8 research outputs found

    Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors 7cm and above. Perioperative outcomes

    No full text
    ABSTRACT Purpose: To assess and report the outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy) LPN) for T2 renal masses. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of patients undergoing LPN for clinically localized renal masses ≥7cm between the years 2005-2016. Descriptive analyses were generated for demographics, lesion characteristics, perioperative variables (operative time, warm ischemia time (WIT), estimated blood loss (EBL), intra-operative and postoperative complications (IOC and POC) and pathologic variables (pathology, subtype and Fuhrman grade). Results: A total of 27 patients underwent LPN for a T2 renal mass at our institution between 2005 and early 2016 of which 19 were males. The mean age was 66 (52-72). All procedures were transperitoneal with 16 on the right and 11 on the left. Median operative time was 200 minutes (IQR 181-236) and median WIT 19 minutes (IQR 16-23). EBL was 125mL (IQR 75-175). One case was converted to laparoscopic radical nephrectomy due to suspected tumor thrombus in the renal vein. Surgical margins were positive in one renal tumor in a patient with multiple tumors. There was a total of 2 IOC (7.4%) and 3 POC (11%) classified as Clavien grade 3. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this series is the first to describe the outcomes of LPN for cT2 renal masses. In our series, LPN for larger renal masses appears feasible with favorable perioperative outcomes. Additional data are needed to further explore the benefits of minimally invasive surgical approaches to larger renal masses

    Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors 7cm and above. Perioperative outcomes

    No full text
    <div><p>ABSTRACT Purpose: To assess and report the outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy) LPN) for T2 renal masses. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of patients undergoing LPN for clinically localized renal masses ≥7cm between the years 2005-2016. Descriptive analyses were generated for demographics, lesion characteristics, perioperative variables (operative time, warm ischemia time (WIT), estimated blood loss (EBL), intra-operative and postoperative complications (IOC and POC) and pathologic variables (pathology, subtype and Fuhrman grade). Results: A total of 27 patients underwent LPN for a T2 renal mass at our institution between 2005 and early 2016 of which 19 were males. The mean age was 66 (52-72). All procedures were transperitoneal with 16 on the right and 11 on the left. Median operative time was 200 minutes (IQR 181-236) and median WIT 19 minutes (IQR 16-23). EBL was 125mL (IQR 75-175). One case was converted to laparoscopic radical nephrectomy due to suspected tumor thrombus in the renal vein. Surgical margins were positive in one renal tumor in a patient with multiple tumors. There was a total of 2 IOC (7.4%) and 3 POC (11%) classified as Clavien grade 3. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this series is the first to describe the outcomes of LPN for cT2 renal masses. In our series, LPN for larger renal masses appears feasible with favorable perioperative outcomes. Additional data are needed to further explore the benefits of minimally invasive surgical approaches to larger renal masses.</p></div

    Body mass index and the clinicopathological characteristics of clinically localized renal masses-An international retrospective review

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential association between body mass index (BMI) and clinicopathological features of clinically localized renal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An international, multi-institutional retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery for clinically localized renal masses between 2000 and 2010 was undertaken after an institutional review board approval. Patients were divided into 4 absolute BMI groups based on the entire cohort׳s percentiles and 4 relative BMI groups based on their respective population (American or Italian). Renal mass pathological diagnosis, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtype, Fuhrman grade (low and high), and clinical stage were compared among groups using Fisher׳s exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and the Cochran-Armitage trend test. A multivariate logistic analysis was performed to evaluate independent association between tumor and patient characteristics with tumor pathology (Fuhrman grade). RESULTS: A total of 1,748 patients having a median BMI of 28 (interquartile range 25-32) were evaluated. Benign masses and RCC cases had similar proportion across BMI groups (P = 0.4). The most common RCC subtype was clear cell followed by papillary carcinoma, chromophobe, and other subtypes. Their distribution was comparable across BMI groups (P = 0.7). Similarly, clinical stage distribution was comparable with the overall cohort. The distribution of Fuhrman grade in RCC, however, demonstrated an increased proportions of low grade with increasing BMI (P<0.05). This trend was maintained in subgroups according to gender, stage and age (P<0.05 in all subgroup analysis). In a multivariable model that included potential confounders (i.e., age, sex, and tumor size) higher BMI groups had lower odds of presenting a high Fuhrman grade. CONCLUSION: In this study, higher BMI was associated with lower grade of RCC in clinically localized renal masses. This may, in part, explain better survival rates in patients with higher BMI and may correlate with a possible link between adipose tissue and RCC biology
    corecore