A Longitudinal Study of Power Relations in a British Olympic Sport Organization

The purpose was to examine the power relations during a change of culture in an Olympic sports organisation in the United Kingdom. We conducted a 16-month longitudinal study combining Action Research and Grounded Theory. Data collection included ethnography and focus group discussion (n=10), with athletes, coaches, parents, and the national governing body. We supplemented these with twenty-six interviews with stakeholders, and we analysed data using grounded theory. The core concept found was power relations further divided into systemic power and informational power. Systemic power (e.g. formal authority to reward or punish) denotes how the NGB sought to implement change from the top-down and impose new strategies on the organisation. The informational power (e.g. tacit feeling of oneness and belonging) represented how individuals and subunits mobilised coalitions to support or obstruct the sports organisation's agenda. Olympic sports organisations should consider the influence of s power when undertaking a change of culture

A Qualitative Meta-Study of a Decade of the Holistic Ecological Approach to Talent Development

The Holistic-Ecological Approach (HEA) was introduced in 2010, and it is now important to provide a critical review after a decade of research elaborating on the framework. The purpose of this study was to critically assess the methodological and theoretical trends in research using the HEA in the study of athletic talent development environments (ATDE). We used a qualitative meta-study to review twelve studies published from 2010 to the first quarter of 2021. Our meta-theory analysis found that future studies should consider the use of Bronfenbrenner's work on development and address previous critiques on its use since it can limit the potential of the HEA research. In the meta-methods, we found that all studies used multiple and varied data collection strategies (e.g., interviews, observations, organisational documents). We also found a high degree of transparency and rigour exemplified by using multiple validity strategies. Method weaknesses were an underrepresentation of neutral or negative cases. The meta-data analysis showed that most ATDEs were classified as successful or unsuccessful ahead of data collection, suggesting potential confirmation bias. We also found that all ATDEs had competing findings, which suggests a need for exploring negative or ambiguous findings. Future research could benefit from clarifying the use of underlying theoretical assumptions; contrasting findings with neutral cases, outliers, and negative cases to clarify the definition of successful ATDEs; and expanding on the methodological approach

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) genotype and phenotype among Danish cancer patients: prevalence and correlation between <i>DPYD</i>-genotype variants and P-uracil concentrations

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) genotype and phenotype among Danish cancer patients: prevalence and correlation between DPYD-genotype variants and P-uracil concentration

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) genotype and phenotype among Danish cancer patients: prevalence and correlation between DPYD-genotype variants and P-uracil concentrations

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) genotype and phenotype among Danish cancer patients: prevalence and correlation between DPYD-genotype variants and P-uracil concentration

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) genotype and phenotype among Danish cancer patients: prevalence and correlation between <i>DPYD</i>-genotype variants and P-uracil concentrations

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) genotype and phenotype among Danish cancer patients: prevalence and correlation between DPYD-genotype variants and P-uracil concentration