Refining dosing by oral gavage in the dog: A protocol to harmonise welfare

Introduction: The dog is a frequently-used, non-rodent species in the safety assessment of new chemical entities. We have a scientific and ethical obligation to ensure that the best quality of data is achieved from their use. Oral gavage is a technique frequently used to deliver a compound directly into the stomach. As with other animals, in the dog, gavage is aversive and the frequency of its use is a cause for welfare concern but little research has been published on the technique nor how to Refine it. A Welfare Assessment Framework (Hall, 2014) was previously developed for use with the laboratory-housed dog and a contrasting pattern of behaviour, cardiovascular and affective measures were found in dogs with positive and negative welfare. Methods: Using the framework, this study compared the effects of sham dosing (used to attempt to habituate dogs to dosing) and a Refined training protocol against a control, no-training group to determine the benefit to welfare and scientific output of each technique. Results: Our findings show that sham dosing is ineffective as a habituation technique and ‘primes' rather than desensitises dogs to dosing. Dogs in the control group showed few changes in parameters across the duration of the study, with some undesirable changes during dosing, while dogs in the Refined treatment group showed improvements in many parameters. Discussion: It is recommended that if there is no time allocated for pre-study training a no-sham dosing protocol is used. However, brief training periods show a considerable benefit for welfare and quality of data to be obtained from the dogs' use

A Novel Statistical Algorithm for Gene Expression Analysis Helps Differentiate Pregnane X Receptor-Dependent and Independent Mechanisms of Toxicity

Genome-wide gene expression profiling has become standard for assessing potential liabilities as well as for elucidating mechanisms of toxicity of drug candidates under development. Analysis of microarray data is often challenging due to the lack of a statistical model that is amenable to biological variation in a small number of samples. Here we present a novel non-parametric algorithm that requires minimal assumptions about the data distribution. Our method for determining differential expression consists of two steps: 1) We apply a nominal threshold on fold change and platform p-value to designate whether a gene is differentially expressed in each treated and control sample relative to the averaged control pool, and 2) We compared the number of samples satisfying criteria in step 1 between the treated and control groups to estimate the statistical significance based on a null distribution established by sample permutations. The method captures group effect without being too sensitive to anomalies as it allows tolerance for potential non-responders in the treatment group and outliers in the control group. Performance and results of this method were compared with the Significant Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) method. These two methods were applied to investigate hepatic transcriptional responses of wild-type (PXR+/+) and pregnane X receptor-knockout (PXR−/−) mice after 96 h exposure to CMP013, an inhibitor of β-secretase (β-site of amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1 or BACE1). Our results showed that CMP013 led to transcriptional changes in hallmark PXR-regulated genes and induced a cascade of gene expression changes that explained the hepatomegaly observed only in PXR+/+ animals. Comparison of concordant expression changes between PXR+/+ and PXR−/− mice also suggested a PXR-independent association between CMP013 and perturbations to cellular stress, lipid metabolism, and biliary transport

Serum perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) concentrations in normal and hyperlipidemic female hamsters dosed orally with ammonium perfluorooctanoate (APFO) for up to 30 days

In epidemiology studies, the presence of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in human blood has been associated with higher serum cholesterol concentrations. A possible explanation for these results is that elevated serum cholesterol might reduce clearance of PFOA. In this study, female hamsters, which transport and regulate cholesterol in a manner similar to humans, were fed normal diet or diet supplemented with 0.05% cholesterol and 10% coconut oil (high-fat diet) resulting in hyperlipidemia throughout the study in supplemented animals. Hamsters on either a normal and high-fat diet were given oral doses of 0.1, 1.0, or 10 mg APFO/kg for 30 days. Serum PFOA concentrations evaluated 24 h after 1, 10, 20, and 30 doses of APFO were not altered in hyperlipidemic hamsters compared to those fed normal diet. For a given dose group, serum concentrations of PFOA were highest following the 10 doses (except for the 10 mg/kg group where concentrations were the highest after the first dose) and were lowest after 20 and 30 doses. Under the condition of this study, higher serum lipids did not affect the absorption and clearance of serum PFOA. Serum PFOA concentrations declined over the course of the study despite continued daily dosing with APFO. This does not support the hypothesis that higher serum lipids might increase the retention of PFOA in the body