20 research outputs found

    Adjuvant treatment in biliary tract cancer

    Get PDF
    Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies with a dismal prognosis. Despite radical surgery, the five-year overall survival (OS) does not exceed 40% in the best series. Adjuvant treatments are widely used even though they have mainly been investigated in small retrospective series until recently. Available data suggest that chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (and relative prodrugs) or gemcitabine can reduce the risk of relapse and potentially improve patients\u2019 long-term outcome. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy seems to be confined to patients with positive surgical margins. In addition, patients with highrisk factors for relapse (nodal involvement and non-radical resection) benefit most from chemotherapy. Recent results from large randomized trials have clarified the benefit of adjuvant treatments and probably defined a new standard of care

    Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective single-center experience

    Get PDF
    Background & aims: Very few data are available in literature about the role of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and previous studies are mainly case reports and case series on a very small number of patients and nodules. In this study, we aimed to evaluate effectiveness and safety of RFA for the treatment of unresectable ICC. Methods: This is a retrospective observational cohort study comprising all consecutive patients treated with RFA for unresectable ICC at Policlinico Sant'Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy. Primary endpoint was Local Tumor Progression-Free Survival (LTPFS) while Overall Survival (OS) was also assessed as secondary endpoint. Results: From January 2014 to June 2019, 29 patients with 117 nodules underwent RFA. Technique effectiveness 1 month after RFA was 92.3%; median LTPFS was 9.27 months. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis showed that LTPFS was significantly related to tumor size ≥20 mm. At a median follow up of 39.9 months, median OS from the date of RFA was 27.5 months, with an OS of 89%, 45% and 11% at 1, 2 and 4 years, respectively. Number of overall lesions and the sum of their diameter at the moment of the first RFA significantly affected OS in multivariate analysis. Minor and major complication rates were 14% and 7%, respectively. Conclusion: Tumor size ≥20 mm was associated with lower LTPFS, representing a potential useful threshold value. A careful evaluation of tumor burden appears as a crucial element in choosing the best therapeutic strategy in unresectable ICC

    COVID-19 in an international European liver transplant recipient cohort.

    Get PDF
    Knowledge on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in liver transplant recipients is lacking, particularly in terms of severity of the disease. The aim of this study was to describe the demographic, baseline clinical characteristics and early outcomes of a European cohort of liver transplant recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We conducted an international prospective study across Europe on liver transplant recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by microbiological assay during the first outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic. Baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, management of immunosuppressive therapy and outcomes were collected. 57 patients were included (70% male, median (IQR) age at diagnosis 65 (57-70) years). 21 (37%), 32 (56%) and 21 (37%) patients had one cardiovascular disease, arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus, respectively. The most common symptoms were fever (79%), cough (55%), dyspnoea (46%), fatigue or myalgia (56%) and GI symptoms (33%). Immunosuppression was reduced in 22 recipients (37%) and discontinued in 4 (7%). With this regard, no impact on outcome was observed. Forty-one (72%) subjects were hospitalised and 11 (19%) developed acute respiratory distress syndrome. Overall, we estimated a case fatality rate of 12% (95% CI 5% to 24%), which increased to 17% (95% CI 7% to 32%) among hospitalised patients. Five out of the seven patients who died had a history of cancer. In this European multicentre prospective study of liver transplant recipients, COVID-19 was associated with an overall and in-hospital fatality rate of 12% (95% CI 5% to 24%) and 17% (95% CI 7% to 32%), respectively. A history of cancer was more frequent in patients with poorer outcome

    Integrated clinicopathologic and molecular analysis of endometrial carcinoma: Prognostic impact of the new ESGO-ESTRO-ESP endometrial cancer risk classification and proposal of histopathologic algorithm for its implementation in clinical practice

    Get PDF
    IntroductionThe European Society of Gynecologic Oncology/European Society of Radiation Therapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology (ESGO/ESTRO/ESP) committee recently proposed a new risk stratification system for endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients that incorporates clinicopathologic and molecular features. The aim of the study is to compare the new ESGO/ESTRO/ESP risk classification system with the previous 2016 recommendations, evaluating the impact of molecular classification and defining a new algorithm for selecting cases for molecular analysis to assign the appropriate risk class.MethodsThe cohort included 211 consecutive EC patients. Immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing were used to assign molecular subgroups of EC: POLE mutant (POLE), mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), p53 mutant (p53abn), and no specific molecular profile (NSMP).ResultsImmuno-molecular analysis was successful in all cases, identifying the four molecular subgroups: 7.6% POLE, 32.2% MMRd, 20.9% p53abn, and 39.3% NSMP. The recent 2020 guidelines showed a 32.7% risk group change compared with the previous 2016 classification system: the reassignment is due to POLE mutations, abnormal p53 expression, and a better definition of lymphovascular space invasion. The 2020 system assigns more patients to lower-risk groups (42.2%) than the 2016 recommendation (25.6%). Considering the 2020 risk classification system that includes the difference between “unknown molecular classification” and “known,” the integration of molecular subgroups allowed 6.6% of patients to be recategorized into a different risk class. In addition, the use of the proposed algorithm based on histopathologic parameters would have resulted in a 62.6% reduction in molecular analysis, compared to applying molecular classification to all patients.ConclusionApplication of the new 2020 risk classification integrating clinicopathologic and molecular parameters provided more accurate identification of low-and high-risk patients, potentially allowing a more specific selection of patients for post-operative adjuvant therapy. The proposed histopathologic algorithm significantly decreases the number of tests needed and could be a promising tool for cost reduction without compromising prognostic stratification

    Non-coding RNAs as predictive biomarkers to current treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer

    No full text
    The onset and selection of resistant clones during cancer treatment with chemotherapy or targeted therapy is a major issue in the clinical management of metastatic colorectal cancer patients. It is possible that a more personalized treatment selection, using reliable response-to-therapy predictive biomarkers, could lead to an improvement in the success rate of the proposed therapies. Although the process of biomarker selection and validation could be a long one, requiring solid statistics, large cohorts and multicentric validations, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) and in particular microRNAs, proved to be extremely promising in this field. Here we summarize some of the main studies correlating specific ncRNAs with sensitivity/resistance to chemotherapy, anti-VEGF therapy, anti-EGFR therapy and immunotherapy in colorectal cancer (CRC)

    Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin in aged patients with chronic hepatitis C

    No full text
    Background & Aims: Combination therapy with pegylated interferon (PEGIFN) and ribavirin has significantly improved virus eradication rate in patients affected by HCV-related chronic hepatitis (C-HC). However, only few data are available with respect to efficacy and safety of this therapy in aged patients. This study aimed at investigating efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy in aged patients with CH-C. Methods: 473 patients [319 (67.4%) naive, 195 (41,2% female) with CH-C (genotype 1, n=266; genotype 2, n=112, genotype 3, n=72, genotype 4, n=23), of whom 68 (14.4%) over 65 years old (mean age 69\ub12 years), were treated with Peg-IFN (alpha-2a or alpha-2b) plus ribavirin according to international guidelines from January 2007 to July 2011. These patients were assessed for sustained viral response (SVR) rate and for all known main predictors of SVR in CH-C. Results: The overall SVR rate resulted similar in both age groups [270/405 (66.6%) in subjects <65 years vs. 41/68 (60.3%) in subjects 6565 years, respectively, p=0.334)]. Overall, therapy discontinuance rate was low, with no significant difference between patients over or under age 65 (4.4% vs. 4.9%, respectively), the most common reason for discontinuance being anemia in both groups.For patients over 65, at multivariate analysis, non-na\uefve status, EVR and use of hematological growth factors were independent predictors of SVR. Factors independently related to EVR at multivariate analysis were non-naive, staging, genotype 2-3 vs. genotype1-4 and use of hematological growth factors Conclusions: Aged patients can be candidates for Peg-IFN plus ribavirin therapy. The appropriate use of hematological factors in these patients may be useful to achieve a significant reduction in the rate of therapy discontinuation due to hematological side-effects. The response-guided therapy may be applied in predicting therapy efficacy in this patient grou

    Sustained complete response of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with metronomic capecitabine: a report of three cases

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most frequent causes of cancer-related death. Sorafenib, a multitarget angiogenesis inhibitor, is an approved frontline treatment for advanced HCC in Western countries, although a complete response (CR) to treatment is infrequently reported. Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine, has been shown to be effect in both treatment-naïve patients and those previously treated with sorafenib. To date, however, only one case of sustained CR to metronomic capecitabine has been reported. Case presentation We describe three cases of advanced HCC treated with metronomic capecitabine where a CR was obtained. In the first case, capecitabine was administered as first line therapy; in the second case, capecitabine was used after intolerance to sorafenib; while in the third case, capecitabine was administered after sorafenib failure. Conclusion Capecitabine is a potentially important treatment option for patients with advanced HCC and may even represent a cure in certain cases

    Prevalence Of Subclinical Liver Fibrosis Among Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

    No full text
    Rationale Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a specific form of progressive fibrosing interstitial pneumonia of unknown cause. Common pathogenic mechanisms with chronic fibrotic disorders involving other organs are likely. Yet, data on the co-existence of subclinical fibrotic disease across multiple organs in patients with IPF are lacking. The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence of subclinical liver fibrosis among patients with IPF. Methods Patients referred to the Center for Rare Lung Disease of the University Hospital of Modena, with a diagnosis of IPF according to recent guidelines and without previous history of liver diseases underwent hepatic transient elastography (FibroScan®), a non-invasive technique measuring liver stiffness, which routinely used for the assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic liver diseases. Hepatic fibrotic status is expressed in a scale from 0 (absence of hepatic fibrosis) to 4 (severe liver fibrosis / cirrhosis). Patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥29 (confidence limit of the instrument) were excluded. Patients, in which any degree of hepatic fibrosis was detected, underwent screening for possible secondary causes of liver fibrosis. Results Among 48 IPF patients (34 males, mean age 69 years), 11 (23%) were excluded because of high BMI. In 8 out 37 patients (22%) it was not possible to obtain successful measurements due to the excess of subcutaneous adipose tissue in the chest wall, or narrow intercostal spaces. Thirteen of 37 patients (35%) had abnormal hepatic transient elastography results: 4 patients fell within the range F1-F2 (6.1-7.6 kPa), 6 in F2 (7.4-8.4 kPa), one in F2-F3 (9.5 kPa), 1 in F4 (14.3 kPa) and 1 was identified as probable fibrosis not otherwise classifiable. In all cases, secondary causes of hepatic fibrosis were excluded. Minor impairment of markers of liver injury was found in a minority of patients with liver fibrosis, with AST and ALT values exceeding the threshold value respectively in 2 and 3 patients with liver fibrosis, detected on elastography. Conclusions Over one third of patients in this IPF cohort had a concomitant fibrosing subclinical process in the liver. These preliminary data prompt the need for a large prospective study aimed at clarifying the correlation between the fibrosing processes in the lung and in the liver and the possibility of shared pathogenic mechanisms

    Specific Toxicity of Maintenance Olaparib Versus Placebo in Advanced Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    No full text
    Background/Aim: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the safety of maintenance with olaparib after platinum-based chemotherapy in cancer patients. Materials and Methods. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the clinical role of olaparib maintenance therapy versus placebo in BRCA-mutated, advanced cancers. Safety profile from each selected study was investigated for all-grade and G3-G4 haematological and nonhaematological adverse drug events (ADEs). Results: Four RTCs that involved 1099 patients were included in the analysis. Overall incidences of all-grade and G3-4 ADEs in olaparib group were 97.6% and 41%, respectively. Patients treated with maintenance olaparib showed higher risk of all-grade and G3-G4 anaemia, all-grade neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Moreover, all-grade and G3-G4 fatigue, all-grade vomiting, diarrhoea, nausea and decreased appetite were more common in the olaparib group compared to placebo. Conclusion: Despite an increased risk and incidence of several haematological and non-haematological toxicities, olaparib is a relatively safe agent for the treatment of advanced solid tumors. Prompt identification of ADEs is mandatory to avoid therapy discontinuation and optimize treatment
    corecore