215 research outputs found
Types of parent-child relationship and indicators of neuropsychological development of preschool children
Introduction: During the last 20 years, in Russia and in many EU countries, there has been significant change in the global social and cultural situation. Individualistic tendencies rose sharply and there is a widespread destruction of the sense of belonging. In this regard, the type of parent-child relationship is changing, which is one of the key dimension of the neuropsychological development of children. There is a logical question for psychologists, teachers and parents, what types of parent-child relationships are constructive, that is, they favor normal neuropsychological development of children of preschool age (6-7 years).
Purpose: The purpose of the present work is to investigate correlation between types of parent-child relationships and indicators of neuropsychological development of children, as well as identifying constructive types of parent-child relationships for the normal neuropsychological development of children.
Methodology: The study was conducted within the framework of the basic screening program (pre-school stage). The Order of the Ministry of health of the Russian Federation of 03.07.2000 ? 241 On approval of the Medical card of the child for educational institutions (together with the Instruction on the procedure of an accounting form ? 026/u-2000 (The Medical card of the child for educational institutions of preschool, primary, basic, secondary (complete) general education, primary and secondary vocational education, orphanages and boarding schools). Determination of the correspondence of neuropsychological development to the child's age was carried out according to the following indicators: thinking and speech; attention and memory; positive emotions and social contacts; sensorimotor development. Types of parental relationship was studied using the methodology of the Questionnaire βParental relationshipβ (QPR), A.Y. Varga, V.V. Stolin. The sample was formed from 94 respondents who were screened in the framework of the basic screening program (preschool stage) at the health Center of the MC βGuberniaβ in Novosibirsk. The study of determination of the type of parent-child relationship of 47 respondents (mothers) was conducted and the neuropsychic development of 47 children of preschool age in the families (6-7 years) was evaluated.
Results and Discussion: The data obtained indicate that different types of parent-child relationship such as βCooperationβ and βSymbiosisβ positively interrelated with different indicators (attention and memory; the development of positive emotions and the presence of significant experiences in children) of the child's neuropsychological development. Such types of parent-child relationship as βInfantilismβ and βAcceptance-rejectionβ negatively interrelated with such indicators of child's neuropsychological development as attention and memory; thinking, speech and positive emotions and social contacts.
Conclusion: Children in groups with a more βconstructiveβ parental relationship type have higher cognitive scores and fewer behavioral problems. The materials of the study can be used by child psychologists in the evaluation of neuropsychological development of the child. The Bank of diagnostic techniques that quickly allow diagnosing the state of neuropsychic development of the child in relation to the type of parental relations and thereby increasing the effectiveness of its correction through work with parents is of practical importanc
Recommended from our members
The proton electrochemical gradient induces a kinetic asymmetry in the symport cycle of LacY.
LacY catalyzes accumulation of galactosides against a concentration gradient by coupling galactoside and H+ transport (i.e., symport). While alternating access of sugar- and H+-binding sites to either side of the membrane is driven by binding and dissociation of sugar, the electrochemical H+ gradient ([Formula: see text]) functions kinetically by decreasing the Km for influx 50- to 100-fold with no change in Kd The affinity of protonated LacY for sugar has an apparent pK (pKapp) of βΌ10.5, due specifically to the pKa of Glu325, a residue that plays an irreplaceable role in coupling. In this study, rates of lactose/H+ efflux were measured from pH 5.0 to 9.0 in the absence or presence of a membrane potential (ΞΞ¨, interior positive), and the effect of the imposed ΞΞ¨ on the kinetics of efflux was also studied in right-side-out membrane vesicles. The findings reveal that [Formula: see text] induces an asymmetry in the transport cycle based on the following observations: 1) the efflux rate of WT LacY exhibits a pKapp of βΌ7.2 that is unaffected by the imposed ΞΞ¨; 2) ΞΞ¨ increases the rate of efflux at all tested pH values, but enhancement is almost 2 orders of magnitude less than observed for influx; 3) mutant Glu325 - Ala does little or no efflux in the absence or presence of ΞΞ¨, and ambient pH has no effect; and 4) the effect of ΞΞ¨ (interior positive) on the Km for efflux is almost insignificant relative to the 50- to 100-fold decrease in the Km for influx driven by ΞΞ¨ (interior negative)
Π Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ -Π»-ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ Π² ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠ° Π² ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΡΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π²ΡΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Π°
The article analyzes the hypothesis about the participial functioning of the l form in the history of the Russian language in the light of Russian dialectal data and the material of other Slavic languages. Many facts that confirm this hypothesis are found in both Russian dialects and Slavic languages. The first part of the paper discusses the functioning of participles in the dialect of the Opotchesky district of the Pskov region and provides the comparative analysis of the functions of the participle in the examined dialect and the l-form in the Old Russian chronicles. As the material shows, the analyzed forms have much in common, which testifies to the participial role that the l-form used to take. The second part of the paper answers some remarks made in a recent paper by M. Sheveleva by providing other facts from the history of the Russian language, Russian and other Slavic dialects, which are relevant to the correct understanding of the evolution of the l-form.Β DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2022.11.1.10The article analyzes the hypothesis about the participial functioning of the l form in the history of the Russian language in the light of Russian dialectal data and the material of other Slavic languages. Many facts that confirm this hypothesis are found in both Russian dialects and Slavic languages. The first part of the paper discusses the functioning of participles in the dialect of the Opotchesky district of the Pskov region and provides the comparative analysis of the functions of the participle in the examined dialect and the l-form in the Old Russian chronicles. As the material shows, the analyzed forms have much in common, which testifies to the participial role that the l-form used to take. The second part of the paper answers some remarks made in a recent paper by M. Sheveleva by providing other facts from the history of the Russian language, Russian and other Slavic dialects, which are relevant to the correct understanding of the evolution of the l-form.Β DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2022.11.1.10Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Π° ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ -Π»-ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ Π² ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠ° Π² ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π²ΡΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Π°. ΠΠ°ΠΊ Π² ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ°Ρ
, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π² Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ»Π°Π²ΡΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ
ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΠ², ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΄Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅ΠΌΡΡ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Ρ. Π ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠΉ Π² Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠ΅ ΠΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΉΠΎΠ½Π° ΠΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠΉ Π² ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΌ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ΅ ΠΈ -Π»-ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ Π² Π΄ΡΠ΅Π²Π½Π΅- ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π»Π΅ΡΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΡΡ
. ΠΠ°ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π», Ρ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
ΡΠΎΡΠΌ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ -Π»-ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ. ΠΠΎ Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ Π² ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ
ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π² Π½Π΅Π΄Π°Π²Π½Π΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ Π. Π. Π¨Π΅Π²Π΅Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΡΡ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠ΅, ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ -Π»-ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΡ ΠΈΠ· ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠ°, ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π²ΡΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ².Β DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2022.11.1.1
ΠΠ‘ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ‘Π’Π ΠΠΠΠ¦ΠΠΠΠΠΠ¬ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠ’ΠΠΠΠΠΠ’Π Π£ ΠΠΠ¦ Π‘ Π ΠΠΠΠ«ΠΠ Π’ΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠ‘ΠΠ₯ΠΠΠΠΠΠ§ΠΠ‘ΠΠΠ₯ ΠΠ ΠΠΠΠ¦
This article is devoted to the current socio-psychological problem seen as peculiarities of personal emotional intelligence with different types of psychological boundaries in the youth. In general terms, the author refers to the psychological boundaries as Β«EgoΒ» functions, which are aimed at delimiting Β«my ownΒ» from Β«otherΒ», emphasizing the identical and protecting it from the non-identical. Psychological boundaries are considered to be the decisive factor for development, transformation and functioning of emotional intelligence, as a personal phenomenon. Emotional intelligence is considered by the author as a set of abilities to understand, call and recognize emotions. Being a system of affective and cognitive representations, emotional intelligence functions on the borderline of internal and external space. Empirical research is based on key psychological principles: the principle of consistency and the principle of the unity of external influences and internal conditions. We used the following methods and procedures in our study: Β«Boundaries in the mindΒ» by E. Hartmann, in adaptation of O.A. Shamshikova, V. I. Volokhovoy, 2013; Β«Self boundaryΒ» N. Brown, in adaptation of E. O. Shamshikova, 2010; Emotional Intelligence (Β«EQΒ») Test by N. Hall in adaptation of E.I. Ilyin, 2001; Emotional Intelligence (Β«EmInΒ») Test by D. Lusin, 2006. The selection of the study included 58 respondents aged from 23 to 35 y.o. The study consisted of two phases. The first is aimed at establishing the existence of interrelation between personal psychological boundaries and emotional intelligence (for data processing we used SpearmanΒ»s rs rang correlation coefficient), the second is aimed at identifying the significant differences of personal emotional intelligence with different types of psychological boundaries (U-Manna Whitney). The study has demonstrated that the better psychological boundaries are formed, the higher is a degree personalityΒ»s ability to understand own emotions and emotions of others, as well as to manage these emotions. The highest rates of emotional intelligence are found in individuals with medium level of psychological distntsy.ΠΠ°Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅, ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° Ρ Π»ΠΈΡ Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΈΠΏΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ Π² Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. Π ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Β«Π―Β», Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Β«ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΒ» ΠΎΡ Β«ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΒ», Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈ Π·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ°Ρ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΎΡ Π½Π΅ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ. ΠΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΡ Π²ΡΡΡΡΠΏΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ, ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π°. ΠΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊΡΠΏΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΡ, Π½Π°Π·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Π²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ. Π―Π²Π»ΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΡΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ Π½Π° Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²Π°. ΠΠΌΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±Π°Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π° Π΄ΡΡΡ
ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠ°Ρ
ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ: ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠ΅ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²Π° Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΉ. Π ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠΈ: Β«ΠΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΡ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΒ» Π. Π₯Π°ΡΡΠΌΠ°Π½Π½Π° Π² Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π. Π. Π¨Π°ΠΌΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ, Π. Π. ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ, 2013 Π³.; Β«ΠΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΡ Π―Β» Π. ΠΡΠ°ΡΠ½ Π² Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π. Π. Π¨Π°ΠΌΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ, 2010 Π³.; ΠΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊ Π. Π₯ΠΎΠ»Π»Π° β ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° Π² Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π.Π. ΠΠ»ΡΠΈΠ½Π°, 2001 Π³.; Π’Π΅ΡΡ ΡΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° Π.Π. ΠΡΡΠΈΠ½Π° (ΠΠΠΠ), 2006 Π³. Π Π½Π΅ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ 58 ΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π² Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈ: ΠΎΡ 23 Π΄ΠΎ 35 Π»Π΅Ρ. ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎ ΠΈΠ· Π΄Π²ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠΎΠ². ΠΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΠΉ β Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π΅ΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠΌ (ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ°Π½Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ rs-Π‘ΠΏΠΈΡΠΌΠ΅Π½Π°), Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ β Π½Π° Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° Ρ Π»ΠΈΡ Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΈΠΏΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ (ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΉ U-ΠΠ°Π½Π½Π° Π£ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈ). Π ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π»ΡΡΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΡ, ΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π²ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Π²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΈ ΡΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡ
Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅ΠΉ. ΠΠ°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΡΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ Ρ Π»ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ
Recommended from our members
Insights into VDAC Gating: Room-Temperature X-ray Crystal Structure of mVDAC-1
The voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) is a crucial mitochondrial protein that facilitates ion and metabolite exchange between mitochondria and the cytosol. Initially characterized over three decades ago, the structure of VDAC-1 was resolved in 2008, revealing a novel Ξ²-barrel protein architecture. This study presents the first room-temperature crystal structure of mouse VDAC-1 (mVDAC-1), which is a significant step toward understanding the channel's gating mechanism. The new structure, obtained at a 3.3 Γ
resolution, demonstrates notable differences from the previously determined cryogenic structure, particularly in the loop regions, which may be critical for the transition between the 'open' and 'closed' states of VDAC-1. Comparative analysis of the root-mean-square deviation (R.M.S.D.) and B-factors between the cryogenic and room-temperature structures suggests that these conformational differences, although subtle, are important for VDAC's functional transitions. The application of electric field-stimulated X-ray crystallography (EF-X) is proposed as a future direction to resolve the 'closed' state of VDAC-1 by inducing voltage-driven conformational changes in order to elucidate the dynamic gating mechanism of VDAC-1. Our findings have profound implications for understanding the molecular basis of VDAC's role in mitochondrial function and its regulation under physiological conditions
QAIDS Model Based on Russian Pseudo - Panel Data: Impact of 1998 and 2008 Crises
The aim of this work is to compare shifts in the consumer behaviour of Russian households since the mid - nineties till nowadays. The research considers the consumer behaviour of the Russians over almost the maximum possible available data RLMS period, focusing on the crisis years. Special attention is paid to analysis of the effects of crises in 1998 and 2008. To reveal effects as shifts in consumer behaviour in the aftermath of two crises panel data analysis is used to estimate QAIDS model. Due to the complete sample attrition observed in RLMS dataset since 1994, pseudo-panel approach is used
- β¦