4 research outputs found
Scan protocol for the CT scans of the three scanners.
<p>S1: Philips Brilliance ICT 256, S2: GE Discovery CT 750 HD, S3: Siemens Somatom Definition AS Open, O-MAR: Metal Artifact Reduction for Orthopedic Implants, SMAR: Smart Metal Artifact Reduction, MARIS: Metal Artifact Reduction in Image Space.</p><p>* S2 scanned using dual energy. S3 used both a metal artifact reduction technique based on single and on dual energy using a tube voltage of 140/80 kV.</p><p>Scan protocol for the CT scans of the three scanners.</p
The increase in average absolute error (AAE) of all standard CT reconstructions of the phantom containing three amalgam implants as a function of the position of the slice.
<p>A high error was observed in a 9 mm wide region around the amalgam implants at 0 mm. In addition, a high error was observed at -48 mm and +24 mm which were caused by movement of the tongue and the upperjaw due to the insertion of amalgam implants respectively. S1: Philips Brilliance ICT 256, S2: GE Discovery CT 750 HD, S3: Siemens Somatom Definition AS Open.</p
The average absolute error (AAE) with and without different metal artifact reduction (MAR) techniques.
<p>(a) The AAE between reference scans, for scans without MAR, for scans with the commercial MAR technique and for scans corrected using the MDT software. For S3, MAR2 is displayed. (b) The AAE reduction after the application of both the commercial MAR techniques and the metal deletion technique (MDT). S1: Philips Brilliance ICT 256, S2: GE Discovery CT 750 HD, S3: Siemens Somatom Definition AS Open.</p
The Kyoto Kagaku PH-47 head/neck phantom.
<p>(a) The assembled phantom. (b) The disassembled jaw.</p