Individually Body Weight-Adapted Contrast Media Application in Computed Tomography Imaging of the Liver at 90 kVp

Objectives The aim of the present study was to evaluate the attenuation and image quality (IQ) of a body weight-adapted contrast media (CM) protocol compared with a fixed injection protocol in computed tomography (CT) of the liver at 90 kV. Materials and Methods One hundred ninety-nine consecutive patients referred for abdominal CT imaging in portal venous phase were included. Group 1 (n = 100) received a fixed CM dose with a total iodine load (TIL) of 33 g I at a flow rate of 3.5 mL/s, resulting in an iodine delivery rate (IDR) of 1.05 g I/s. Group 2 (n = 99) received a body weight-adapted CM protocol with a dosing factor of 0.4 g I/kg with a subsequent TIL adapted to the patients' weight. Injection time of 30 seconds was kept identical for all patients. Therefore, flow rate and IDR changed with different body weight. Patients were divided into 3 weight categories; 70 kg or less, 71 to 85 kg, and 86 kg or greater. Attenuation (HU) in 3 segments of the liver, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were used to evaluate objective IQ. Subjective IQ was assessed by a 5-point Likert scale. Differences between groups were statistically analyzed (P 0.05). Body weight-adapted protocoling led to more homogeneous enhancement of the liver parenchyma compared with a fixed protocol with a mean enhancement per weight category in group 2 of 126.5 +/- 15.8, 128.2 +/- 15.3, and 122.7 +/- 21.2 HU compared with that in group 1 of 139.9 +/- 21.4, 124.6 +/- 24.8, and 116.2 +/- 17.8 HU, respectively. Conclusions Body weight-adapted CM injection protocols result in more homogeneous enhancement of the liver parenchyma at 90 kV in comparison to a fixed CM volume with comparable objective and subjective IQ, whereas overall CM volume can be safely reduced in more than half of patients

Aortic root evaluation prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation-Correlation of manual and semi-automatic measurements

BACKGROUND:Pre-procedural TAVI planning requires highly sophisticated and time-consuming manual measurements performed by experienced readers. Semi-automatic software may assist with partial automation of assessment of multiple parameters. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences between manual and semi-automatic measurements in terms of agreement and time. METHODS:One hundred and twenty TAVI candidates referred for the retrospectively ECG-gated CTA (2nd and 3rd generation dual source CT) were evaluated. Fully manual and semi-automatic measurements of fourteen aortic root parameters were assessed in the 20% phase of the R-R interval. Reading time was compared using paired samples t-test. Inter-software agreement was calculated using the Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) in a 2-way mixed effects model. Differences between manual and semi-automatic measurements were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS:The time needed for evaluation using semi-automatic assessment (3 min 24 s ± 1 min 7 s) was significantly lower (p<0.001) compared to a fully manual approach (6 min 31 sec ± 1 min 1 sec). Excellent inter-software agreement was found (ICC = 0.93 ± 0.0; range:0.90-0.95). The same prosthesis size from manual and semi-automatic measurements was selected in 92% of cases, when sizing was based on annular area. Prosthesis sizing based on annular short diameter and perimeter agreed in 99% and 96% cases, respectively. CONCLUSION:Use of semi-automatic software in pre-TAVI evaluation results in comparable results in respect of measurements and selected valve prosthesis size, while necessary reading time is significantly lower

Contrast agent concentration optimization in CTA using low tube voltage and dual-energy CT in multiple vendors: a phantom study

We investigated the feasibility and extent to which iodine concentration can be reduced in computed tomography angiography imaging of the aorta and coronary arteries using low tube voltage and virtual monochromatic imaging of 3 major dual-energy CT (DECT) vendors. A circulation phantom was imaged with dual source CT (DSCT), gemstone spectral imaging (GSI) and dual-layer spectral detector CT (SDCT). For each scanner, a reference scan was acquired at 120 kVp using routine iodine concentration (300 mg I/ml). Subsequently, scans were acquired at lowest possible tube potential (70, 80, 80 kVp, respectively), and DECT-mode (80/150Sn, 80/140 and 120 kVp, respectively) in arterial phase after administration of iodine (300, 240, 180, 120, 60, 30 mg I/ml). Objective image quality was evaluated using attenuation, CNR and dose corrected CNR (DCCNR) measured in the aorta and left main coronary artery. Average DCCNR at reference was 227.0, 39.7 and 60.2 for DSCT, GSI and SDCT. Maximum iodine concentration reduction without loss of DCCNR was feasible down to 180 mg I/ml (40% reduced) for DSCT (DCCNR 467.1) and GSI (DCCNR 46.1) using conventional CT low kVp, and 120 mg I/ml (60% reduced) for SDCT (DCCNR 171.5) using DECT mode. Low kVp scanning and DECT allows for 40–60% iodine reduction without loss in image quality compared to reference. Optimal scan protocol and to which extent varies per vendor. Further patient studies are needed to extend and translate our findings to clinical practice

The role of standard non-ECG gated chest CT in cardiac assessment:design and rationale of the Cardiac Pathologies in standard chest CT (CaPaCT) study

Modern high-performance computed tomography (CT) scanners with improved scan acquisition times now allow for routine assessment of cardiac pathologies on chest CTs, which can result in numerous incidental cardiac findings. The CaPaCT study, an observer blinded, single-centre study, aims to assess the visibility, management and possible clinical impact of incidental cardiac pathologies that are now becoming visible on standard chest CTs. A total of 217 consecutive patients referred for a chest CT on a high-performance third-generation dual-source CT scanner will be included. Tube voltage settings will be chosen via automated kV selection. Dedicated cardiac reconstructions will be added to the standard post-processing: 0.6-mm slice thickness, 0.4-mm increment and Bv36 kernel (iterative reconstruction/strength 3). Primary endpoints will be the presence and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) assessed via a 17-segment model. These data will be collected and analysed by two experienced, blinded cardiac radiologists. Furthermore, information on aortic and mitral valve morphology/calcification and pericardial abnormalities will be collected. The CAD Reporting and Data System classification will subsequently be used to assess the management and possible clinical burden of any incidentally detected CAD. Additionally, objective and subjective image quality (attenuation, contrast-to-noise, signal-to-noise and 5-point Likert scale) of the obtained cardiac reconstructions will be assessed