Additional file 1 of Dietary pesticide exposure and non-communicable diseases and mortality: a systematic review of prospective studies among adults

Additional file 1: Supplemental Method 1. Request for research. Supplemental Table 1. PRISMA Checklist. Supplemental Table 2. Excluded studies and reasons for exclusion

Baseline characteristics of participants included into the analyses¹.

<p>SU.VI.MAX Study, France, 1994–1996.</p><p>PNNS-GS: Programme National Nutrition Santé Guideline Score. Categories of the PNNS-GS: Low: <6 points; medium: ≥6 and <9 points; high: ≥9 points.</p><p>BMI: body mass index. WC: waist circumference.</p>1<p>Values are medians (quartile 1; quartile 3) or frequencies.</p>2<p>Kruskal-Wallis-test for continuous variables and Chi²-test for categorical variables.</p>3<p>On at least five days of the week.</p>4<p>Data on WC was only available for 878 men and 391 women.</p>5<p>Word Health Organization cut-off for a substantially increased risk of metabolic Complications (for Caucasians): >102 cm (men); >88 cm (women) <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0087083#pone.0087083-Alberti1" target="_blank">[53]</a>.</p

PNNS-GS1 and PNNS-GS2: Comparison of components and scoring.

a</p

Six-year anthropometric changes according to categories of the Programme National Nutrition Santé Guideline Score (PNNS-GS), n = 1479.

<p>SU.VI.MAX study, France, 1994–2002.</p><p>Categories of the PNNS-GS: Low: <6 points; medium: ≥6 and <9 points; high: ≥9 points.</p>1<p>Least-squares mean.</p>2<p>95%- confidence interval (corrected according to Dunnett).</p>3<p>T-test with Dunnett correction.</p>4<p>Overall F-test (analysis of variance and covariance model).</p>5<p>Unadjusted.</p>6<p>Adjusted for age, energy intake.</p>7<p>Model B + adjustment for supplementation group, number of dietary records, initial height, education level, smoking, menopausal status (women).</p>8<p>Presented for illustrative purposes, but to be interpreted with caution (high number of adjustment variables/small number of women with a low PNNS-GS).</p>9<p>WC: waist circumference. Measures of WC at baseline and follow-up were only available for 878 male and 391 female participants.</p

Characteristics of participants included in the analyses (n = 1479), as compared to excluded participants (n = 1511)¹.

<p>SU.VI.MAX Study, France, 1994–1996.</p><p>BMI: body mass index.</p><p>Q: quartile.</p>1<p>Parent population: participants of the SU.VI.MAX study with a baseline age of 45–60 years and a baseline body.</p><p>mass index of ≥25 kg/m² (n = 2990).</p>2<p>Number of participants for which data were available.</p>3<p>Median (Q1, Q3) for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables.</p>4<p>Kruskal-Wallis-test for continuous variables and Chi²-test for categorical variables.</p

Food group consumption by quintile of PNNS-GS2, NutriNet-Santé study, <i>N</i> = 54,089^a.

Food group consumption by quintile of PNNS-GS2, NutriNet-Santé study, N = 54,089a.</p

Selection of participants of the SU.VI.MAX study, France, 1994–2002, for the present analyses.

<p>Selection of participants of the SU.VI.MAX study, France, 1994–2002, for the present analyses.</p

Construction of the Programme National Nutrition Santé – Guideline Score (PNNS-GS).

1<p>Recommendations of the Programme National Nutrition Santé.</p>2<p>Servings per day unless otherwise indicated.</p>3<p>EI: energy intake without alcohol.</p>4<p>Established according to French recommended dietary allowances.</p

Flowchart of participants included in the present analysis of the NutriNet-Santé cohort.

PNNS-GS2, Programme National Nutrition Santé Guidelines Score 2.</p

“Direct comparison” of the predictive value of dietary scores for the risk of overweight and obesity—NutriNet-Santé study.

a</p