Results from a population-based cohort study

Funding Information: We have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: ARF reports travel grants from Roche and advisory board fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Roche, outside the submitted work. DMB reports travel grants from LEO Farmacêuticos, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Ipsen, Janssen, Roche, and Novartis, advisory board fees from Janssen, Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Angelini, AstraZeneca, and Novartis, and institutional grants from F. Hoffmann-La Roche, outside the submitted work. The other authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Funding Information: The authors acknowledge the RON network that cooperated in providing up-to-date information on cases diagnosed and treated with the drug of interest (participating institutions: Centro Hospitalar Universit?rio de S?o Jo?o, Centro Hospitalar Universit?rio Lisboa Norte, Centro Hospitalar Universit?rio do Algarve, Hospital de Braga, Centro Hospitalar e Universit?rio de Coimbra, Centro Hospitalar de Tr?s-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Hospital Central do Funchal, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Centro Hospitalar Universit?rio Lisboa Central, Hospital Distrital de Santar?m, Centro Hospitalar de Entre o Douro e Vouga, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira Guimar?es, Centro Hospitalar de Set?bal, Centro Hospitalar e Universit?rio do Porto, Centro Hospitalar Tondela Viseu, Hospital do Esp?rito Santo de ?vora, Centro Hospitalar Barreiro Montijo, Hospital Beatriz ?ngelo, Hospital do Santo Esp?rito da Ilha Terceira, Hospital do Divino Esp?rito Santo de Ponta Delgada, Hospital Pedro Hispano ? ULS Matosinhos, Hospital do Litoral Alentejano ? Santiago do Cac?m ? ULS Litoral Alentejano, Centro Hospitalar do Oeste, Centro Hospitalar M?dio Tejo, Hospital Jos? Joaquim Fernandes ? Beja ? ULS Baixo Alentejo, Centro Hospitalar Universit?rio da Cova da Beira, Centro Cl?nico Champalimaud, Hospitais CUF, Hospitais da Luz, Hospitais dos Lus?adas, Hospital Particular do Algarve). Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The AuthorsBackground: Real-world (RW) data may provide valuable information on the effectiveness and safety of medicines, which is particularly relevant for clinicians, patients and third-party payers. Evidence on the effectiveness of palbociclib plus fulvestrant is scarce, which highlights the need of additional studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of palbociclib plus fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer (ABC). Materials and methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study and cases of interest were identified through the Portuguese National Cancer Registry database and additional data sources. Patients aged≥18 years, diagnosed with ABC and exposed to palbociclib plus fulvestrant between May 31, 2017 and March 31, 2019 were included. Patients were followed-up until death or cut-off date (February 28, 2021). Primary outcome was rw-progression-free survival (rwPFS). Secondary outcomes were rw-overall survival (rwOS), rw-time to palbociclib failure (rwTPF) and rw-time to next treatment (rwTTNT). Results: A total of 210 patients were included. Median age was 58 years (range 29–83) and 99.05% were female. Median follow-up time was 23.22 months and, at cut-off date, treatment had been discontinued in 189 patients, mainly due to disease progression (n = 152). Median rwPFS was 7.43 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.28–9.05) and 2-year rwPFS was 16.65% (95%CI 11.97–22.00). Median rwOS was 24.70 months (95%CI 21.58–29.27), median rwTPF was 7.5 months (95%CI 6.51–9.08) and median rwTTNT was 11.74 months (95%CI 10.33–14.08). Conclusion: Palbociclib plus fulvestrant seems an effective treatment for ABC in real-world context. Compared to registrations studies, rwPFS and rwOS were shorter in real-life setting.publishersversionpublishe

Magnitude and temporal variations of socioeconomic inequalities in the quality of life after early breast cancer: results from the multicentric French CANTO Cohort

PURPOSE: Socioeconomic status (SES) influences the survival outcomes of patients with early breast cancer (EBC). However, limited research investigates social inequalities in their quality of life (QoL). This study examines the socioeconomic inequalities in QoL after an EBC diagnosis and their time trends. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used data from the French prospective multicentric CANTO cohort (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01993498), including women with EBC enrolled between 2012 and 2018. QoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Core 30 questionnaire (QLQ-C30). summary score at diagnosis and 1 and 2 years postdiagnosis. We considered three indicators of SES separately: self-reported financial difficulties, household income, and educational level. We first analyzed the trajectories of the QLQ-C30 summary score by SES group. Then, social inequalities in QLQ-C30 summary score and their time trends were quantified using the regression-based slope index of inequality (SII), representing the absolute change in the outcome along socioeconomic gradient extremes. The analyses were adjusted for age at diagnosis, Charlson Comorbidity Index, disease stage, and type of local and systemic treatment. RESULTS: Among the 5,915 included patients with data on QoL at diagnosis and at the 2-year follow-up, social inequalities in QLQ-C30 summary score at baseline were statistically significant for all SES indicators (SIIfinancial difficulties = -7.6 [-8.9; -6.2], SIIincome = -4.0 [-5.2; -2.8]), SIIeducation = -1.9 [-3.1; -0.7]). These inequalities significantly increased (interaction P <.05) in year 1 and year 2 postdiagnosis, irrespective of prediagnosis health, tumor characteristics, and treatment. Similar results were observed in subgroups defined by menopausal status and type of adjuvant systemic treatment. CONCLUSION: The magnitude of preexisting inequalities in QoL increased over time after EBC diagnosis, emphasizing the importance of considering social determinants of health during comprehensive cancer care planning.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Implementation of a remote symptom monitoring pathway in oncology care: analysis of real-world experience across 33 cancer centres in France and Belgium

Background: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) of symptoms using electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROs) has been shown to reduce symptom burden and hospitalizations, increase dose intensity and improve quality of life of patients during systemic therapy being recommended by international guidelines in routine oncology practice. However, implementation in routine care has been slow and faces several challenges. In this study we report on the real-world multi-center implementation of a RPM pathway encompassing weekly patient symptom ePRO reporting with electronic alert notifications triggered to providers for severe or worsening symptoms. Methods: An RPM pathway was implemented in 33 European cancer centers in France and Belgium between November 2021 and August 2023. The implementation process followed a standardized phasic process of Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment. Patient-level and system-level implementation metrics were collected and evaluated according to the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Findings: Across the 33 cancer centers, the RPM pathway was implemented for 3015 patients cared for by 168 providers. The RPM pathway enabled effective and timely symptom management with 94.6% of all alerts (10,132/10,711) evolving to an improvement two weeks later, among which 88.4% (9468/10,711) showed ≥2 grades of improvement on the 5-point scale of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology (PRO-CTCAE). The median time to alert management by the care team was 13 h 41 min (25th percentile: 1 h 42 min, 75th percentile: 1 day + 19 h 54 min), with 80% (36,269/45,334) of alerts managed by a nurse navigator telephone call. Patient adherence with weekly ePRO reporting was 82% (2472/3015). In an experience survey, 87% (32/38) of providers were satisfied with integrating the solution into their organization and 90% (276/307) of the patients felt that ePRO reporting positively impacted their care. As of March 2024, the pathway has been maintained in all participating centers, with activation of an additional 18 centers following data lock, and reimbursement for this RPM pathway approved in France in October 2023. Interpretation: These findings demonstrate the feasibility of implementing and maintaining an RPM pathway during routine care across a diverse group of cancer centers in the European setting, with high levels of patient and provider engagement, and positive clinical impact. Funding: Part of this work was funded Breast Cancer Research Foundation (Career Development Award to Maria Alice Franzoi) and Resilience (nurse navigation and technology support).info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stage IIB/III Triple Negative Breast Cancer with Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin (CAP Regimen): A Single Arm, Single Center Phase II Study (GBECAM 2008/02)

BackgroundThe DNA damaging platinum salts have been explored in the treatment of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) based on preclinical, and, more recently, clinical evidence of specific susceptibility of TNBC to these agents. Despite the increased toxicity, treatment intensification with polychemotherapy improves response and might be of interest in patients presenting with large primaries. In this trial, we aimed at exploring the efficacy and tolerability of the addition of cisplatin to standard anthracycline–cyclophosphamide backbone in patients with stage IIB/III TNBC.Patients and methodsThis is a single arm, single center, non-randomized, phase II trial of stage IIB/III TNBC. Patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin (50 mg/m2) in combination with doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) every 21 days and for a total of six cycles (CAP). After surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel (75 mg/m2) every 21 days was further provided for four cycles. Primary outcome was pathological complete response in the breast and axilla (pCR; ypT0ypN0). Secondary outcomes were safety, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsEight (19.5%) out of 41 patients reached a pCR and 35 (85.4%) had a clinical complete or partial response. After a median follow-up of 47.4 months (interquartile range 30.9–61.9), the proportion of patients free of recurrence or death at 3 years was of 51.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 34.6–66.5%], while the proportion of patients alive at 3 years was of 55.5% (95% CI 37.8–70.1%). Patients with a pCR rate or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer showed a numerical but statistically non-significant trend for improved DFS and OS. The majority of patients received six cycles of CAP (82.9%). The three most common grade ≥3 adverse events were nausea (16.3%), vomiting (14.0%), and neutropenia (9.3%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in three patients (7.0%).ConclusionCisplatin in association with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide was associated with a pCR rate of 19.5% in a cohort of patients with predominantly stage III tumors. The tolerability profile of this combination poses clinical challenges to its general use in clinical practice.Unique Identifier NumberGBECAM 2008/02.NCT Identifier NumberNCT03304756

Association between pertuzumab-associated diarrhoea and rash and survival outcomes in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: Exploratory analysis from the CLEOPATRA trial

Background: Skin rash and diarrhoea are known side-effects of pertuzumab. Studies with other anti-HER2 agents suggested that adverse events correlate with patient outcomes. In this exploratory cohort of patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer included in the CLEOPATRA trial we evaluated the value of rash and diarrhoea as prognostic markers and as predictors of pertuzumab benefit. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the multicenter, prospective, randomised CLEOPATRA trial. We defined two analytic cohorts: cohort 1 (C1) included patients from treatment initiation, and cohort 2 (C2) included patients after discontinuation of docetaxel. A landmark analysis was introduced to deal with immortal-time bias. Study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used. Results: Of the 808 patients and after application of the landmark analysis, C1 and C2 included 777 and 518 patients, respectively. In C1, rash occurred in 271 patients (34.9%) and diarrhoea in 470 (60.5%). Rash was prognostic for PFS and OS (C1: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.66 [95% CI = 0.48-0.91], p = 0.010]; C2: aHR 0.52 [95% CI = 0.30-0.89], p = 0.018) in both cohorts, while diarrhoea was only prognostic for PFS in cohort 2 (aHR = 0.65 [95% CI = 0.46-0.91], p = 0.011). Rash and diarrhoea were not predictive of pertuzumab benefit (in terms of PFS/OS) in the two cohorts. Conclusions: In patients treated with pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel, rash is prognostic whenever it occurs during treatment, while diarrhoea only has prognostic value when occurring after docetaxel discontinuation. However, neither rash nor diarrhoea predict pertuzumab benefit. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

PET/CT in Patients with Breast Cancer Treated with Immunotherapy

Significant advances in breast cancer (BC) treatment have been made in the last decade, including the use of immunotherapy and, in particular, immune checkpoint inhibitors that have been shown to improve the survival of patients with triple negative BC. This narrative review summarizes the studies supporting the use of immunotherapy in BC. Furthermore, the usefulness of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (2-[18F]FDG) positron emission/computerized tomography (PET/CT) to image the tumor heterogeneity and to assess treatment response is explored, including the different criteria to interpret 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT imaging. The concept of immuno-PET is also described, by explaining the advantages of mapping treatment targets with a non-invasive and whole-body tool. Several radiopharmaceuticals in the preclinical phase are referred too, and, considering their promising results, translation to human studies is needed to support their use in clinical practice. Overall, this is an evolving field in BC treatment, despite PET imaging developments, the future trends also include expanding immunotherapy to early-stage BC and using other biomarkers