40 research outputs found

    Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer

    Get PDF
    The aim of the study was to obtain United Kingdom-based societal preferences for distinct stages of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and six common toxicities. Health states were developed based on literature review, iterative cycles of interviews and a focus group with clinical experts. They described the burden of progressive, responding and stable disease on treatment; and also febrile neutropenia, stomatitis; diarrhoea/vomiting; fatigue; hand-foot syndrome (grade 3/4 toxicities) and hair loss. One hundred members of the general public rated them using standard gamble to determine health state utility. Data were analysed with a mixed model analysis. The study sample was a good match to the general public of England and Wales by demographics and current quality of life. Stable disease on treatment had a utility value of 0.72, with a corresponding gain of +0.07 following a treatment response and a decline by 0.27 for disease progression. Toxicities lead to declines in utility between 0.10 (diarrhoea/vomiting) and 0.15 (febrile neutropenia). This study underlines the value that society place on the avoidance of disease progression and severe side effects in MBC. This may be the largest preference study in breast cancer designed to survey a representative general public sample

    PCN53 A COMPARISION OF THE PSYCHOMETRICS PROPERTIES OF HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE INSTRUMENTS USED IN GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME PATIENTS

    Get PDF

    PCN26 ARE HEALTH STATES “TIMELESS”? A TEST OF THE UTILITY INDEPENDENCE ASSUMPTION USING A REPEATED MEASURES DESIGN

    Get PDF

    PMC24 PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF INSTRUMENTS USED TO MEASURE PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH PHARMACIST SERVICES

    Get PDF

    PMC82 PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF FOUR KISWAHILI TRANSLATED DISEASE SPECIFIC PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES

    Get PDF

    PMI26: ASSESSMENT OF RESPONDENT ACCEPTABILITY OF UTILITY MEASURES: DISCRIMINATORY POWER OF GRAPHIC POSITIONING SCALE VERSUS TRADITIONAL SCALING MEASURES

    Get PDF
    corecore