Evaluation of Intensivist-Nurses’ Knowledge Concerning Medication Administration Through Nasogastric and Enteral Tubes

This study evaluates the knowledge of nurses working in intensive care units concerning recommendations for the proper administration of medication through nasogastric and enteral tubes. This exploratory-descriptive study with a quantitative approach was carried out with 49 nurses in an intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital in Fortaleza, CE, Brazil. A total of 36.7% of nurses reported they disregard the dosage forms provided by the pharmacy at the time of administering the medication through tubes. Metal, wood, or a plastic mortar is the method most frequently reported (42.86%) for crushing prescribed solid forms; 32.65% leave the drugs in 20ml of water until dissolved; 65.3% place the responsibility for choosing the pharmaceutical formulation and its correlation with the tube site, either into the stomach or into the intestine, on the physician. The results indicate there is a gap between specific literature on medication administered through tubes and knowledge of nurses on the subject.El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar los conocimientos del enfermero de la unidad de cuidados intensivos sobre las recomendaciones para la correcta administración de medicamentos por sonda nasogástrica y nasoentérica. Se trata de un estudio exploratorio-descriptivo y cuantitativo con 49 enfermeros en una unidad de cuidados intensivos de un hospital terciario, en la ciudad de Fortaleza, estado de Ceará, Brasil. 36,7% no prestan atención a las formas disponibles en el sector de farmacia en el momento de su utilización por sonda. El pilón de metal, madera o plástico fue el método más citado (42,86%) para triturar las formas sólidas prescritas. 32,65% dejan los fármacos en 20mL de agua hasta que se disuelvan. 65,3% atribuyen al médico la responsabilidad de decidir sobre la formulación y la correlación con la ubicación de la sonda en el tracto gastrointestinal. Los resultados indican que hay una diferencia entre la literatura para los medicamentos administrados por sonda y el conocimiento de los enfermeros sobre el tema.O estudo objetivou avaliar o conhecimento do enfermeiro de unidade de terapia intensiva sobre as recomendações para a correta administração de medicamentos, por sondas nasogástrica e nasoenteral. Estudo exploratório-descritivo, com abordagem quantitativa, realizado com 49 enfermeiros em uma unidade de terapia intensiva de um hospital terciário, localizado na cidade de Fortaleza, no Estado do Ceará, Brasil. Dos enfermeiros, 36,7% relataram não dar atenção às formas farmacêuticas disponibilizadas pelo setor de farmácia na hora da utilização por sonda. O pilão de metal, madeira ou plástico foi o método mais referido (42,86%) para triturar as formas sólidas prescritas. Sendo que 32,65% costuma deixar os fármacos em 20mL de água até dissolver, 65,3% atribuem ao médico a responsabilidade sobre a decisão da formulação farmacêutica e a correlação com a localização da sonda no trato gastrointestinal. Os achados apontam para diferença entre a literatura específica para medicamentos administrados por sonda e o conhecimento de enfermeiros sobre o assunto

Dentoalveolar comparative study between removable and fixed cribs, associated to chincup, in anterior open bite treatment

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to compare the dentoalveolar effects produced by two types of palatal crib, removable (Rpc+C) and fixed (Fpc+C), combined with chincup in growing patients with anterior open bite. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Each group comprised 30 patients, in the mixed dentition phase, with similar cephalometric characteristics and skeletal ages. Group 1 (Rpc+C) presented initial mean age of 8.3 years and mean anterior open bite of 4.0 mm. Group 2 (Fpc+C) presented initial mean age of 8.54 years and mean anterior open bite of 4.3 mm. The evaluation period comprised 12 months between initial (T1) and second lateral radiograph (T2). The T2-T1 changes were compared cephalometrically in the 2 groups using the non-paired t-test. RESULTS: Vertical changes in the posterior dentoalveolar region were similar between the groups (about 1 mm) and no significant differences were found in molar mesialization. The Fpc+C group had in average 1.6 mm more improvement of the overbite as a result of greater maxillary incisor extrusion (1.3 mm). Patients in this group also presented less lingual tipping of maxillary incisors and more mandibular incisors uprighting. CONCLUSIONS: The Fpc+C combination was more efficient in the correction of the negative overbite mainly due to greater extrusion of the maxillary incisors. However, the Rpc+C appliance promoted better upper and lower incisor inclination, resulting in a more adequate overjet

Comparative histomorphometric analysis between α-Tcp cement and β-Tcp/Ha granules in the bone repair of rat calvaria

This study compared the effect of two bioceramics on the process of bone repair: α-tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP) cement and β-tricalcium phosphate hydroxyapatite particles (β-TCP/HA). Calvarial defects were created in 50 rats, divided into two groups (α and β/HA). Software was used at 7, 21, 60, 90 and 120 days to assess bone formation. Mean new bone formation rates were as follows: α group, 1.6% at 7 days, 5.24% at 21 days, 24% at 60 days, 30.21% at 90 days and 50.59% at 120 days; β/HA group, 1.94% at 7 days, 2.53% at 21 days, 12.47% at 60 days, 26.84% at 90 days and 38.82% at 120 days; control group, 0.15% at 7 days, 10.12% at 21 days, 15.10% at 60 days, 18.94% at 90 days, 48.50% at 120 days. Both materials are osteoconductive and biocompatible. Perhaps the larger rate of new bone formation observed in the α-TCP group, it also occurs in the β-TCP/HA group within a longer time period