healing. There were also the first hints that heparanase may have functions other than enzymatic activity, in 1995 it being reported that under certain conditions the enzyme could act as a cell adhesion molecule. Also, in the same year PI-88 (Muparfostat), the first heparanase inhibitor to reach and successfully complete a Phase III clinical trial was patented. Nevertheless, the cloning of heparanase (also known as heparanase-1) in 1999 gave the field an enormous boost and some surprises. The biggest surprise was that there is only one heparanase encoding gene in the mammalian genome, despite earlier research, based on substrate specificity, suggesting that there are at least three different heparanases. This surprising conclusion has remained unchanged for the last 20 years. It also became evident that heparanase is a family 79 glycoside hydrolase that is initially produced as a pro-enzyme that needs to be processed by proteases to form an enzymatically active heterodimer. A related molecule, heparanase-2, was also discovered that is enzymatically inactive but, remarkably, recently has been shown to inhibit heparanase-1 activity as well as acting as a tumor suppressor that counteracts many of the pro-tumor properties of heparanase-1. The early claim that heparanase plays a key role in tumor metastasis, angiogenesis and inflammation has been confirmed by many studies over the last 20 years. In fact, heparanase expression is enhanced in all major cancer types, namely carcinomas, sarcomas, and hematological malignancies, and correlates with increased metastasis and poor prognosis. Also, there is mounting evidence that heparanase plays a central role in the induction of inflammation-associated cancers. The enzymatic activity of heparanase has also emerged in unexpected situations, such as in the spread of HS-binding viruses and in Type-1 diabetes where the destruction of intracellular HS in pancreatic insulin-producing beta cells precipitates diabetes. But the most extraordinary recent discoveries have been with the realization that heparanase can exert a range of biological activities that are independent of its enzymatic function, most notably activation of several signaling pathways and being a transcription factor that controls methylation of histone tails. Collectively, these data indicate that heparanase is a truly multifunctional protein that has the additional property of cleaving HS chains and releasing from ECM and cell surfaces hundreds of HS-binding proteins with a plethora of functional consequences. Clearly, there are many unique features of this intriguing molecule that still remain to be explored and are highlighted in this Chapter