22 research outputs found
Mean ± SEM of temperature-corrected arterial oxygen pressure.
<p>Ex1, Ex2, Ex3 and End Ex are minutes 1, 2, 3 and the end of exercise. Rec1, Rec2 and End Rec are minutes 1, 2 and the end of recovery. *p<0.05 vs. rest.</p
Simultaneous recording of chest transcutaneous and arterial oxygen pressure.
<p>Chest transcutaneous oxygen pressure (Transcutaneous pO<sub>2</sub>) and arterial pressure corrected for temperature changes (Art. temp.-corr. pO<sub>2</sub>). The dark square is the walking period.</p
Distribution of waveforms into the initial 16 clusters.
<p>Distribution of waveforms into the initial 16 clusters.</p
Preprocessing results.
<p>(a) The upper graph shows the original transcutaneous pO<sub>2</sub> signal. The lower graph shows the preprocessed transcutaneous pO<sub>2</sub> signal before clustering (second step) and the periods where the waveform is cut. (b) The upper graph shows the waveform of a cluster after the first step of the clustering. The lower graph shows the preprocessed waveform.</p
Dendrogram representation for hierarchical clustering of clusters.
<p>Dendrogram representation for hierarchical clustering of clusters.</p
Comparison between the empirical models and the statistical models resulting from the clustering analysis.
<p>Empirical models are dotted lines, and statistical models are solid lines. In the figure, the exercise period is in gray. In the table, the highest coefficients are in bold characters.</p
Characteristics of patients showing assumed normal (A or B) or abnormal (C or D) tcpO<sub>2</sub> profile types or that could not be classified.
*<p>is p<0.05 between type A or B and type C or D;</p>$<p>is p<0.05 between type A or B and non classifiable; NS is no significant difference.</p
Confusion matrix for classification by the statistical models versus the empirical models.
<p>Confusion matrix for classification by the statistical models versus the empirical models.</p
Nitric oxide (NO) production in aortas from intermittent air with standard diet (IA-SD), intermittent hypoxia with standard diet (IH-SD), intermittent air and high fat diet (IA-HFD) and intermittent hypoxia and high fat diet (IH-HFD) mice.
<p>Values are expressed in arbitrary units of amplitude per weight (mg) of dried tissue. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. And represent n = 5–7 mice *<i>p</i><0.05.</p
Effects of short-term intermittent hypoxia (IH) and high-fat diet (HFD) on body weight, food intake, liver mass, epididymal fat pad, lipid metabolism, and liver triglyceride content in mice.
<p>Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation;</p><p>*<i>p</i><0.05 vs IA-SD.</p><p><sup>#</sup><i>p</i><0.05 vs IA-HFD mice.</p><p><sup>§</sup> p<0.05 vs IH-SD. IA intermittent air, IH intermittent hypoxia, SD standard diet, HFD high fat diet</p><p>Effects of short-term intermittent hypoxia (IH) and high-fat diet (HFD) on body weight, food intake, liver mass, epididymal fat pad, lipid metabolism, and liver triglyceride content in mice.</p